F 0609
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper
authorities.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect
were reported immediately or no later than 24 hours for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for
abuse and neglect.
The facility failed to report to the State Agency an incident where Resident #1 eloped from the facility
without staff knowledge and was found approximately an hour later after he had fallen on railroad tracks
approximately one mile from the facility on 10/07/24.
This failure could place residents at risk of abuse or and neglect.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, history of falling, Parkinson's disease (a
movement disorder that affects the nervous system and worsens over time, cerebral infarction (stroke),
unsteadiness on feet, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away).
Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/14/24, reflected a BIMS of 12, indicating a
moderate cognitive impairment. Section E (Behavior) reflected the behavior of wandering was not exhibited.
Review of Resident #1's quarterly care plan, reflected he was at risk for falls r/t poor safety awareness and
mobility with an intervention of therapy to evaluate and treat.
Review of Resident #1's most recent Fall Risk Assessment, dated 06/09/24, reflected a score of 14 (a
score of 10 or higher represented a high risk for falls).
Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 12/01/23, reflected a score of 3 (a score of 5
or higher represented a high risk of elopement).
Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 10/10/24, reflected a score of 13 (a score of 5
or higher represented a high risk of elopement).
Review of Resident #1's progress notes in his EMR, dated 10/07/24, reflected the following: [Resident #1]
left facility without signing out and facility staff received a call that [Resident #1] had fell while he was away .
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
676292
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0609
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 10/10/24 at 2:34 PM, the CRN stated the facility found out Resident #1 was missing
on 10/07/24 when EMS called to inform them, he (Resident #1) was found on the railroad tracks
approximately a mile from the facility. The CRN stated the train station contacted the police who then
contacted EMS. The CRN stated he was assessed with no injuries and brought back to the facility. The
ADM stated he had not self-reported this incident to HHSC because Resident #1 was his own RP, he was
not injured, the weather was not bad that day, and he had not missed any doses of medication. He stated
he was not informed that he had fallen on the railroad tracks. The ADM stated if he would have known
about that part, he would have reported it. The CRN stated (and the ADM agreed) that the definition of
elopement was a resident who left the facility and was in harm's way mainly because of their cognition or
could not make good decisions because of a diagnosis of dementia. The ADM stated if a resident wanted to
leave, and they were their own RP, and their BIMS was high enough, then they were able to leave. The
ADM stated the importance of notifying the staff they were leaving was to help them make good decisions.
The ADM stated he thought Resident #1 did sign out but did not tell anyone where he was going. The ADM
stated no one really knew how long had had been missing, but he could not imagine it had been more than
one hour. The ADM stated a negative outcome of a resident not following their OOP protocols was that they
could get very hurt.
Review of the facility's Preventing Resident Abuse Policy, revised November of 2010, reflected no mention
of when abuse or neglect should be self-reported to HHSC.
Review of the Long-Term Care Regulation Provider Letter (PL 2024-14), dated 08/29/24, reflected the
following:
Do report, immediately, but no later than 24 hours after the incident occurs or is suspected, an accident that
does not result in serious bodily injury but that involves any of the following: neglect, a missing resident .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained
as free of accident hazards possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one
(Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not missing from the facility on 10/07/24 for an unknown
amount of time until EMS contacted and notified them that he was approximately .9 miles away and had
fallen and found on the railroad tracks. Approximately 500 feet from the facility was a busy highway with
through traffic of commercial vehicles to include semi-trucks.
This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/10/24 at 2:47 PM and an IJ
template was given. While the IJ was removed on 10/11/24 at 2:38 PM, the facility remained out of
compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the
facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unsafe elopements, falls, injuries, dehydration, and
hospitalization.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, history of falling, Parkinson's disease (a
movement disorder that affects the nervous system and worsens over time, cerebral infarction (stroke),
unsteadiness on feet, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away).
Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/14/24, reflected a BIMS of 12, indicating a
moderate cognitive impairment. Section E (Behavior) reflected the behavior of wandering was not exhibited.
Review of Resident #1's quarterly care plan, dated 09/17/224, reflected he was at risk for falls r/t poor
safety awareness and mobility with an intervention of therapy to evaluate and treat.
Review of Resident #1's most recent Fall Risk Assessment, dated 06/09/24, reflected a score of 14 (a
score of 10 or higher represented a high risk for falls).
Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 12/01/23, reflected a score of 3 (a score of 5
or higher represented a high risk of elopement).
Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 10/10/24, reflected a score of 13 (a score of 5
or higher represented a high risk of elopement).
Review of Resident #1's progress notes in his EMR, dated 10/07/24 at 1:15 PM and documented by LVN A,
reflected the following:
[Resident #1] left facility without signing out and facility staff received a call that [Resident #1] had fell while
he was away .
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
During an observation and interview on 10/10/24 at 9:55 AM, revealed Resident #1 sitting on his bed with
his head dropped down towards his chest. He was asked if he remembered leaving the facility a few days
ago and he had a blank stare. He was asked if he had fallen and he nodded his head yes. He was asked if
he had been injured and he shook his head no. When he was asked if he could explain what happened in
more detail, he began drawing with his finger on his blanket. He continued to have a blank stare.
During an interview on 10/10/24 at 10:06 AM, LVN B stated she was familiar with Resident #1. She stated
she was not working the day he went missing but she did hear about it. She stated she did not believe he
signed out or notified anyone that he was leaving. She stated he sometimes is was alert and oriented x3
(person, place, and time) but his baseline was alert and oriented x2. She stated he would absolutely not be
safe to be walking out in the community by himself. She stated when residents leave OOP, they need to
sign out and notify the nurse.
During an interview on 10/10/24 at 10:18 AM, the RRC stated on 10/07/24 she got a call from a staff
member that Resident #1 was gone and was found by the (grocery store) about a mile away. She stated
she, the HR Director, and AD went to go get him. She stated when they arrived, he was sitting in his rolling
walker with EMS. She stated he told them he was going to (grocery store) for some ice cream. She stated
the EMT's informed them he had been found on the railroad tracks and the train station had contacted the
police, who had contacted them. The EMT's informed them he was okay and they took him back to the
facility. She stated when residents leave OOP, they were expected to notify their nurse and sign themselves
out. She stated she was not sure if he did that as she had not followed up on that part. She stated she was
not sure how long he was gone but did believe he had the ability to leave the facility unsupervised.
During a telephone interview on 10/10/24 at 10:34 AM, the MD stated Resident #1 looked normal, but when
you assessed him in detail - he was slow to think. He stated he was not always oriented and was often
confused. He stated the streets around the facility were extremely busy and he would need supervision if
he left the facility grounds.
During a telephone interview on 10/10/24 at 10:51 AM, Resident #1's FM C stated she was notified that he
left the faciity on [DATE]. She stated, in her opinion, he should not be able to leave the facility alone at all
due him hardly being able to walk. She stated he was not safe to be unsupervised outside of the facility.
She stated she last saw him in August (2024).
An attempt to interview CNA D by telephone was made on 10/10/24 at 11:59 AM and 2:01 PM. A returned
call was not received prior to exit. CNA D worked the morning Resident #1 left the facility (10/07/24).
During a telephone interview on 10/10/24 at 2:06 PM, CNA E stated he worked the afternoon shift on
10/07/24. He stated Resident #1 may sometimes have the ability to be unsupervised if he left the facility,
but he was sometimes nonverbal. He stated his cognition varied day-to-day. He stated Resident #1 would
not be able to remember the rules to sign out before leaving OOP.
During an interview on 10/10/24 at 2:27 PM, the NP stated he was notified of the incident with Resident #1
on 10/07/24. He stated he did not remember if he was told how long he had been gone from the facility. He
stated he did not believe Resident #1 could be out in the community unsupervised due to both physical and
cognitive reasons, but more so cognitively. He stated he was very cognitively impaired and was not there.
He stated he did not believe he could understand the process of signing
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
out even if you were to explain it to him. He stated it was a very unsafe area to be out in. NP stated he
definitely believed the facility needed to come up with safer protocols should the residents want to leave the
facility.
During a telephone interview on 10/10/24 at 3:54 PM, LVN A stated she worked the morning of 10/07/24.
She stated it was her first time working at the facility as she was an agency nurse. She stated the other
scheduled nurse that day had called out to work so she was the only nurse working the shift and it was a
very hectic morning. She stated she did not know around what time Resident #1 left the facility but knew he
returned around 11:45 AM. LVN A stated due to it being her first time to work at the facility, she was unable
to speak on Resident #1's cognitive abilities.
During an interview on 10/10/24 at 2:34 PM, the CRN stated the facility found out Resident #1 was missing
on 10/07/24 when EMS called to inform them, he (Resident #1) was found on the railroad tracks
approximately a mile from the facility. The CRN stated the train station contacted the police who then
contacted EMS. The CRN stated he was assessed with no injuries and brought back to the facility. The
CRN stated (and the ADM agreed) that the definition of elopement was a resident who left the facility and
was in harm's way mainly because of their cognition or could not make good decisions because of a
diagnosis of dementia. The ADM stated if a resident wanted to leave, and they were their own RP, and their
BIMS was high enough, then they were able to leave. The ADM stated the importance of notifying the staff
they were leaving was to help them make good decisions. The ADM stated he thought Resident #1 did sign
out but did not tell anyone where he was going. The ADM stated no one really knew how long he had had
been missing, but he could not imagine it had been more than one hour. The ADM stated a negative
outcome of a resident not following their OOP protocols was that they could get very hurt.
Observation made on 10/10/24 at 8:30 AM revealed the highway approximately 500 feet from the facility
was busy and saturated with cars.
Review of the facility's Signing Residents Out Policy, Revised August 2006, reflected the following:
1. Each resident leaving the premises (excluding transfers/discharges) must be signed out.
2. A sign-out register is located at each nurses' station. Registers must indicate the resident's expected time
of return.
The ADM and CRN were notified on 10/10/24 at 2:47 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy had been identified
due to the above failures and an IJ template was provided.
The following POR was accepted on 10/10/24 at 5:47 PM:
On 10/10/24, an abbreviated survey was initiated. 0n 10/10/24, the surveyor provided an Immediate
Jeopardy notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility
constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety.
The notification of Immediate states jeopardy as follows: The facility failed to ensure that resident #1 was
not missing from the facility for an unknown amount of time until contacted by EMS.
Action: Resident #1 was immediately placed on 1:1 oversight. A full- house the interdisciplinary
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
team completed check to validate that all residents were accounted for. The resident is on therapy and
received treatment by physical therapy on 10/7/24.
Start Date: 10/10/24.
Completion Date: 10/10/2024
Residents Affected - Few
Responsible: Administrator
Action: A secured facility will be located for resident #1
Start Date: 10/10/2024.
Completion Date: open (1:1 oversight will remain until placement is found)
Responsible: Administrator
Action: All residents residing in the facility will have an updated Elopement Assessment completed and
reviewed by the Administrator and the Regional Nurse for being at risk of leaving the facility. The Any
nursing management nurses completed these assessments. Residents identified as being at risk as
identified by a score over a 5 on the risk assessment will be evaluated further by the IDT to determine
safety interventions. Residents will have an elopement assessment completed with their quarterly MDS and
with any change of condition by nursing management. All scores and concerns will be reviewed by the
interdisciplinary team and recommendations/interventions implemented.
The regional nurse educated the administrator on processes for the residents to follow. The administrator
educated the residents on the process of notifying facility staff of their desire to leave the facility for any
reason. The facility staff will then sign off with the resident in the sign out book. Any concerns will be
discussed with the administrator/designee before the resident will be given permission to leave the facility.
The nursing management educated the facility staff on the process for residents signing out and monitoring
the residents at least every hour to validate that everyone is accounted for. Any concerns will be brought to
the attention of the administrator/designee. Staff, including PRN and agency not receiving the initial
education will be required to receive it before starting their next assigned shift.
Start Date: 10/10/2024.
Completion Date: 10/11/24
Responsible: Administrator
Action: An ad hoc QAPI meeting was completed with the medical director and the interdisciplinary team to
discuss this plan of removal.
Start Date: 10/10/24.
Completion Date: 10/10/24
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Responsible: Administrator
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Action: Any new admissions, ongoing, will have an elopement assessment completed, and interventions
implemented if indicated, upon admission. The administrator/designee will review the elopement
assessment to determine concerns.
Residents Affected - Few
Start Date: 10/10/24
Completion Date: Ongoing
Completion Date
Responsible: Administrator
Action: The administrator initiated an Abuse and Neglect in-service with facility staff.
Start Date: 10/10/24
Completion Date: 10/11/24
Responsible: Administrator
The Surveyor monitored the POR on 10/11/24 as followed:
Observations made on 10/11/24 from 12:38 PM - 2:31 PM revealed CNA F outside Resident #1's room
while he was sleeping. She stated when he left his room, she stayed with him to ensure his safety.
During an interview on 10/11/24 at 12:42 PM, the CRN stated elopement risk assessments had been
completed on all residents and there was only one (excluding Resident #1) who scored as high. She stated
the resident often went out on pass and was very responsible. She stated he always notified a nurse that he
was going to the (grocery store) and signed himself out and in when he returned. She stated all staff,
including agency staff, were being in-serviced before their shifts. She stated the ADM had spoken with
residents in groups to remind them of the OOP protocols.
During interviews on 10/11/24 from 12:50 PM - 2:18 PM, staff from all shifts, including the AD, one HSK,
three LVNs, and three CNAs all stated they were in-serviced prior to their shift on abuse and neglect and
residents leaving the facility and resident supervision. All staff members knew that their ADM was their
Abuse and Neglect Coordinator and that he should be notified any time there were any suspicions of abuse
or neglect. They were all able to give examples of abuse such as verbal, physical, emotional, and
psychosocial. They all stated a head count should be completed for each resident at least every hour. They
all knew that if a resident wanted to leave the facility, the charge nurse needed to be notified and the
resident needed to sign out. They all stated the importance for the protocols was to ensure all residents
were accounted for, the staff knew where all residents were, who they went with, where they went, and an
ETA for their return. The nurses stated they knew which residents were able to go OOP independently by
the residents' elopement risk assessments and there was also a list in the sign-out book. All staff stated the
facility was responsible for the residents' safety at all times.
Review of the facility's QAPI meeting agenda, dated 10/10/24, reflected the ADM, the CRN, the RRC,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676292
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St
Luling, TX 78648
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
the ADON, the AD, the HRD, and MD were in attendance.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Review of four residents' (including Resident #1) Elopement Risk Assessments in their EMR, on 10/11/24,
reflected they had all been completed on 10/10/24.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of in-services dated 10/10/24 - 10/11/24 and conducted by the ADM, reflected all staff were
in-serviced on ANE - All allegations must be reported immediately to the ADM, the Abuse Coordinator.
Review of in-services, dated 10/10/24 - 10/11/24 and conducted by the CRN, reflected all staff were
in-serviced on the following:
It is our responsibility at (facility) to keep the residents safe from harm. The interdisciplinary team and
front-line nursing staff must regularly round to identify any residents that are missing and quickly intervene.
Staff will follow this process:
1. If a resident wants to leave the facility grounds, they have been instructed to notify a staff member. That
staff member must sign off in the sign out book as well as the resident signing.
2. If you are not sure if a resident can sign himself out and leave the grounds, you must ask a management
team member; ADM, DON, ADON, HR, before agreeing to allow them to leave the facility grounds.
3. Any concerns must be brought up to the immediate attention of the management or the nurse in charge,
if management is not available.
4. Walking rounds must be done every hour to make sure that all residents are accounted for and on facility
grounds. Any concerns must be acted upon immediately.
Review of in-services, dated 10/10/24 and conducted by the ADM, reflected residents were in-serviced on
the following:
Any resident who leaves the facility and does not sign out and provide information such as where you are
going, when you will return, and who you are going with will be placed in another facility which may be a
secure unit. Staff and resident will enter the entry in the sign-out book.
While the IJ was removed on 10/11/24 at 2:38 PM, the facility remained at a level of no actual harm at a
scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of
the corrective systems.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676292
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8