Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Granite Mesa Health CenterCMS #6762201 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

676220 04/09/2025 Granite Mesa Health Center 1401 Max Copeland Dr Marble Falls, TX 78654
F 0695 Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Residents Affected - Few The facility failed to ensure RN A documented Resident #1's response to oxygen therapy after she administered a nebulizer treatment on 04/03/25. This deficient practice could place residents that receive oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate care and respiratory distress. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/06/25, reflected a BIMS was not conducted due to him rarely/never being understood. Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) reflected he did not require respiratory treatments. Review of Resident #1's admission care plan, dated 03/10/25, reflected he had a cerebral vascular accident with an intervention of taking vital signs and documenting them as ordered. Review of Resident #1's physician order, dated 03/15/25, reflected an order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML - 1 vial inhale orally three times a day for SOB. Review of Resident #1's MAR, dated April 2025, reflected he last received his nebulizer treatment on 04/03/25 at 9:14 PM. Review of Resident #1's progress notes in his EMR, on 04/09/25, reflected no documentation by RN A after the nebulizer treatment on 04/03/25 at 9:14 PM. Review of Resident #1's vitals in his EMR, on 04/09/25, reflected no vitals were taken after 3:37 PM on 04/03/25. During an interview on 04/09/25 at 10:53 AM, Resident #1's NP stated she would expect nurses to assess all residents within an hour after nebulizer treatments to ensure they were responsive to the Page 1 of 2 676220 676220 04/09/2025 Granite Mesa Health Center 1401 Max Copeland Dr Marble Falls, TX 78654
F 0695 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few treatment. She stated a negative outcome of not assessing after a treatment could be hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissues) or an increased pulse rate. During an interview on 04/09/25 at 12:40 PM, the DON stated if there was an acute change with a resident's vitals, such as low oxygen saturation or a high temperature, she would expect the nurses to continue to follow-up, monitor, and document their vitals throughout their shift or follow the orders from the NP. She stated a resident's vitals should be monitored after receiving oxygen therapy of any kind. She stated documentation was part of continuity of care and without it, the reader (of their EMR) could not get the whole view of the resident. She stated the resident could go without the care they needed, or their health could deteriorate. She stated she definitely had some education to do with the nurses after being informed of the lack of documentation/assessments by RN A after administering a nebulizer treatment to Resident #1. During an interview on 04/09/25 at 12:58 PM, RN A stated she did not follow up with Resident #1 after she administered the nebulizer treatment. She stated she should have assessed him 30 minutes after, and she must have forgotten. She stated it was important to assess after a nebulizer treatment to ensure the resident responded well to it and their heart rate had not increased significantly. Review of the facility's Documenting and Charting Policy, revised 07/2023, reflected the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide a complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, etc., as well as the progress of the resident's care. Review of the facility's Aerosol Drug Delivery Policy, revised 12/2023, reflected the following: Check pulse before and after procedure. If deviated from resident's baseline pulse, delay treatment and notify physician. 676220 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0695GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F695 - Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 9, 2025 survey of Granite Mesa Health Center?

This was a inspection survey of Granite Mesa Health Center on April 9, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Granite Mesa Health Center on April 9, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.