F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered
care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's
medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for
care plans, in that:
1. The facility failed to care plan for Resident #1's 05/11/25 orthopedic ordered left arm sling prescribed for
comfort, no discontinue date.
2 The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's history of refusal of care and medication from 12/07/2024
and 05/09/25.
This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the benefit of prescribed orthopedic equipment, risk of
pain and discomfort and a lack of goals and interventions for the residents' individual needs for
person-centered care.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/06/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to
the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side
of the body), cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery (a
type of stroke caused by reduced or blocked blood flow to the brain), and other cerebral infarction due to
occlusion or stenosis of small artery ( ischemic strokes, caused by the blockage or narrowing of smaller
arteries within the brain).
Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/12/25, reflected a BIMS score of 13,
indicating no cognitive impairment. Section GG (Functional Abilities) reflected he was impaired on one side
of both upper and lower extremities.
Review of Resident #1's care plan reflected no identified problems, goals, or interventions for his prescribed
left arm sling or his history of refusal of care and medication.
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 12/07/2024 reflected, notified by CNA
staff was in room to adjust pt in bed and to be check and change if needed pt refuse c/not [sic] right now
maybe later
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 12/08/2024 reflected, Enoxaparin
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
676299
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676299
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente
9801 S 1st Street
Austin, TX 78748
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Sodium Injection Solution Prefilled Syringe (prefilled syringe is a medication used to prevent and treat blood
clots) 30 MG/0.3ML Inject 1 dose subcutaneously (under the skin) every 12 hours for anticoagulant
(medications that prevent blood clots from forming) [Resident #1] refuse c/o too much medication has been
given and will make him sick
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 01/05/25 reflected, give 12 grams by
mouth two times a day constipation Mix with 4-8 oz of liquid resident refuse
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 01/21/25 reflected Np on call notified
resident refuse 10 units of Lantus (insulin) this am
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 03/28/25 reflected, resident refuse
dinner wife @ bedside alternate taken to room (steak fingers) refuse yelling @ nurse, 'I don't want that'
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 04/10/25 reflected pain medication
was offered to Resident #1 and he stated, I don't want noting. I don't want anything from you. i don't want
anything from anybody I'm fine.
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Progress Note by LVN A dated 05/09/25 reflected Resident #1 refusal
for staff to assist pt back in bed.
Record review on 06/06/25 of Nurses Note by the DON dated 05/09/25 reflected, Apply left arm sling for
comfort as tolerated. one time a day for Left arm healing
Record review on 06/06/25 of Resident #1's order dated 05/11/25, entered by the DO reflected Apply left
arm sling for comfort as tolerated. one time a day for Left arm healing.
Record review on 06/06/15 of Nurses Note by LVN A dated 05/25/25 reflected, Apply left arm sling for
comfort as tolerated. one time a day for Left arm healing.
Interview on 06/06/25 at 12:24 pm with Resident #1 reflected he had a sling for his left arm, but they did not
put it on him. He said they used to, but they did not put it on him anymore he said his left arm hurt a lot.
Interview on 06/06/25 at 4:05 with LVN B reflected she put Resident #1's left arm sling on him daily if he
wanted her to. She said, at times, he would agree to wear it, and the next time she entered his room, he
would have removed it. She said he was, not a very big fan for it. She said that he had two or three left arm
slings, and there is one he liked better than the other. She said the one he liked was blue and soft and in
the neck area there was some padding, and that was the one he would be more compliant to wear. She
said there had been times when Resident #1 had refused to wear the left arm sling. She said he would say,
maybe later or that thing just does not work. She said she attended facility daily staff morning meetings,
and they discussed Resident #1 and his left arm sling. She said Resident #1's left arm sling was discussed
more when it was first introduced and not very much after, maybe because he was not wearing it as much.
LVN B said the care plan contained the interventions for the residents to be at their best functioning. She
said she did not look at care plans every day, but she found them helpful. She said that if a resident had an
order for equipment, it should be included in the care plan. She said she did not think Resident #1's left arm
sling was helping him, and because it was not helping him, it did not need to be included in the care plan.
She said
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676299
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676299
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente
9801 S 1st Street
Austin, TX 78748
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
the social worker, the MDS Coordinator and the DON were responsible for the care plans. She said care
plans were not the responsibility of the floor nurses. She said that resident noncompliance should be
included in the care plan and Resident #1's noncompliance with his left arm sling should have been
included in the care plan. She said, in the past, Resident #1 had refused to take his medications and had a
history to telling the staff No to care.
Residents Affected - Few
Interview on 06/06/25 at 3:10 pm with LVN/MDSC revealed she was responsible for care plans and the
updating of care plans, and stated that resident diagnoses, resident behaviors, and resident orthotics
should be care planned. She said she was not a floor nurse, but she got information for care planning
during the facility daily staff morning meetings. She said floor nurses would provide updates regarding
behaviors from the previous day that needed to be added to the care plan. She said she relied on the floor
nurses, the nurse manager, the DON, and the ADONs to help with the information to update care plans.
She said a care plan was a tool used to determine a problem and it has a set of goals and interventions for
the resident needs. She said the floor staff knew best know how to care for a resident. She said a care plan
was necessary because it let the team know what the residents' needs were. She said if someone had a
sling, it should be included in the care plan. She said the possible negative outcome, if care plans were not
updated, was that certain care might not be provided to the resident, or the nurses might not know how to
manage a problem. She said Resident #1's refusal to wear the sling should definitely be care planned. She
said the sling was prescribed for comfort and to hopefully minimize some of Resident #1's pain.
Interview on 06/06/25 at 4:52 pm with the Administrator reflected a care plan was the comprehensive tool
used to direct specific resident centered care. He stated the MDS nurses are responsible for the care plans.
He said the MDS Coordinators were not floor nurses, and they received the information to updated
residents' care plans from information received from resident care reports facility daily staff morning
meetings, and talking to the floor nurses. The Administrator revealed that Resident #1's left arm sling
should have been included in the care plan. He said it was the responsibility of the MDS Coordinators to
make sure residents have everything in the care plan. It was the responsibility of the DON or the regional
care management specialist to make sure the care plan was accurate. The negative effects of not having a
complete care plan were that the resident could receive inadequate care.
Interview on 06/06/25 at 1:29 pm with the DON reflected Resident #1 had a specific sling that he liked to
use when he allowed staff to put his left arm sling on for him. The DON said that more than 50% of the time,
Resident #1 did not allow staff to put the sling on Resident #1. The DON said that during the facility daily
morning staff meetings, it had been discussed that Resident #1 either refused to wear the left arm sling or
removed the left arm sling, and it ended up on the floor. The DON stated that Resident #1's prescribed arm
sling should be care planned. The possible outcome of Resident #1 not wearing his sling was discomfort
and improper healing. She stated that it was upsetting and bothersome that Resident #1's left arm sling is
not care planned, and that his refusal to wear his sling was not care planned. The DON said the importance
of a care plan was that it set forth the care for the resident that included a resident's medical and behavioral
orders how orders should be followed. She stated that if Resident #1 choses the use of one specific left arm
sling over another left arm sling, this information should have been in the care plan. The DON said Resident
#1 preferred the sling that had the pad on the strap towards the back, but that was not the sling that was in
his room. She said the care plan was the responsibility of the MDS Coordinator, and the MDS Coordinator
was not a floor nurse but Resident #1's non-compliance with his sling usage was discussed in the facility
morning meetings when the MDS coordinator was present. The DON said Resident #1's other
non-compliant behaviors were discussed in the facility morning meetings when
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676299
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676299
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente
9801 S 1st Street
Austin, TX 78748
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
the MDS Coordinator was present. She said she believed Resident #1's non-compliance with his left arm
sling was discussed about 3 times during morning meeting, and his other non-compliance behaviors were
discussed pretty frequent. She said it was the responsibility of the DON to follow up and make sure resident
care plans were complete with information that was discussed during morning meetings. The DON said that
if a care plan was not updated, resident care could be neglected and not carried out for both the resident's
mental and physical needs.
Interview on 06/06/25 at 3:51 pm with the NP revealed Resident #1 had an old fracture to his left elbow and
the issue with his left arm sling was Resident #1's lack of compliance. She said the nurses would put the
sling on him and Resident #1 would remove it and shove it in a drawer. She said that he had told her that
no one was giving him his left arm sling to wear. She said the order for the left arm sling was given to
Resident #1 by the by the orthopedic doctor for comfort.
Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans dated 10/24/22, reflected it was the policy of the
facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent,
with resident rights that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical,
nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive
assessment. Person centered means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the
resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives. The comprehensive care plan
will include measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents needs as identified in the
residents' comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the residents' progress.
Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676299
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4