Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West SCMS #6763122 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0576 Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the residents' right to receive mail, for all facility residents, in that: Residents Affected - Many Facility staff did not distribute mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: During a confidential group meeting on 10/30/24 at 2:30 p.m., members of the resident group stated that they do not receive mail on Saturdays and stated they feel this practice was disrespectful. During an interview with the ADON on 10/31/2024 at 9:30 a.m., the ADON stated mail was not delivered to resident's on Saturdays, unless they came up to the receptionist and asked for their mail. During an interview with the ABOM on 10/31/2024 at 1:18 p.m., the ABOM stated he and the BOM did not work on Saturdays, and that the mail received at the facility on Saturdays were left for them to sort and was given to the residents on Mondays, unless the residents asked for their mail. During an interview with the Weekend Receptionist on 10/31/2024 at 1:22 p.m., the Weekend Receptionist stated she received the mail from the postman/woman on Saturdays and was instructed to leave all of it, including the residents mail, for the ABOM and the BOM to sort and distribute on Mondays, unless a specific resident came and requested their mail. During an interview with the DON on 10/31/2024 at 1:34 p.m., the DON stated that residents should receive their mail on Saturdays. Record review of the facility policy, Resident Mail Delivery, undated, revealed Business office will receive residents mail and will hand deliver it to resident's rooms day of delivery or next business day. . Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676312 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676312 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/31/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West S 222 Bertetti Dr San Antonio, TX 78227 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0657 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation's, interview's, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise Resident Care Plans after each assessment for 1 of 12 Residents (Resident #28) whose records were reviewed for care plan revision/timing: The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's care plan was revised the reflect use of locked box. These deficient practices could affect any resident and contribute to Residents not receiving the care and services they needed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #'s 28 face sheet , dated 10/29/24 , a 65 - year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Heart Failure ( occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) , Type II Diabetes (condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel and Unspecified Dementia ( a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), Record review of Resident #28's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact. In an interview and Observation on 10/29/2024 at 10:35 a.m. Resident # 28 he stated that he is allowed to keep his money in his personal safe as he pointed to a locked box on his bed side table. In an interview on 10/29/2024 at 11:31 a.m. the MDS nurse she acknowledged she did not update Resident #28's care plan reflecting his use of a personal lock box as she was unaware that he was given a personal lock box. She added that the staff risked possibly not all being aware that Resident # 28 had a personal lock box by her not adding it to the care plan. In an interview on 10/29/2024 at 9:00 a.m. the DON said the MDS nurse should have updated Resident #28's care plan after quarterly MDS dated [DATE] because resident # 28 was provided a locked box prior to the quarterly MDS 9/4/24. She added the potential harm was staff might provide incorrect care to Resident #28. She stated her ADON was responsible for overseeing care plans and she audited them at random. Record review of the facility policy Care Planning, 5/2007 , revealed the interdisciplinary team shall develop a comprehensive person - centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676312 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0576GeneralS&S Fpotential for harm

    F576 - The resident has the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone,

    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.

  • 0657GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F657 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 31, 2024 survey of Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West S?

This was a inspection survey of Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West S on October 31, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West S on October 31, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.