F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility
failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily
accessible, and systematically organized for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical
records. The facility failed to ensure RN A documented a repeat blood pressure level when the initial level
was below the approved range to administer Metoprolol Succinate (a blood pressure medication). This
failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or
incomplete clinical records. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated
12/13/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was listed as his own
responsible party with his [family member] listed a secondary contact. Resident #1 discharged on
12/09/2025. Record review of Resident #1's EMR Medical Diagnosis tab, undated and accessed
12/13/2025 at 10:58 a.m., revealed diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic (the branch of medicine
dealing with conditions affecting the bones or muscles) aftercare following surgical amputation (the action
of cutting off a limb, such as a leg below the knee), heart failure (a chronic, progressive condition in which
the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and hypertension ( a chronic
condition where the pressure in the body's blood vessels is consistently too high). Record review of
Resident #1's discharge with return anticipated MDS, dated [DATE] and signed 12/11/2025 as completed,
did not reflect Resident #1's mental status score. Resident #1's functional abilities were documented as
requiring partial/moderate assistance for transfers. Record review of Resident #1's Brief Interview for
Mental Status, dated effective 11/27/2025, reflected Resident #1 had a memory problem and was
moderately impaired regarding making decisions for daily life. Record review of Resident #1's Order Recap
Report, dated 12/13/2025 for orders dated 11/26/2025- 12/09/2025, reflected the physician order
Metoprolol Succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1
tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN HOLD IF SBP < 100, DBP < 60, or HR < 60. The order was noted
as dated 11/26/2025 with start date 12/27/2025 and end date 12/12/2025. Record review of Resident #1's
Skilled Administration Record, dated 12/01/2025- 12/31/2025, reflected the order Metoprolol Succinate ER
Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 50 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a
day for HTN HOLD IF SBP < 100, DBP < 60, or HR < 60. The administration record indicated the
medication was administered on 12/02/2025 by RN A. The hours of administration were documented as *6a
1. The blood pressure and pulse values for 12/02/2025 were documented as NA. NA was not defined on the
record. Record review of Resident #1's EMR Blood Presssure tab, undated and accessed 12/13/2025 at
11:33 a.m., revealed two (2) blood pressure values for 12/02/2025, 127/57 mmHg by RN A at 07:04 a.m.
and 150/69 mmHg by 09:26 p.m. by LPN B. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes dated
11/13/2025- 12/14/2025 did not reveal a progress note regarding the provision of Metoprolol Succinate
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
676216
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676216
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/15/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Remington Transitional Care of San Antonio
5423 Hamilton Wolfe Rd
San Antonio, TX 78229
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
on 12/02/2025 or a reassessment of Resident #1's blood pressure. Resident #1 was unavailable on
12/14/2025 and 12/15/2025 for observation or interview due to his status as an in-patient at a local military
hospital that does not allow visitation. During an interview on 12/14/2025 at 10:42 a.m., Resident #1's
family member and listed contact stated she had concerns regarding Resident #1's blood pressure
treatment at a prior facility, but she did not reveal concerns regarding his blood pressure treatment at the
facility he discharged from on 12/09/2025. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 03:13 p.m., MD C stated
he was providing care to Resident #1 while the resident was admitted to the facility. MD C denied having
had received notification of Resident #1's blood pressure having been below administration range for the
Metoprolol Succinate order. MD C stated he did not have concerns if RN A had administered Resident #1
the Metoprolol Succinate on 12/02/2025 if the DBP was at 57 mmHg and below the hold order. MD C
stated the only impact would have been that Resident #1 could have experienced some dizziness. During
an interview on 12/15/2025 at 03:35 p.m., RN A stated she couldn't recall administering Resident #1 his
Metoprolol Succinate on 12/02/2025 but stated she probably re-checked Resident #1's blood pressure prior
to administering since the initial DBP was outside the administration range. She stated she would re-check
a resident's blood pressure if the values seemed outside the resident's normal range or were outside the
administration range. She stated, if she had re-checked Resident #1's blood pressure, she probably didn't
document the new values. She stated the impact of not documenting the new values was that the
administration would show as a medication error. She stated she was aware the hold values for the
medication administration were written into the order and if she administered the medication when the
resident's blood pressure was already low, the medication could cause the resident's blood pressure to
drop even lower. She stated she would have continued to monitor Resident #1 throughout her shift on
12/02/2025. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 04:47 p.m., the DON stated *6a 1 for administration time
referred to medications scheduled to be administered between 06:00 a.m. to 01:00 p.m. The DON stated if
the medication order stated to hold if the DBP was below 60 mmHg and the measured DBP was 57 mmHg,
he would have expected the staff member to have contacted the physician. He stated, while reviewing
Resident #1's EMR, that he believed the administration documentation was in error because the EMR
would have triggered a warning to the administering nurse if the blood pressure was outside the
administration range. The DON stated the administering nurse could have prevented the error if she had
entered the repeat blood pressure she had obtained into the administration record. The DON revealed the
lack of documentation for the repeat blood pressure value would not have impacted Resident #1's care but
might result in the resident's physician questioning why Resident #1's DBP was low. The DON stated he
would have expected the administering nurse to have documented the new vitals by entering the repeat
vitals into the administration record or the vitals tab. Record review of facility policy, Documentation in
Medical Record, date implemented 10/24/2022, reflected Policy:Each resident's medical record shall
contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough
information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely
documentation.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Licensed staff and interdisciplinary team
members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical
record in accordance with state law and facility policy.2. Documentation shall be completed at the time of
service, but no later than the shift in which the assessment, observation, or care service occurred.3.
Principles of documentation include, but are not limited to: . b. Documentation shall be accurate, relevant,
and complete, containing sufficient details about the resident's care and/or responses to care.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676216
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2