Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

Focused Care at Cedar BayouCMS #6762041 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0626 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #1) reviewed for admission/transfer/discharge rights. CR #1 was not allowed to return to the facility after being sent to doctor's office and hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge, a disruption of care, and being discharged without alternate placement. The findings included: Review of CR #1's closed record's face sheet dated 04/25/23 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, repeated falls, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism (A condition resulting from decreased production of thyroid hormones) and hypertension. Resident #1 was her own responsible party. Record review of CR #1's MDS dated [DATE] reflected her BIMs Score was 15 indicating she was mentally competent. Record review of CR #1 Hospital discharge paper dated 12/27/22 reflected CR#1 was discharged from hospital to another facility on 12/27/22. Record review of Intake ID # 415595 dated 03/31/23 reflected CR #1 was involuntary discharged from facility. Record review of facility's provided letter, titled NMNC signed by facility staff on 10/02/22 and unsigned by resident \responsible party reflected that skilled service would end on 10/03/22. Record review of nurse's note dated 12/16/2022 3:30PM, read in part: Resident went to the MD appointment on 6am-2pm shift, on this 2pm-10pm shift, PCT called and said that resident was transported to the emergency from the doctor appointment . In an interview with facility staff on 04/25/23 at 3:00PM, she said CR # 1 was issued a discharge notice on 10/20/22 and an appeal was requested on 11/10/22. She said Resident was not accepted back to the facility since resident was already issued a discharge letter while she was in and out of hospital. She said Resident #1 was in the window period of being discharged . She said the hospital (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676204 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676204 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 04/25/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Focused Care at Cedar Bayou 2000 W Baker Road Baytown, TX 77521 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0626 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Staff told her that Resident #1 was discharged to a safe place where her needs could be met. She said CR #1 would not be re-admitted to the facility due to nonpayment. She said Resident#1's Medicaid application was denied due to lack of medical necessity. Record review of Fair Hearing - Medicaid dated 12/20/2022 titled - Nursing Facility Discharge Case Number: 184427248; Appeal ID: 3614410 read in part- The Hearings Officer instructs the nursing facility to: o Allow the Appellant to remain in the facility and do not discharge Appellant from the facility. o Within 10 days from the date of this decision, the nursing facility must report compliance with this order. o This order does not preclude the nursing facility from processing any future notices of discharge, and the Appellant or Appellant's representative retains the right to appeal any future discharge actions by the nursing facility. During an interview with Hospital Social Worker B on 04/25/22 at 4:00PM, he said the initial facility was contacted prior to resident's discharge and he was told by the facility staff that the facility would not accept the resident back. He said he made other arrangements and was able to send CR # 1 to another local rehab facility for treatment. During an interview with Facility Administrator and DON on 04/25/22 beginning at 4:30PM the Administrator said it was the policy of the facility to accept resident's back to the facility. She said all discharges\readmit always come through another department that handle all admissions. She said the facility normally receive a letter from the admission team to expect the resident she said she was not at the facility during the time of Resident #1. The DON said the facility did not receive any notice from the admission team on behalf of CR #1. Record review of facility's policy on admission, transfer and discharge rights dated 2001 updated 2005 read in part-Each resident will be permitted to remain in the facility and not transferred or discharged . #2 if the resident exercises his or her right to appeal a transfer or discharge notice he\she will not be transferred or discharged while appeal is pending . FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676204 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0626GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F626 - Transfer and discharge-

    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 25, 2023 survey of Focused Care at Cedar Bayou?

This was a inspection survey of Focused Care at Cedar Bayou on April 25, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Focused Care at Cedar Bayou on April 25, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.