F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as
free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision
and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 7 resident (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for
accidents and supervision.
1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A appropriately transferred Resident #1 who was identified as a two
person assist for bed mobility. Resident #1 was assisted by CNA A for ADL care on [DATE]. CNA A rolled
Resident #1 over in the bed, he fell and broke both hips.
2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, who could not bear weight and was identified as a Hoyer lift
transfer, was transferred using a Hoyer lift. CNA C transferred Resident #2 using a stand and pivot transfer
on [DATE]. Two days later an x ray report indicated the resident had a fractured hip. There was no other
occurrence identified that could have caused the injury.
The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on [DATE] and ended [DATE]. The facility had
corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.
These failures could place residents at risk of serious harm, pain and serious injury.
Findings include:
1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was last admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included limitation of activities due to disability,
abnormalities of gait and mobility, unspecified lack of coordination, a loss of bone density and muscle
weakness.
Record review of Resident #1's census report indicated his initial date of admission to the facility was
[DATE].
Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated he had intact cognition with a
BIMS( a score used to assess cognitive function in long term care settings) score of 14. Resident #1 was
totally dependent of staff for toileting and hygiene. He was totally dependent of staff requiring the assist of
two or more helpers for siting to laying and lying to sitting on the side of the bed.
Record review of Resident #1 care plan with a problem of falls related to mobility. Approaches,
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 9
Event ID:
676300
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
dated [DATE], were to provide extensive assistance for transferring via a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 was
identified with a problem of incontinence of bowel and bladder. An approach, dated [DATE], indicated to
provide extensive assistance for toileting. A Problem start date of [DATE] indicated the resident fell/slid from
his bed with fractures. Some of the interventions were to re-educate the resident was a two person assist
with bed mobility, and peri care to help reduce the risk of falls/slides. The bed was to be in the lowest
position.
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #1's Resident Profile (a description of resident needs for aides to follow when
providing care according to the DON) indicated his ADL status, dated [DATE], for toileting required the
assistance of two people and his bed mobility was listed as extensive with the assistance of two people.
Resident #1's transfer assistance indicated two people assist via Hoyer lift.
Record review of Resident #1's nursing note, dated [DATE] at 10:19 p.m., indicated LVN B as called to
Resident #1's room around 7:20 p.m. CNA A aid she was changing Resident #1 and he slid out of the bed
while she had him roll unto his side. Resident #1 was yelling his hips were hurting. The resident was
assessed. Two additional aides came in to assist with cleaning feces off the floor and covered the resident
with a blanket. The staff were instructed not to move the resident and 911 was called. The resident was
given fentanyl via nasal inhalation by EMS to relieve some pain so the resident could be moved to have the
Hoyer sling placed under him. The resident left the facility with EMS at 7:42 p.m. The hospital was
contacted at 10:20 p.m. and they stated Resident #1 had fractures in each hip.
Record review of the facility's Provider Investigation Report indicated the incident occurred on [DATE] at
8:00 p.m. CNA A provided ADL care to Resident #1 alone and fell out of bed. Resident #1 was care
planned for a two person assist. The nurse assessed Resident #1 and he was sent to the ER. The hospital
called later in the evening to say Resident #1 suffered fractures to the right and left hips. Resident #1 was
care planned for a two person assist for quite some time. All staff interviewed on the hall reported being
aware of this and always ensured they had assistance when changing Resident #1. CNA A stated she
provided care to Resident #1 in the past without assistance. She was aware of how to use the POC kiosk
and where to find Resident #1's care plan. CNA A willfully chose to ignore the plan of care and make and
independent decision to provide incontinent care to Resident #1 by herself and paced the resident at
needless risk resulting in a fall.
Record review of Resident #1's hospital records, dated [DATE], indicated he had a fall from his bed at the
nursing home. His imaging demonstrated he sustained multiple orthopedic injuries which included right and
left hip fractures. Review of the CT (imaging that uses x rays and computer technology to create detailed
images of the inside of the body) of the pelvis on [DATE] at 11:24 p.m. indicated acute comminuted
(fracture where bone breaks in three or more fragments) fracture of the left and right hips.
Record review of Resident #1's computerized physician orders indicated he had an order, dated [DATE], for
Tramadol 50mg every six hours PRN for bone density and structure disorders. He had an order dated
[DATE] for alprazolam 0.25 mg for anxiety at bedtime and PRN. He had an order, dated [DATE], for
hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 1 table for fracture, every 6 hours PRN.
Record review CNA A's statement taken by the HR director on [DATE] at 12:00 p.m. indicated CNA A said
she was scheduled to work until 7:00 p.m. on [DATE]. The statement indicated CNA A said around 7:30
p.m. she went into Resident #1's room to change him like she always changed him, and during the process
she realized the whole bed was wet. She said she was standing on the far side of the bed next
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
to the window. Resident #1 used the grab bar to turn away from her and hold on. CNA A said Resident #1
had neuropathy in his hands and feet. As she was changing him, she guessed his hand became weak. She
saw his feet fall off the bed. She said Resident #1 fell off the other side of the bed, he started to yell that he
was falling. CNA A said she was reaching for him to prevent his fall and hurt her back. She said he fell feet
first onto the floor. She said she was yelling, and he was yelling, and the other CNA came into the room
after he was already on the floor.
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of a statement written by LVN B indicated on [DATE] when she entered the room Resident
#1 was lying on the floor next to his bed that was in the high position. Resident #1's head was positioned
towards the foot of the bed. Resident #1 was yelling it hurts, it hurts. The statement indicated 911 was
called.
Record review of Resident #1's nursing note, dated [DATE] at 2:02 a.m., indicated the resident was back
from the hospital. He had a diagnosis of bilateral subtrochanteric femur fractures. PRN Tramadol 5mg was
given. The medication was not effective. The resident was yelling out in pain. When asked if he would like to
go back to the ER for further evaluation the resident refused. The nurse and aide tried to reposition the
resident. The resident was unable to get comfortable.
Record review of Resident #1's nursing notes, dated [DATE] at 11:24 a.m., indicated the resident was sent
back to the hospital due to symptoms of severe anemia(lack of blood).
Record review of Resident #1's nursing note, dated [DATE] at 2:55 p.m., indicated Resident returned from
the hospital with a new order for alprazolam 0.25 mg as needed for sleep.
Record review of Resident #1's nursing note, dated [DATE] at 12:55 a.m., indicated Resident #1
complained of discomfort when changed or repositioned. PRN pain medications were given.
Record review of nursing note, dated [DATE] at 11:01 a.m., indicated new order to change hydrocodone
/acetaminophen 5-325 every 6 hours routine medication.
Record review of a nurse's note, dated [DATE] at11:23 a.m. indicated a new order to change to discontinue
alprazolam 0.25 PRN and to start lorazepam 0.5 tablet for anxiety.
Record a review of a nurses note, dated [DATE] at 2:59 p.m., indicated Resident #1 had 3 plus edemas
noted. He complained of pain in the left ankle and foot. The physician was notified, and a new order was
received to send him to the ER.
Record review of Resident #1's nurses note, dated [DATE] at 2:05 p.m., indicated and a referral was
received for hospice related to uncontrollable pain with symptoms of bilateral hip fracture and recent
decline.
Record review of a nurse's note, dated [DATE] at 2:13 a.m., indicated Resident #1 was admitted to hospice
with a terminal diagnosis of systolic congestive heart failure (Heart failure where the left ventricle cannot
pump blood efficiently) he had new orders for morphine 0.5 ml every two hours PRN as needed for pain,
lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet take one every four hours PRN for anxiety. To discontinue the hydrocodone and
began Hydrocodone acetaminophen 10/325 every 6 hours PRN. Acetaminophen 650 mg to administer one
suppository rectally every 4 hours PRN for pain or temperature.
During an interview on [DATE] at 1:50 p.m., the DON said Resident #1 was a 2 person assist with ADL
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
care. She said it clearly stated in his plan of care documentation. She said Resident #1 did not have the
ability to grip and hold on to the handrail on the bed. The DON said she was confused by CNA A's
behaviors that day, CNA A's shift ended at 7:00 p.m. The DON said the other aides on the hall thought she
already left for the day, instead she was in the room providing care to Resident #1 at about 7:30 p.m. She
said CNA A was suspended and terminated, she did not work again after the incident. The DON said the
fall caused Resident #1 to break both femurs. The DON said when the aide was providing care to him, she
had the bed in the highest position when she rolled him. She said according to the aide and the resident
interviews his legs fell off the side of the bed and he followed. The DON said Resident #1's legs hit the floor
first. She said CNA A worked at the facility for 6 or 8 months, and the aides rotated different halls. The DON
said that was not her first time working with Resident #1.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:20 p.m., Resident #1 said he remembered the incident when CNA A
was in changing him and he rolled out of bed. He said she changed him in the past unassisted and he had
no worries at first. He said the other staff always had two people to assist him. Resident #1 said she was by
the window, and he was facing the door. He said his feet just slipped off the bed. He said he was in shock
when he felt the rest of his body began to follow. He said he had been in pain ever since the fall. Resident
#1 said since that time it was always two staff who provided care to him and he was fine. Resident #1 said
the facility changed his pain medications, the pain was better, but he just felt like he would always be in
pain.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:09 p.m., the Administrator said Resident #1 said CNA A changed him
alone before. The Administrator said Resident #1 said CNA A was the only one who provided him care
unassisted.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:26 p.m., the DON said the facility's Mitigation plan for Resident #1 was
completed immediately. The DON said agency staff were in serviced as they came into work. She said in
services began on [DATE] and were still on going for Agency and PRN staff. She said the staff were
in-serviced on instructions for how to enter the plan of care information for the resident's profile. The DON
said the resident profile was used by the CNAs to determine the level of care to provide to residents. She
said in Mitigation plan they went back 2 weeks and monitored for trends and there were not any problems
identified. She said they talked about accidents/incidents in morning meeting and made sure nothing was
identified. The DON said each day she looked at the schedule to determine if they had new staff or staff
that had not been in serviced. She said CNA A knew how to get in the Kiosk and she knew where the
pocket worksheets were. The DON said there was a binder on the hall by the Kiosk with the resident
profiles in it. She said the Mitigation plan included in services for aides and nurses. She said the aides had
to do a return demonstration on the kiosk to show they knew how to use it correctly.
During an interview on [DATE] at 4:20 p.m., CNA D said she was agency staff, but she worked at the facility
often. She said she had taken care of Resident #1 in the past and it took two people to change him or
transfer him. She said he had not gotten up since his fall. She said on the evening of [DATE] she was
working down the hall. She said CNA A should have left the facility at 7:00 p.m. She said CNA A told them
she was going to provide care to another resident and leave. CNA D said they did not know she was doing
care with Resident #1 independently. CNA D said she heard hollering and CNA A was coming out of
Resident #1's room hollering hysterically. She said prior to the incident CNA A did not ask for help. CNA D
said Resident #1 was heavy, his body was stiff, and he was an extensive assist with care. She said it was
on his care plan that he required two people. She said he could grab onto the bar and hold but she did not
know how long he could hold. She had he had special utensils
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
to assist him with eating, however he did have some issues with these hands. She said they were in
serviced on providing care to him and other residents. She said she worked agency and always used the
resident care plan/profiles so she was familiar with the resident care needs.
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:15 p.m., the DON said initially Resident #1 came back from the hospital
with Norco PRN every 6 hours for pain. She said the medications did not control his pain. The DON said he
was sent out to the hospital on two different occasions since he came back from the broken femurs. She
said the doctors would not work with them at the hospital for pain control. She said Resident #1 had several
pain medication changes. She said they had talked to him and placed him on hospice services so he could
receive some medications that would control his pain. She said the resident refused to have surgery at the
hospital. He was basically bed fast before and did not see the need to undergo surgery.
During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 1:52 p.m., CNA A said on [DATE] she had gone into Resident
#1's room to provide incontinent care. She said she was supposed to leave at 7:00 p.m. but stayed to help
the other aides out. CNA A said she was changing Resident #1 like she normally did, unassisted. She said
when she started to change him, she realized the whole bed was wet. CNA A said she had to do an
occupied bed change. She said it was something she did daily. She said when she was trying to roll the
sheet to pull him back over his feet had neuropathy and they slid off the side of the bed. She said her first
reaction was to grab, him, but he was not a little guy he weighed about 300 pounds, and she hurt her back.
She said she would never ever intentionally hurt a resident. She said she saw him slip and she tried to
catch him before he fell. CNA A said she did not know he was a two person assist. She was reminded she
had taken an in service in [DATE] about using the kiosk and consulting with the plan of care/ resident
provide regarding resident care needs. She said she did receive the in service. She said she thought it was
okay to provide care to Resident #1 unassisted because she had seen other staff do so. She said she did
not review his resident profile during the time she worked at the facility for about 6 months.
During an interview on [DATE] at 1:50 p.m., the DON said Resident # 1 was a 2 person assist with ADL
care. She said it clearly stated in his plan of care documentation and everywhere. She said Resident #1 did
not have ability to grip and hold onto the bars on the side of the bed. The DON said she was confused by
CNA A's behaviors that day, she was supposed to have gotten off work at 7:00 p.m., she said the other
aides on hall thought she had already left for the day. She said she was in Resident #1's room around 7:30
p.m. providing care to him. The DON said the fall caused Resident to break both femurs. The DON said
when the aide was providing care to him, she had the bed in the highest position when she rolled him. She
said according to the aide and the resident interviews his feet fell off the side of the bed and his legs
followed. She said CNA was terminated- and did not work again. He went over the side of the bed, so his
legs hit first. She had worked at the facility for about 6 months, and didn't know if she worked that hall.
Record review of CNA A's personnel file indicated a hire date of [DATE] and a CNA Competency check list
which indicated competency on Resident Profile and care delivery.
Record review of an in service, dated [DATE], on transfers indicated to check the profile of each resident
prior to transfers to prevent injuries. Ask for help if a resident seems more confused than usual. Use a
Hoyer for residents that list it on the profile under ADLS. The in service also included instructions for the
Kiosk, instructions on selecting the resident profile for the most recent accurate care plan. CNA A signed
the in service which indicated she had attended.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of CNA A's Suspension Pending Investigation form, dated [DATE], indicated the employee
was changing Resident #1, and he fell out the bed which resulted in him going to the ER. The Employee
said it was an accident, she did not mean for the resident to get hurt. The employee stated she injured
herself trying to catch the resident. The form indicated she was too upset to sign the form.
Record review of a Termination Form, with an effective date [DATE], indicated CNA A's last day to work was
[DATE]. She was terminated due to a violation of rules and policy.
Record review of the Mitigation Plan, dated [DATE], indicated the concern was a fall out of bed with major
injury. The incident was reported to HHSC, an investigation was initiated, and the staff member was
immediately suspended pending investigation, sent home and removed from the schedule on
[DATE].Residents who required assistance with bed mobility have the potential to be affected. The current
Residents were assessed by the DON/designated for appropriate amount of ADL assistance assigned to
each resident for bed mobility, toileting, and to validate amount of assistance displayed in the resident
profile. This was completed on [DATE]. Current residents with incident/accident reports for the past 14 days
were reviewed by the DON and or designated to determine the root cause analysis of the fall, and validate
that interventions were implemented as appropriate for root cause analysis. Daily review of
incident/accidents in the daily clinical meeting Monday through Friday will be completed by [DATE] and
ongoing Monday through Friday. Licensed nurses were re-educated on completing resident profiles upon
admission and updating with any changes so that the profiles remained accurate with needed information
to reflect the resident. The plan of care included the amount of assistance needed with ADLs and identified
resident risks. CNAs were re- educated on following the designated amount of ADL assistance care plan in
the resident profile. CNAs were educated on positioning with skills check off that was completed on [DATE].
Staff were educated on abuse, neglect, and exploitation completed on [DATE]. The facility administrator was
responsible for the overall implementation of validation of this plan and the facility director was informed of
this plan.
Record review of the facility Provider Investigation Report, dated [DATE], indicated the Provider Action
Taken Post-Investigation was conducted as needed QAPI with root cause analysis. A Mitigation plan was
initiated to include but not limited to identifying all residents who had the potential to be harmed by this
alleged deficient practice, residents were reassessed for accuracy. Licensed nurses were re-educated on
completing resident profiles on admission. CNAs were educated on following designated amount of
assistance and position with skills check offs completed.
Record review of the facility's mediation plan indicated they conducted an in-service on abuse neglect the
exportation on [DATE] for agency and facility staff.
Record review of an in-service, dated [DATE], indicated nurses were in-service on point of care profile for
residents. The in-service indicated to always use the care plan/resident profile to make determinations such
as the number of staff, the extent of moderate, or minimum needed to give care. It indicated to never use
less than what was listed in the plan of care. There were also directions on how to sign into the POC and it
gave pictures with an example of navigating the system.
Record review of the staff education/orientation on policies and procedures indicated the staff
demonstrated competency in moving positioning and assisting residents. It appeared that all aides had
competency check offs.
Record review of the facility's plan of care/resident profiles indicated all resident profiles were evaluated to
determine if they were correct.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:25 p.m., CNA E said she had been in serviced regarding using the
profile sheet, how to access it in the kiosk, and making sure to provide care according to the resident plan
of care. She said she provided care according to resident care plans/profile sheets.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:30 p.m., CNA/MA F said she did not provide resident care often, but she
was aware Resident #1 was a two person assist with care. She said she had completed an in service on
transferring and providing ADL care. She said they had a lot of agency staff who worked and had to have a
way of letting them know how to take care of the residents.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:33 p.m. LVN G said she had worked at the facility for 3 weeks. She knew
Resident #1 had broken his legs and was on hospice due to pain. She said Resident #1 received PRN
morphine every two hours and he also had Ativan for anxiety. She said when they provided care to
Resident #1 it was always two people and sometimes 3 people just to reposition him. She said she received
an in servicing on the resident profile and how to put the information in the system. She said the aides were
required to complete a return demonstration of how to access the information from the computer system
and there was a book on each hall with the profile information in it.
During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 5:38 a.m., RN H said she worked PRN and had been working at
the facility for 4 years. She said she was in serviced about Resident #1. She said she as a nurse, they were
educated on how to get on the plan of care in POC and how to put the information in the computer for the
Plan of care.
During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 5:41 a.m., RN I said she worked from 6p.m. to 6a.m. and had
worked at the facility for 12 years. She said she had worked with Resident #1 and his ability to hold on was
not dependable. She said Resident #1 could hold a little bit but did not have any grip strength. She said
Resident #1 was a Hoyer transfer, and two persons for changing. RN I said they did check offs on the
Kiosk, to make sure aides were able to access the level of care. She said nurses were educated on how put
information into the POC and how to put in updates.
During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 5:46 a.m., CNA J said she worked from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. and
had worked at the facility for 3 years. She said she worked all over the building. CNA J said Resident #1
had always been a two person assist. She said she had never gone in by herself to provide care to
Resident #1 without help. She said Resident #1 could grab the bar and hold at times. She said he was two
people go in because he is extensive assist with care. CNA J said she knew where the care plan/resident
profile was, and she knew how to go to the Kiosk. She said they had a lot of agency staff that worked at the
facility and she wanted to make agency staff were aware of how to provide the proper care to residents.
2. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness and lack of coordination.
Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], did not document a cognitive score on the
BIMS. The resident was dependent on staff for all ADLs and required supervision with eating.
Record review of Resident #2's computerized physician orders indicated to admit to hospice on [DATE]. An
order, dated [DATE], indicated to transfer with the assistance of two people with Hoyer lift. The order
indicated a diagnosis, dated [DATE], that indicated cognitive impairment moderate to severe. The order
indicated an added diagnosis on [DATE] of contractures to ankles and feet.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #2's Resident Profile sheet indicated her ADL status on [DATE] was one person
assist for bed mobility and two people assist with transfers via Hoyer lift.
Record review of Resident #2's x-ray report, dated [DATE], indicated an acute hip fracture.
Record review of Resident #2's nursing notes, dated [DATE] at 12:10 a.m., indicated Resident #2 had
increased swelling to the leg. The resident showed discomfort possibly related to pain. The resident was
unable to tell the nurse the area was hurting. Notified hospice awaiting call back. At 12:25 a.m. hospice
called and gave an order for an x-ray of the right leg and three views of the ankle at 12:09 p.m. X-ray results
showed right femur neck fracture. The family chose not to send the resident to the hospital and wanted the
resident to remain in the facility with pain control per hospice orders.
Record review of Resident #2's discharge summary indicated she expired on [DATE] while on hospice.
Record review of a Provider Investigation report indicated on [DATE] Resident #2 was noted with edema
that started in the lower right extremity and moved up the leg. The Hospice agency gave an order for an x
ray due to a possible fracture. The Resident was assessed and treated for pain. Staff were interviewed for
possible information related to the cause of the injury. Resident safe surveys were conducted on the hall
and no concerns were reported. The staff were [NAME]-serviced on care planned transfer techniques/gait
belt. Through the investigation process it was reported Resident #2 was transferred with a standing-pivot
transfer on [DATE]. There was no fall or adverse reaction at that time, the resident was transferred safely to
bed. The resident had a diagnosis of osteoporosis (decreased bone density, weakened and brittle bones)
and osteopenia (lower than normal bone density) which could have contributed to the femoral neck fracture
when she was transferred to bed. Resident #2 was care planned for a Hoyer transfer and while she could
stand and bear weight, this could potentially be the cause of the injury. The provider actions taken were the
DON/Designee would re-educate nursing staff regarding following the plan of care which included the
expectation that non-compliance would not be tolerated. This education was initiated on [DATE].
A list of statements provided by the Administrator on [DATE] at 3:10 p.m. was titled Confidential Attorney
Work Product. with no date. Statements indicated staff were interviewed regarding knowledge of an injury
to Resident #2 and no staff had any knowledge. During an interview with CNA C, she said 2-or-3 days prior
she had assisted Resident #2 with a stand and pivot transfer from her wheelchair to the bed. According to
CNA C, there were no issues noted during the transfer. CNA C said she did not know Resident #2 was a
two person assist. She said she asked CNA A and CNA A told her Resident #2 could bear weight. The
same form indicated CNA A said she told CNA C the resident could bear weight, but they used a Hoyer to
transfer her.
Record review of CNA C's personnel file indicated a hire date of [DATE]. There was a skills verification,
checklist and competency check offs that were completed by CNA C on [DATE]. The check off indicated
she was competent on physical and body mechanics, and the use of a transfer belt. She was also
competent on observation and documentation correctly on flow sheets in the kiosk as facility specific.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:09 p.m., the Administrator said CNA C had not worked with Resident #2
and she asked CNA A about the resident. CNA C said CNA A told her Resident # 2 could stand and pivot.
He said she apparently did not use the kiosk or profile sheet. He said they had a Mitigation binder for that
incident.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 9
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676300
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Canton Oaks
1901 S Trade Days Blvd
Canton, TX 75103
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
During an interview on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m., the DON said CNA C did an improper transfer and they
suspended her. She said they could not prove that was the reason why Resident #2 had the broken hip. The
DON said Resident #2 had not had any falls or events that could have caused the hip fracture. However,
they were going to allow CNA C to return to work with training. She had not come back to the facility.
During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 1:52 p.m., CNA A said CNA C asked her about Resident #2. She
said she thought CNA C had misunderstood what she had said. CNA A said she told CNA C, Resident #2
was a Hoyer lift transfer, but other staff transferred her by standing and pivoting. She said Resident #2 did
not show any pain after the transfer.
Record a review of a Mitigation plan, dated [DATE], indicated the facility received notice on [DATE] that
Resident #2 had a fracture of the femur. Residents were being treated by the facility per physicians orders.
Residents with a potential to be affected were residents who resided in the facility and required assistance
with mechanical lift. The director of nurses/designee educated nursing staff on following the plan of care,
which included the expectation that noncompliance was not tolerated. The education was initiated on
[DATE] and staff not completing by [DATE] would receive training prior to working next shift. The education
would be presented in the new hire packet on [DATE] all staff were in-service and reeducated regarding the
use of gate belts. Attached was a copy of an in-service on an abuse and neglect. Attached was a copy of
the facility's, gate belt procedures, and a copy of the facility's, geriatric patient assessment and treatment.
Record a review of the in-service that was attached to the mitigation plan indicated staff were in-serviced
beginning on [DATE] on transfers, to check the profile of each resident prior to transfers prevent injuries.
Ask for help if the resident seems more confused than usual and may need more help. They were to use a
Hoyer for residents that listed on their profile under ADLs. There were also instructions for the kiosk to
check the residents name and how to follow the instructions in the POC.
During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 5:38 a.m., RN H said she worked PRN and had been working at
the facility for 4 years. She said she was in serviced about Resident #2. She said she as a nurse was
educated on how to get on the plan of care in POC and how to put the information in the computer for the
Plan of care.
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:41 a.m., RN I said she worked from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. and had worked at
the facility for 12 years. She said Resident #2 was a two person assist and her weight bearing was not
reliable. She sa[TRUNCATED]
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676300
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 9