F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies,
intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that
accommodates resident preferences for one resident (Resident #21) of five residents reviewed for food
preferences.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's likes and dislikes food preferences were honored during the
lunch service on 02/06/23.
This failure could cause residents who ate meals from the kitchen at risk of not having their choices and
food preferences accommodated, possible weight loss, and a diminished quality of life.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 02/07/23, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who
admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and
major depressive disorder.
Review of Resident #21's undated Quarterly MDS Assessment reflected she had a BIMS score of 15
indicating no cognitive impairment.
In an interview on 01/30/23 at 12:00 PM with Resident #21 revealed she loved vegetables but only certain
ones. Resident #21 said she had given the kitchen staff a list of her likes and dislikes, including vegetables.
Resident #21 said she was still served vegetables she did not like even though her preferences were listed
on her meal ticket that came with her tray.
In an observation and interview with Resident #21 on 02/06/23 at 12:16 PM revealed she had just received
her lunch tray. Resident #21 said she saw the tray had vegetables on it including carrots which she had as
dislike on her meal ticket. Resident #21's lunch tray revealed mixed vegetables on it, including carrots.
Resident #21's meal ticket revealed no carrot on the top part and was placed on her tray [sic]. Resident #21
said she was not going to be able to eat the vegetables because she did not want to have to pick out all the
carrots.
In an interview on 02/06/23 at 12:48 PM with the DM revealed the facility used a meal tracker system that
was specialized for each person so that their dislikes showed up on their meal tickets. The DM said if for
example a resident did not like a certain vegetable it would show up as no and then the vegetable name on
the resident's meal ticket. The DM said if the kitchen was serving that vegetable, then they would not put
that on the resident's tray. The DM said he did not know that Resident
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
676237
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676237
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/07/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Belmont at Twin Creeks
999 Raintree Circle
Allen, TX 75013
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
#21 was served carrots today even though her meal ticket said no carrots at the top. The DM said the cook
did not read Resident #21's meal ticket and should not have served her the mixed vegetables with carrots
and should have given her an alternative vegetable.
In an interview on 02/06/23 at 1:04 PM with the Dietitian revealed she had met with Resident #21 about her
likes/dislikes/preferences. The Dietitian said she tried to check in with Resident #21 often because she was
picky about food. The Dietitian said the resident's' dislikes were on the meal tickets served with their trays.
The Dietitian said she saw Resident #21's meal ticket which reflected no carrots at the top which meant she
should have been served an alternate vegetable instead of the mixed vegetable today that included carrots.
In an interview on 02/06/23 at 1:17 PM with LVN A revealed she was Resident #21's nurse and had to go to
the kitchen about once a week to get an alternate vegetable because Resident #21 was served one that
she did not like.
In an interview on 02/07/23 at 9:30 AM with the DON revealed Resident #21 had filed a grievance last week
regarding food issues. The DON said Resident #21 reported wanting more vegetables but had no idea it
was regarding her not receiving her preferences. The DON said she had asked the DM to speak to
Resident #21 to discuss her likes/dislikes to update her preferences and was not sure if that had been done
or not.
In an interview on 02/07/23 at 10:53 AM with the Administrator revealed he was not aware that Resident
#21 was having issues with receiving food outside of her preferences. The Administrator said the kitchen
was responsible for ensuring the residents received the foods they liked. The Administrator said the kitchen
staff should review the meal ticket and offer an alternative or leave the item off the tray if it was listed as a
dislike for the resident. The Administrator did not give a concern with residents' preferences not being
honored.
Review of the facility's policy, revised 10/19, and titled Patient/Resident Nutrition Interview reflected: 5. Food
preferences will be honored as reasonable.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676237
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2