Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

REMINGTON TRANSITIONAL CARE OF SAN ANTONIOCMS #6762161 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure RN A documented a repeat blood pressure level when the initial level was below the approved range to administer Metoprolol Succinate (a blood pressure medication). This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 12/13/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was listed as his own responsible party with his [family member] listed a secondary contact. Resident #1 discharged on 12/09/2025. Record review of Resident #1's EMR Medical Diagnosis tab, undated and accessed 12/13/2025 at 10:58 a.m., revealed diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic (the branch of medicine dealing with conditions affecting the bones or muscles) aftercare following surgical amputation (the action of cutting off a limb, such as a leg below the knee), heart failure (a chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and hypertension ( a chronic condition where the pressure in the body's blood vessels is consistently too high). Record review of Resident #1's discharge with return anticipated MDS, dated [DATE] and signed 12/11/2025 as completed, did not reflect Resident #1's mental status score. Resident #1's functional abilities were documented as requiring partial/moderate assistance for transfers. Record review of Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status, dated effective 11/27/2025, reflected Resident #1 had a memory problem and was moderately impaired regarding making decisions for daily life. Record review of Resident #1's Order Recap Report, dated 12/13/2025 for orders dated 11/26/2025- 12/09/2025, reflected the physician order Metoprolol Succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN HOLD IF SBP < 100, DBP < 60, or HR < 60. The order was noted as dated 11/26/2025 with start date 12/27/2025 and end date 12/12/2025. Record review of Resident #1's Skilled Administration Record, dated 12/01/2025- 12/31/2025, reflected the order Metoprolol Succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN HOLD IF SBP < 100, DBP < 60, or HR < 60. The administration record indicated the medication was administered on 12/02/2025 by RN A. The hours of administration were documented as *6a 1. The blood pressure and pulse values for 12/02/2025 were documented as NA. NA was not defined on the record. Record review of Resident #1's EMR Blood Presssure tab, undated and accessed 12/13/2025 at 11:33 a.m., revealed two (2) blood pressure values for 12/02/2025, 127/57 mmHg by RN A at 07:04 a.m. and 150/69 mmHg by 09:26 p.m. by LPN B. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 11/13/2025- 12/14/2025 did not reveal a progress note regarding the provision of Metoprolol Succinate (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676216 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676216 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Remington Transitional Care of San Antonio 5423 Hamilton Wolfe Rd San Antonio, TX 78229 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete on 12/02/2025 or a reassessment of Resident #1's blood pressure. Resident #1 was unavailable on 12/14/2025 and 12/15/2025 for observation or interview due to his status as an in-patient at a local military hospital that does not allow visitation. During an interview on 12/14/2025 at 10:42 a.m., Resident #1's family member and listed contact stated she had concerns regarding Resident #1's blood pressure treatment at a prior facility, but she did not reveal concerns regarding his blood pressure treatment at the facility he discharged from on 12/09/2025. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 03:13 p.m., MD C stated he was providing care to Resident #1 while the resident was admitted to the facility. MD C denied having had received notification of Resident #1's blood pressure having been below administration range for the Metoprolol Succinate order. MD C stated he did not have concerns if RN A had administered Resident #1 the Metoprolol Succinate on 12/02/2025 if the DBP was at 57 mmHg and below the hold order. MD C stated the only impact would have been that Resident #1 could have experienced some dizziness. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 03:35 p.m., RN A stated she couldn't recall administering Resident #1 his Metoprolol Succinate on 12/02/2025 but stated she probably re-checked Resident #1's blood pressure prior to administering since the initial DBP was outside the administration range. She stated she would re-check a resident's blood pressure if the values seemed outside the resident's normal range or were outside the administration range. She stated, if she had re-checked Resident #1's blood pressure, she probably didn't document the new values. She stated the impact of not documenting the new values was that the administration would show as a medication error. She stated she was aware the hold values for the medication administration were written into the order and if she administered the medication when the resident's blood pressure was already low, the medication could cause the resident's blood pressure to drop even lower. She stated she would have continued to monitor Resident #1 throughout her shift on 12/02/2025. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 04:47 p.m., the DON stated *6a 1 for administration time referred to medications scheduled to be administered between 06:00 a.m. to 01:00 p.m. The DON stated if the medication order stated to hold if the DBP was below 60 mmHg and the measured DBP was 57 mmHg, he would have expected the staff member to have contacted the physician. He stated, while reviewing Resident #1's EMR, that he believed the administration documentation was in error because the EMR would have triggered a warning to the administering nurse if the blood pressure was outside the administration range. The DON stated the administering nurse could have prevented the error if she had entered the repeat blood pressure she had obtained into the administration record. The DON revealed the lack of documentation for the repeat blood pressure value would not have impacted Resident #1's care but might result in the resident's physician questioning why Resident #1's DBP was low. The DON stated he would have expected the administering nurse to have documented the new vitals by entering the repeat vitals into the administration record or the vitals tab. Record review of facility policy, Documentation in Medical Record, date implemented 10/24/2022, reflected Policy:Each resident's medical record shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy.2. Documentation shall be completed at the time of service, but no later than the shift in which the assessment, observation, or care service occurred.3. Principles of documentation include, but are not limited to: . b. Documentation shall be accurate, relevant, and complete, containing sufficient details about the resident's care and/or responses to care. Event ID: Facility ID: 676216 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 15, 2025 survey of REMINGTON TRANSITIONAL CARE OF SAN ANTONIO?

This was a inspection survey of REMINGTON TRANSITIONAL CARE OF SAN ANTONIO on December 15, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at REMINGTON TRANSITIONAL CARE OF SAN ANTONIO on December 15, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.