Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

THE BELMONT AT TWIN CREEKSCMS #6762371 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0806 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodates resident preferences for one resident (Resident #21) of five residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's likes and dislikes food preferences were honored during the lunch service on 02/06/23. This failure could cause residents who ate meals from the kitchen at risk of not having their choices and food preferences accommodated, possible weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 02/07/23, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #21's undated Quarterly MDS Assessment reflected she had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. In an interview on 01/30/23 at 12:00 PM with Resident #21 revealed she loved vegetables but only certain ones. Resident #21 said she had given the kitchen staff a list of her likes and dislikes, including vegetables. Resident #21 said she was still served vegetables she did not like even though her preferences were listed on her meal ticket that came with her tray. In an observation and interview with Resident #21 on 02/06/23 at 12:16 PM revealed she had just received her lunch tray. Resident #21 said she saw the tray had vegetables on it including carrots which she had as dislike on her meal ticket. Resident #21's lunch tray revealed mixed vegetables on it, including carrots. Resident #21's meal ticket revealed no carrot on the top part and was placed on her tray [sic]. Resident #21 said she was not going to be able to eat the vegetables because she did not want to have to pick out all the carrots. In an interview on 02/06/23 at 12:48 PM with the DM revealed the facility used a meal tracker system that was specialized for each person so that their dislikes showed up on their meal tickets. The DM said if for example a resident did not like a certain vegetable it would show up as no and then the vegetable name on the resident's meal ticket. The DM said if the kitchen was serving that vegetable, then they would not put that on the resident's tray. The DM said he did not know that Resident (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676237 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676237 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/07/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE The Belmont at Twin Creeks 999 Raintree Circle Allen, TX 75013 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0806 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few #21 was served carrots today even though her meal ticket said no carrots at the top. The DM said the cook did not read Resident #21's meal ticket and should not have served her the mixed vegetables with carrots and should have given her an alternative vegetable. In an interview on 02/06/23 at 1:04 PM with the Dietitian revealed she had met with Resident #21 about her likes/dislikes/preferences. The Dietitian said she tried to check in with Resident #21 often because she was picky about food. The Dietitian said the resident's' dislikes were on the meal tickets served with their trays. The Dietitian said she saw Resident #21's meal ticket which reflected no carrots at the top which meant she should have been served an alternate vegetable instead of the mixed vegetable today that included carrots. In an interview on 02/06/23 at 1:17 PM with LVN A revealed she was Resident #21's nurse and had to go to the kitchen about once a week to get an alternate vegetable because Resident #21 was served one that she did not like. In an interview on 02/07/23 at 9:30 AM with the DON revealed Resident #21 had filed a grievance last week regarding food issues. The DON said Resident #21 reported wanting more vegetables but had no idea it was regarding her not receiving her preferences. The DON said she had asked the DM to speak to Resident #21 to discuss her likes/dislikes to update her preferences and was not sure if that had been done or not. In an interview on 02/07/23 at 10:53 AM with the Administrator revealed he was not aware that Resident #21 was having issues with receiving food outside of her preferences. The Administrator said the kitchen was responsible for ensuring the residents received the foods they liked. The Administrator said the kitchen staff should review the meal ticket and offer an alternative or leave the item off the tray if it was listed as a dislike for the resident. The Administrator did not give a concern with residents' preferences not being honored. Review of the facility's policy, revised 10/19, and titled Patient/Resident Nutrition Interview reflected: 5. Food preferences will be honored as reasonable. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676237 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0806GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F806 - Food and drink

    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 7, 2023 survey of THE BELMONT AT TWIN CREEKS?

This was a inspection survey of THE BELMONT AT TWIN CREEKS on February 7, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at THE BELMONT AT TWIN CREEKS on February 7, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and pre..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.