F 0567
Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who have authorized the facility in writing
to manage any personal funds have access to those funds for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #4 and Resident
#5) reviewed for personal funds.
Residents Affected - Few
The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 and Resident #5 had access to their personal funds when
requested.
This failure could place residents whose funds are managed by the facility at risk of not receiving their
personal funds deposited with the facility and not having their rights and preferences honored.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 1/19/2024 revealed an admission date of 10/18/2022 with
diagnoses which included: schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness involving symptoms of
schizophrenia and characterized by symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations), hyperlipidemia (high
fat levels in the blood), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that develops with the way the body
regulates and uses sugar as fuel).
Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #4 had
a BIMS score of 15, which indicated her cognition was intact.
Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 1/19/2024 revealed an admission date of 8/24/2022 with
diagnoses which included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a type of progressive lung disease),
morbid (severe) obesity, and hyperlipidemia (high fat levels in the blood).
Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #5 had
a BIMS score of 15, which indicated her cognition was intact.
During an interview on 1/17/2024 at 3:30 p.m., the BOM revealed the facility only held up to $500.00 in
petty cash, which could be exhausted quickly due the demand by residents for withdrawals. The BOM
revealed the facility had recently completed a transition for the facility trust fund from one financial account
to another. The BOM revealed the new trust fund account was initially set up as deposit only, resulting in the
administrator becoming incapable of replenishing the petty cash account. The BOM stated that this error
occurred in December 2023. The BOM stated that the residents were notified of the banking error but did
not seem to comprehend.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 16
Event ID:
676331
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0567
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 1/19/2024 at 12:21 p.m., Resident #4 stated she had difficulties withdrawing money
from her account because when the administrator goes to the bank, all of the residents try to get money
and the amount of money in the petty cash account would be gone immediately.
During an interview on 1/19/2024 at 12:25 p.m., Resident #5 stated the facility does not carry enough
money to meet the resident's needs and they never know when the administrator was going to go to the
bank. Resident #5 revealed she was aware that part of the problems with accessing her money was due to
the facility having recently changed the bank account for the facility-managed trust fund.
During an interview on 1/19/2024 at 5:10 p.m., Resident #5 stated she was impacted by not having access
to her money by not being able to purchase personal items and snack items for her room.
During an interview on 1/19/2024 at 5:13 p.m., Resident #4 stated that due to her inability to go shop for
herself, she would typically ask friends visiting her to purchase items on her behalf. Resident #4 stated she
was unable to do that during the time the facility was having the banking error because she could not
reimburse her friends for the expense. Resident #4 revealed the banking error also impacted her ability to
give money to her boyfriend for his birthday.
Record review of the BOM's email to the facility corporate Cash/Treasury Team, dated 12/13/2023 revealed
I have tried twice now to have my ED go to [bank name] to cash petty cash checks printed from [account
name] for our resident petty cash. He has been denied because he is not an authorized signer and was
also told that our account was not set up for cashing, only for deposits. I need to know what we need to do
to get this fixed ASAP. Our residents are really upset that we are out of petty cash.
Record review of the BOM's email from the facility corporate Cash/Treasury Team, dated 12/22/2023
revealed The accounts 'deposit only' has been lifted so you should not have any more problems going
forward.
Record review of a facility report titled Check Listing Report, dated 1/17/2024 and noted for input date
range of 10/19/2023 to 1/17/2024. The following checks were noted under Description/Memo as Resident
Petty Cash or the Administrator's name, and noted as Void: 11/29/23, 12/04/23, two for 12/11/23, and three
for 12/12/23.
Record review of a facility policy titled Accounts Receivable Policy and Procedure Resident Trust Fund last
revised 3/1/2023 revealed: The Resident Trust Fund (RTF) policy and procedure establishes guidelines to
manage and monitor resident's funds in a uniform process that allows residents the appropriate access to
their funds while ensuring protection of resident funds in accordance with state and federal regulatory
requirements. The policy further stated, 1. Resident will have convenient access to their funds held in the
trust account and 2. The amount held in the Resident Trust Petty cash box at the facility will be sufficient to
meet the daily needs of the residents.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way
that maximizes each resident's well being.
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the specific
competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as described in the plan of care for 1 of
3 staff (RN A) reviewed for nursing competencies, in that:
The facility failed to assess medication competencies for RN A prior to 1/06/2024 when RN A failed to
follow physician orders for holding insulin glargine for a blood sugar less than 100.
This failure could place residents at risk for not having medications accurately dispensed, not receiving the
intended therapeutic effects of their medications and could contribute to possible adverse reactions.
The findings included:
Record review of RN A's Nursing Competency Skills Checklist dated 2/11/2023 and signed off by the DON
revealed RN A was marked as competent to perform testing blood glucose, patient assessment,
administering subcutaneous injections. Medication administration was not part of the competencies
assessed.
Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/11/2024 revealed an admission date of 12/27/2023 with
diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose levels),
acute kidney failure and hypertension (high blood pressure). The face sheet indicated Resident #1 was
discharged on 1/06/2024 to a local hospital.
Record review of Resident #1's baseline care plan dated 1/02/2024 revealed the resident had diabetes
mellitus with goals to be free from signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels that fall
below normal) and would not have a re-hospitalization within 30 days with no medication or insulin
interventions.
Record review of Resident #1's medical record for a comprehensive MDS assessment revealed it had not
been completed due to new admission status.
Record review of Resident #1's insulin glargine orders dated 12/28/2023 revealed an order for insulin
glargine subcutaneous (injection under the skin) solution 100 u/ml, inject 25 units subcutaneously two times
a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hold if blood sugar less than 100.
Record review of Resident #1's January 2024 MAR revealed orders for insulin glargine 100 u/ml, inject 20
units subcutaneously two times a day related to diabetes mellitus, hold if blood sugar less than 100. On
-1/06/2024, Resident #1 had a documented BS of 77, insulin was documented as given (instead of held) by
RN A.
Record review of Resident #1's SBAR documentation dated 1/06/2024 at 10:00 a.m. by the RN Weekend
Supervisor revealed Resident #1 had a change of condition of decrease in level of consciousness and was
unresponsive.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 10:08 a.m., RN A stated she confused two of Resident #1's orders and
gave insulin glargine when Resident #1 had a blood sugar of 77 and did not hold the medication. RN A
stated she realized her mistake after Resident #1 was found unresponsive with a blood sugar level that
read low. RN A stated low meant the machine could not register a number and the number was lower than
the machine could read. RN A stated Resident #1 was taken to the hospital with a low blood glucose
reading and unresponsiveness by EMS after the facility called 911.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 12:15 p.m., the DON stated RN A had a medication error with Resident
#1's insulin. The DON stated she had a completed a 1:1 training with RN A over the phone and initiated
competencies reviews for licensed staff. She stated on 1/06/2024 RN A had completed an in-service
training and insulin administration/glucose monitoring skills check off.
During an interview on 1/18/2024 at 3:51 p.m., the DON stated the skills competency check off list did not
include a medication competency. The DON stated these skill competencies were given during the hiring
process for a new nurse and yearly. The DON stated the ADON's were assigned to complete the
medication competencies which were separate from the general competencies. The DON stated she was
unable to locate the medication competencies for RN A. The DON stated it was important to assess
medication competency skills to ensure the nurses have the correct skills for accuracy of administration and
to understand the concepts of medication administration.
During an interview on 1/18/2024 at 1/18/2024 at 4:48 p.m., the DON stated after reviewing the facility
policy for competencies she knew in her mind the medication competencies were completed for RN A. The
DON stated she did not know what was done for competencies for RN A when she was hired because they
were unable to locate her hire competency skills and she was not the DON at the time. The DON stated she
had trusted both her ADONs to get the competencies done but they just had not been able to find the files.
The DON stated the pharmacist also came to the facility and completed random audits and watched
random nurses give medication pass. The DON stated she did not know if a pharmacist had observed RN A
because the pharmacist did not give her the records. The DON stated the pharmacist records were given to
ADON M who was terminated for an undisclosed reason.
During an interview on 1/18/2024 at 4:51 p.m., ADON L stated he assisted with nurse competencies upon
hire and yearly. He stated medication administration was part of the competency, but he had never
completed one. ADON L stated it was ADON M's responsibility to complete the medication administration
competencies. ADON L stated the medication competencies were kept in a binder, but they had been
unable to locate RN A's medication competencies.
During an interview on 1/19/2024 at 9:05 a.m., the HR Director stated ADON M was terminated for poor job
performance (date unknown).
Attempted interview on 1/19/2024 at 9:18 a.m. with ADON M (who had been terminated). Left a voicemail
and a text message. No call backs were received prior to exit.
Record review of a facility policy titled Nursing Staff Competency last revised 12/2023 revealed: Definition:
Competency (by CMS)- measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other
characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. B.
Competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs include but not limited to:
.medication administration .7. Each nursing staff member shall complete an annual competency
assessment and additional competency assessments as needed based on the resident population needs in
accordance with facility assessment . 10. Records of each staff development program shall be
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
maintained.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant
medication errors for 3 of 16 residents (Resident # 1, #2, and #3) reviewed for significant medication errors,
in that;
Residents Affected - Few
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 insulin glargine (a long-acting insulin used to treat high blood sugar
from diabetes) was held and not administered for a blood sugar level less than 100 per physician orders
which resulted in the resident becoming unresponsive and requiring hospitalization in the ICU.
This failure resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 1/12/2024 at 3:49 p.m. The IJ
template was provided to the facility on 1/12/24 at 3:59 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 1/13/24 the
facility remained out of compliance at a level of actual harm with a scope identified as isolated until
interventions were put in place to ensure staff members were in compliance with following physician orders
for insulin administration.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's medication; insulin glargine was held for a blood sugar level less
than 100 per physician order.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's medication; insulin glargine was held for a blood sugar level less
than 100 per physician order.
This failure could place residents at risk for a drop in blood sugar levels, a decline in health,
unresponsiveness, hospitalization and/or death.
The findings included:
Record review of Form 3613-a Provider Investigative Report dated 1/06/2024 revealed the DON
self-reported an allegation of neglect when Resident #1's family member alleged negligence after Resident
#1 was administered insulin glargine 20u (when her) blood sugar was 77. The report indicated insulin
glargine 20 u was administered when Resident #1's blood sugar was 77 with orders that stated not to
administer if less than 100. The resident was nonresponsive to verbal stimuli/sternal rub, but vital signs
were present. The resident was transferred to a local ER. The investigative findings were confirmed and the
document was signed by the DON on 1/12/2024.
Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/11/2024 revealed an admission date of 12/27/2023 with
diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (blood sugar levels that are elevated
and above normal), acute kidney failure and hypertension (high blood pressure). The face sheet indicated
Resident #1 was discharged on 1/06/2024 to a local hospital.
Record review of Resident #1's baseline care plan dated 1/02/2024 revealed the resident had diabetes
mellitus with goals to be free from signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (blood sugar levels that are below
normal) and would not have a re-hospitalization within 30 days with no medication or insulin interventions.
Record review of Resident #1's medical record for a comprehensive MDS assessment revealed it had not
been completed due to new admission status.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Record review of Resident #1's insulin glargine orders dated 12/28/2023 revealed an order for insulin
glargine subcutaneous (injection under the skin) solution 100 u/ml, inject 25 units subcutaneously two times
a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hold if blood sugar less than 100.
Record review of Resident #1's January 2024 MAR revealed orders for insulin glargine 100 u/ml, inject 20
units subcutaneously two times a day related to diabetes mellitus, hold if blood sugar less than 100. On
Residents Affected - Few
-1/06/2024, Resident #1 had a documented BS of 77, insulin was documented as given (instead of held) by
RN A.
Record review of Resident #1's SBAR documentation dated 1/06/2024 at 10:00 a.m. by the RN Weekend
Supervisor revealed Resident #1, who was full code status, had a change of condition of decrease in level
of consciousness and was unresponsive.
Record review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 1/06/2024 at 12:45 p.m., as documented by RN A
revealed:
.0700 (7:00 a.m.) I started my morning accuchecks (blood glucose monitoring). Resident (#1) was awake,
alert. I asked resident how she was and she stated she was doing fine. I checked her blood sugar, and it
was 77. At that time, I administered 20 units of Lantus (insulin glargine) as per MD orders. I mistakenly saw
parameters to hold insulin if BS < 70 when the actual order said to hold if BS was < 100 .At 0900 (9:00
a.m. I went to resident's room to check her incision sight (sic) .at this time I noted resident (Resident #1)
was nonresponsive to verbal (communication/stimulation) or sternal rub. I immediately checked her vitals
.blood sugar machine read lo (sic). At 0910 (9:10 am), I gave resident (Resident #1) glucose oral gel as per
MD orders. I stayed with resident and had another nurse call 911. EMS called at 0920 (9:20 a.m.). EMS
arrived at 0925 (9:25 a.m.) and transported (Resident #1) to (local hospital) at 0930 (9:30 a.m.). At 0945
(9:45 a.m.), I called the hospital and gave report (to a hospital staff member) and informed her at that time
that I had mistakenly given her 20 units of Lantus (insulin glargine). At 1130 (11:30 a.m.), I called to check
on Resident #1 and was told she was intubated (required a tube in her airway and mechanical ventilation)
but stable and her sugars were up and down .I notified NP C of transfer and medication error, DON and
family member .
Record review of Resident #1's hospital records dated 1/06/2024 revealed Resident #1 was brought to the
emergency department with altered mental status by EMS, after she found unresponsive at the nursing
home facility and was given glycogen (medication used to raise blood sugar levels) (at the nursing home).
The resident was hypotensive 80/45 (low blood pressure) and hypoglycemic (low blood glucose). EMS
checked her blood glucose, and it was also low. She was given D10 (water with 10% sugar via IV) by the
paramedic staff and in route her blood sugar improved to 300, however the patient's mental status did not
improve. Medical Decision Making: This patient arrived completely unresponsive. Even correcting her
glucose with D50 (50% glucose solution via IV), she remained unresponsive. We made the pretty rapid
decision to intubate her in order to protect her airway. Normal CT findings (of her brain). Her blood sugar
continued to drop despite 2 A (2 doses) of D 50. I think her mental status is due to the hypoglycemia. At this
point we will need to admit her to the ICU for further ventilator management. She does not appear to have
acute sepsis and her white blood cell count is normal. I am not going to start her on any antibiotics at this
point .Her procalcitonin was within normal limits (high levels of procalcitonin indicate sepsis or bacterial
infection). Impression/Plan: 1.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Altered mental status 2. Acute respiratory failure 3. Acute metabolic encephalopathy due to hypoglycemia
(alteration in level of consciousness and global brain function as a result of acute metabolic functions) 4.
Acute hypokalemia (low potassium levels) (a documented side effect of insulin administration in medical
literature).
Record review Resident #1's medication administration time audit for 1/06/2024 revealed insulin glargine
100 u/ml was documented as given on 1/06/2024 at 7:02 a.m. by RN A, which was slightly more than 2
hours before Resident #1 was found unresponsive.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 8:30 a.m., Resident #1's family member stated Resident #1 was in a
local hospital ICU. She stated Resident #1 was found unresponsive and the nursing facility told her they
found Resident #1 with a blood sugar of 75. The family member stated 75 was low for Resident #1. The
family member stated the nurses should have treated Resident #1 with a sugar pill and they should have
made sure she ate and retook her blood sugar level to ensure it improved. She stated she did not
understand what happened and had questions that were unanswered. The family member stated Resident
#1 was treated at the hospital for low blood sugar, e-coli infection, and flu.
During an observation/interview on 1/12/2024 at 8:55 a.m., Resident #1 was observed seated in a chair
beside a hospital bed in the ICU. She was alert, oriented x 4 (cognitively intact) and talkative. Resident #1
stated she had a history of low blood sugar levels that had previously led to hospitalization. She stated she
could feel when her blood sugar was low and would take a glucose tablet. Resident #1 stated she had not
been feeling ill prior to this current hospitalization. She stated she had a runny nose a few days before but
was already recovering and had never felt bad. Resident #1 stated on 1/06/2024 she does not remember
the day at all. She stated she had no memory of the evening before either. She stated she woke up in the
hospital with a sore throat and was told by the hospital she was found unresponsive with a low blood sugar
and had to have a tube in her throat. Resident #1 stated the nursing home told her family member they
made a medication error, but she had not spoken to anyone from the nursing home facility. Resident #1
stated she was hopeful to be discharged from the hospital soon but did not want to return to the nursing
home.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 9:17 a.m., an RN from the local hospital ICU stated Resident #1's
diagnosis was hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). She stated Resident #1 had been intubated and, in the
ICU, but was now downgraded, was no longer ICU status and was waiting transfer to a regular hospital
room. The RN stated Resident #1 came to the hospital with extremely low blood sugar and altered mental
status that required intubation. The RN stated during the course of her hospital stay she was also
diagnosed with a UTI and the flu.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 10:08 a.m., RN A stated she was not familiar with Resident #1
because she only worked on the weekends. She stated she had a routine that she completed when she
worked. She stated at 6:15 a.m. she checked on Resident #1 at the start of her shift and noted the resident
opened her eyes. RN A stated Resident #1 was her first accucheck (blood glucose monitoring) of the day.
RN A stated on the MAR she saw a blood glucose monitor order and a Lantus (insulin glargine) order. She
stated she thought the blood glucose monitoring order which had a hold if less than 70 order in it meant to
hold Lantus (insulin glargine) if less than 70. RN A stated Resident #1's BS was 77 so she gave the insulin
and did not hold the medication. RN A stated she confused the two orders. She stated Resident #1 was a
little bit awake at 7:00 a.m. when she administered insulin glargine. RN A stated she knew Resident #1 was
a little bit awake because she held her finger out and showed her (RN A) what site she wanted her to use
before falling back to sleep. RN A stated she went back into the room at 8:30 a.m. and Resident #1 was
asleep but woke up. RN A stated a little after 9:00
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
a.m. she went into Resident #1's room to check on her surgical incision and found the resident
unresponsive. RN A stated she took Resident #1's vitals, which were normal and took a BS reading. RN A
stated the BS reading said low. She stated low meant the machine could not register a number and the
number was lower than the machine was able to read. RN A stated she gave Resident #1 glucagon gel in
her mouth, but because she was unresponsive, she was unable to keep the gel in her mouth. RN A stated
she knew she needed to get Resident #1 some sugar, so she gave the resident a glucagon injection in her
left arm. RN A stated she asked LVN K to call 911. RN A stated EMS arrived shortly after, and they also
checked Resident #1's blood sugar and also got a low reading. She stated EMS took Resident #1 from the
facility immediately. RN A stated she determined unresponsiveness because Resident #1 had a different
look, she did not open her eyes, did not respond to her name or to touch and when she did a sternal rub
there was no response. RN A stated Resident #1's breathing was fine, in fact Resident #1 was snoring a
little but otherwise had normal respiration and she had no change in her temperature or other vitals. RN A
stated Resident #1 had not complained of feeling ill and other staff had told her it was normal for Resident
#1 to sleep in a little. RN A stated at 7:30 a.m. she had put Resident #1's breakfast tray in the room but
never checked to see if the resident had eaten. RN A stated she assumed she had eaten. RN A stated she
realized she made a medication error when Resident #1's BS read low. RN A stated she went and looked at
her actual chart, re-read the order and saw her mistake. RN A stated she then notified the DON and told
her she read the order wrong. RN A stated the DON then told her she needed to document what happened
in Resident #1's medical record, call the hospital, and tell them what she did. RN A stated she did call the
hospital and then Resident #1's NP C. RN A stated NP C stated okay 77 is low, but it is long-acting, not
sure why it would drop the sugar so fast: RN A stated she then notified Resident #1's family member. She
stated she told the family member she found the resident unresponsive and sent her out (to the hospital).
RN A stated the family member came to the facility upset and said she (RN A) was neglectful. RN A stated
the Weekend Supervisor had her read the policy on insulin education and read parameters and they had
her sign the document. RN A stated she had not yet been called in for her 1:1 education although she had
been told it would be done. RN A stated she had training on the 5 Rights of Medication Administration
which included the right dose, right patient, right timing and she could not remember the last right. She
stated she was trained to read all information on the MAR. She stated the MAR for Resident #1 had more
information, but she did not click on it. She stated she should have clicked on it and she should have read
the parameters. RN A stated she had never seen parameters in Lantus (insulin glargine) before. She stated
since Lantus was a long-acting medicine it was give it and done (meaning she gave the medication without
the need for further action). She stated with a short acting insulin she had to make sure the resident ate.
RN A stated every facility has their own parameters for low sugar levels. She stated typically normal was
70-110. She stated 70 or lower would be considered critical low. RN A stated she was not concerned about
a BS of 77 because she knew Resident #1 was going to eat. RN A stated her mistake was not reading the
whole order and confusing two orders.
During an observation/interview on 1/12/2024 at 11:50 a.m., LVN N demonstrated on the nurses
computerized medical record and medication administration records on the computer how an order for
insulin glargine appeared. LVN N clicked on a resident name for medication administration which pulled up
the medication insulin glargine. LVN N hovered her curser over the medication name and a short but
incomplete order was visible (snip-it of information). Once she clicked on the medication insulin glargine a
new screen popped up with the home page which indicated the entire physician order including parameters
for holding the medication for blood sugar less than 100. LVN N was then able to navigate from the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
physician order page to additional tabs that allowed her to document administration. LVN N stated there
were several screens to choose from when administering insulin glargine after clicking on the medication
name. She stated the first screen that auto populated was the physician order screen with dosage
instructions and parameters. She stated she could then click on an additional screen to document actual
administration. She stated the snip-it of information might not be complete but once the button was actually
pushed the entire order with parameters was visible. LVN N stated she had taken care of Resident #1 in the
past (date unknown) and had held insulin glargine for a blood sugar less than 100. LVN N stated to her the
order was not confusing.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 12:15 p.m., the DON stated RN A had a medication error with Resident
#1's insulin. The DON stated as a result of the medication error involving Resident #1, the facility had
completed an incident report, conducted an audit on insulin to ensure each resident had the right orders
and parameters, completed a 1:1 training over the phone with RN A and initiated competencies reviews for
licensed staff. The DON stated an in-service training for licensed staff and medication aides had been
started on 1/06/2024. The DON said 11 of 42 staff had not completed the in-service training and only 14 of
32 licensed staff had completed skills competencies check offs.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 2:33 p.m., the DON stated her expectations for medication
administration were for staff to follow physician orders, to hold the medication if it was below physician
prescribed parameters and to notify the physician of a change of condition.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 3:49 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility had documentation that
the medication error made by RN A was not the facility's fault from the NP (unknown name). The
Administrator stated he was unable to locate the document and asked the DON to give the surveyor the
document. The DON responded by saying there was no document, only a text conversation between herself
and the NP (unknown name). A copy of the text communication was requested but was not received prior to
exit.
During an interview on 1/12/2024 at 4:10 p.m., the Medical Director stated she was not Resident #1's
physician. She stated she had not reviewed Resident #1's medical record and did not have full access to
the records. She stated she was told Resident #1's diagnosis at the hospital was metabolic encephalopathy
without hypoglycemia by staff (unknown names). The Medical Director stated she thought the findings
would be that Resident #1 was septic and her blood sugar was fluctuating from sepsis. The Medical
Director, when replying to a question about what staff should do in response to resident illness and
fluctuating blood sugars stated staff should call (the physician) to clarify an order if it was below
parameters. The Medical Director stated, obviously there was a medication error but the nurse went to
monitor the resident as she should have and sent the resident out (to the hospital) as she should have. The
Medical Director stated the insulin was long acting and should not have bottomed her (Resident #1) out
(caused a rapid decrease in blood sugar) like a short acting . The Medical Director stated she was told
there was only a 1-hour window from the time the insulin was administered and her hypoglycemic event.
The Medical Director stated she felt like the nurse did what she was supposed to do by getting the resident
to the hospital.
During an interview on 1/13/2024 at 3:10 p.m., the Weekend Supervisor stated on 1/06/2024, LVN L came
and got her for an emergency and stated RN A needed her. The Weekend Supervisor stated she went to
Resident #1's room and found the resident unresponsive. She stated they had already tried a sternal rub to
wake her up and had tried to raise her blood sugar. The Weekend Supervisor stated they retook Resident
#1's BS and it read low, so they called 911. The Weekend Supervisor stated EMS arrived and also took a
BS reading but she was not able to see what it read. She stated low meant the blood
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
sugar was too low for the machine to pick up a number. The Weekend Supervisor stated right after
Resident #1 left for the hospital, RN A came up to her and said she thought she made a mistake by giving
insulin when she was not supposed to. The Weekend Supervisor stated RN A stated she read the order
wrong. The Weekend Supervisor stated they completed a risk management/medication error/incident report
and RN A called the hospital and informed them she gave the insulin. The Weekend Supervisor stated RN
A also notified the RP for Resident #1 and was given a 1:1 in-service by the DON. The Weekend
Supervisor stated the DON told her she was to complete blood sugars and insulin for RN A for the rest of
the weekend and was told RN A could not give any insulins. The Weekend Supervisor stated RN A was
compliant and she (the Weekend Supervisor) completed insulin administration on RN A's residents over the
weekend. She stated she did review Resident #1's medical record after the incident and agreed there was a
medication error. The Weekend Supervisor stated her job duties did not included auditing or monitoring
medical records for accuracy of medication administration. She stated she did not follow up on medication
orders because it was not part of her job duties.
During an interview on 1/13/2024 at 5:12 p.m., the ADON stated his job duties included medication and
medical record audits. He stated he reviews new admissions and ensures medication parameters are in
place. He stated he was supposed to review insulin administration by auditing records daily by order listing
and review medications. He stated he looked to ensure all residents got all medications. He stated he had
not noticed any medication errors prior to the incident with Resident #1 on 1/06/2024. He stated he was not
in the facility on that day and had no knowledge of the event. He stated education including medication
rights and the right to refuse medications was important to prevent medication errors. He stated he also
gave in-service training to staff as part of his job duties but had not given any in-services on medication
until 1/06/2024. He stated he reports his finding daily to the DON.
During an interview on 1/13/2024 at 6:07 p.m., the DON stated during morning meetings she and the
ADON were responsible for running e-mar (electronic medication administration record) reports and
reviewing for medication accuracy. The DON stated the ADON should have been reviewing that insulin
parameters were followed. The DON stated RN A should have followed Resident #1's physician orders for
insulin parameters. The DON stated if the medication was not held when the BS was less than parameters,
the RN should notify the physician and the documentation should have clear indicators on why the
medication was not held based on the physician order. The DON stated the nurse who administered the
medication was responsible for the accuracy of medication administration. The DON stated the ADON and
DON were responsible for supervising the nurses. The DON stated when she reviewed reports for
medication administration, she was checking for daily medication administration and ensuring new orders
were inputted correctly into the computer. The DON stated she thought the medication error occurred
because of education. She stated RN A was and old school nurse who was taught that insulin was not held
unless blood sugar was less than 70. The DON stated she did not believe RN A intentionally gave the
medication (incorrectly). The DON stated she thinks RN A became comfortable and the facility needs to
make sure they (nurses) review orders for changes. The DON stated accurate insulin administration was
important because the resident could have changes in blood glucose or have an underlying diagnosis
which could affect how the body handles insulin. She stated they could result in either hypoglycemia (low
blood glucose) or hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and could lead to unresponsiveness, becoming
comatose, and result in a change of condition and/or hospitalization.
During an interview on 1/13/2024 at 6:43 p.m., the Administrator stated the DON was responsible for
ensuring accuracy of medication administration and reports to him. He stated if the DON found a deficiency,
she should report to him so they could collaborate on the best course of action. The Administrator stated he
was
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
notified of the medication error late in the morning (1/06/2024) by the DON. He stated he collaborated with
the Corporate RN to get a second opinion to ensure they followed guidelines for reporting because
Resident #1 went to the hospital. The Administrator stated he ensured in-service training was started. He
stated he monitored staff by holding daily meetings with managers, reviewing 24-hour reports, making room
rounds and also attending in-depth clinical meetings. He stated they then take action if needed. He stated
they address each hallway as reported by the Charge Nurses and PCC documentation, The Administrator
stated he thought the medication error occurred because RN A was rushed. He stated he had not solidified
a root cause analysis of the event. He stated he thought she was probably rushing and did not take her
time. The Administrator stated there were two orders, both with holds for Resident #1 and he thought RN A
looked at one order and not the other. The Administrator stated he did not have a policy on management of
diabetes. He stated the facility followed physician orders.
Attempted interview on 1/12/2024 at 2:15 p.m. with NP C. Left a message with live physician answering
service requesting a call back from NP C and the on-call NP, NP J. On 1/12/2024 at 3:49 p.m., the
Administrator was informed of surveyor attempt to reach NP C and NP J. The Administrator stated he would
have the NP call this surveyor. No call backs were received.
Record review of a Counseling/Disciplinary Notice for RN A dated 1/06/2024 revealed RN A was given
counseling. Staff member (RN A) failed to correctly read and administer the insulin dosage according to the
physician order which resulted in change of condition. The facility corrective action was listed as, Failure to
follow the policies and procedures could result in further disciplinary action. The document was signed by
the DON on 1/06/2024. RN A wrote I take full responsibility for my mistake and have learned a very
valuable lesson for my mistake. RN A also signed the document on 1/06/2024.
Record review of RN A Nursing Competency Skills Checklist dated 2/11/2023 and signed off by the DON
revealed RN A was marked as competent to perform testing blood glucose, patient assessment,
administering subcutaneous injections. Medication administration was not part of the competencies
assessed.
Record review of a job description for Registered Nurse signed by RN A on 11/18/2022 listed her Essential
Job Functions/Drug Administration Functions as prepare and administer medications as ordered by the
physician.
Record review of a website describing diabetes and the effects of long-acting insulin (such as insulin
glargine) as it appeared on 1/19/2024
https://www.healthline.com/health/type-2diabetes/basal-insulin/how-long-for-insulin-to-work#insulin-types
revealed: Because every person is different, the way your body responds to insulin may not be the same as
someone else's. The type of insulin you take, and many factors can influence how rapidly insulin works in
your body and how long it stays. In general, long-acting insulin (insulin glargine) take effect within 2 hours,
has no peak level and lasts up to 24 hours. One possible side effect of long-acting insulin (insulin glargine)
is low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). Researchers have pointed out that the behavior of insulin after
administration may vary. Several factors can influence the absorption of insulin including site of
administration, concentration of insulin, frequency of injection site use, and physical factors such as
exercise .massaging the injection site .heat exposure.
Record review of a drug reference website as it appeared on 1/19/2024
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/insulin-glargine-side-effects.html revealed under the section titled For Healthcare
Professionals:
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Serious Side Effects: metabolic: very common (affecting 10% or more) hypoglycemia. Insulin glargine
should not be used if you are having an episode of hypoglycemia or low blood sugar.
Record review of insulin glargine side effects as it appeared on 1/19/2024
https://www.lantus.com/how-to-use/insulin-glargine-u100/?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Lantus+-+
revealed: The most common side effecting of insulin, including Lantus (brand name for insulin glargine) is
low blood sugar (hypoglycemia), which may be serious and life threatening. Other side effects may include
.low potassium levels (hypokalemia). Contraindications: Lantus (insulin glargine) is contraindicated during
episodes of hypoglycemia .Monitor blood glucose in all patients treated with insulin. Modify insulin regimen
only under medical supervision. As with all insulins, Lantus (insulin glargine) use can lead to life-threatening
hypokalemia.
Record review of a facility policy titled Care and Treatment-Insulin Administration undated revealed:
Procedures: 5. Verify medication/dose to order in computer.
Record review of a facility policy titled Medication Administration (undated) revealed: It is the policy of this
facility that medications shall be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. Procedures: 2.
Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician.
The Administrator was notified of an IJ on 1/12/2024 at 3:49 p.m. and was given a copy of the IJ Template
and a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested. The Plan of Removal was accepted on 1/12/2024 at 8:02
p.m. and included the following:
Immediate Action
1. Medical Director notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 1/12/2024 at 4:33 p.m.
2. Resident #1 no longer in the facility. Resident #1 was discharged to the hospital on 1/06/2024 at 9:30
p.m.
3. Pharmacist was notified on 1/12/2024 at 5:35 p.m. of medication error and facility receiving an IJ for
pharmaceutical services.
4. 100% Audit was completed on 1/06/2024 by DON for all residents who require insulin administration and
have parameters to ensure all parameters are being followed.
5. In-service began on 1/06/2024 for licensed nurses and CMA's. The importance of reporting medication
errors, possible adverse effects to medication errors, review of medication rights and overview of insulin
different types and outcomes by 1/12/2024.
Abuse and Neglect in-service was started on 1/12/2024 and will be completed by 8:00 am on 1/13/2024.
Any employee not in facility will receive in-service via phone, any employee who had not received in-service
will not be allowed to work until in-service had been received.
6. A 1:1 in-service was conducted with nurse who administered insulin on 1/06/2024.
7. Insulin administration skill check off for all nurses was started on 1/07/2024 and will be
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
completed at 100% by 8:00 a.m. on 1/13/2024. Any employee who had not been checked off will not be
allowed to work. A log will be created for employees who have not received competencies or in-service and
will be highlighted. Once received a copy of this log will also be given to the staffing coordinator to ensure
no one is placed on schedule prior to training starting 1/12/2024.
8. An off cycle QAPI (meeting) was conducted on 1/12/2024 with the Medical Director, IDT team, clinical
resource to review the IJ POR.
Identification of others: All residents who have insulin orders with parameters have the potential to be
affected by this alleged deficient practice.
Systemic Change to prevent re-occurrence:
1. The clinical resource or DON/ADON will verify blood glucose level documentation daily to include the
weekend via remote for weekend monitoring to ensure glucose parameters are being followed. This will
start on 1/12/2024 at 8:00 pm. Daily review of all insulin parameters will be reviewed in the clinical meeting
by the DON/ADON/Administrator.
2. New Admissions with insulin orders with parameters will be reviewed by nurse managers to ensure
orders are being followed 1/12/2024.
Monitoring to ensure ongoing compliance:
1. DON will share summary of Plan of Removal activity with managers an[TRUNCATED]
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted
professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents
(Resident # 7) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that:
The facility failed to ensure RN A's signature matched her job title and nursing license.
This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place
improper identification of staff and role in the resident medical records.
The findings included:
Record review of the Texas Board of Nursing website at https://www.bon.texas.gov revealed:
RN A's nursing license for registered nurse (RN was current with an expiration date of [DATE].
RN A's nursing license for LVN/LPN was delinquent and had expired on [DATE].
Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of [DATE] with
diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (elevated blood glucose levels) ,
acute kidney failure and hypertension (high blood pressure). The face sheet indicated Resident #1 was
discharged on [DATE] to a local hospital.
Record review of Resident #1's electronic medical record progress notes including a resident change of
condition revealed multiple documentation entries on [DATE] that were electronically signed by RN A as
LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN is a title given to nurses in 48 of 50 states with the exception of
California and Texas which use the title LVN) instead of RN (registered nurse) to match her licensing title.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:07 p.m., the DON stated she was not aware RN A's signature on
Resident #1's medical record was signed as an LPN instead of RN. The DON stated as long as she had
known RN A, she had been a RN. The DON stated she was not certain but believed the HR Director was
responsible for changing the way the computer electronically assigned titles for documentation. The DON
stated it was important that the medical record reflected the nurse's accurate job title.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:10 p.m., RN A stated she originally began working in the nursing facility
as an LVN. She stated when she completed school and became a RN, she notified Human Resources and
gave them a copy of her new RN license. RN A stated she was unaware that her documents were signed
as LPN.
During an interview on [DATE] at 7:22 p.m., the HR Director stated the HR department was responsible for
changing status or titles in their records called Workday but did not know who was responsible for ensuring
those records were correct in PCC. The HR Director stated she did not have access to PCC, only a
program called Workday which synchronized data into PCC. The HR Director stated RN A's information in
Workday was listed correctly as RN. She stated she does not know why the information did not synch or
how to correct the issue. The HR Director stated no one had informed her (prior to
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 16
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676331
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/19/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Hunters Pond Rehabilitation and Healthcare
9903 Hunters Pond
San Antonio, TX 78224
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
surveyor intervention) that RN A's title in the medical records was inaccurate.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Record review of a facility policy titled Charting and Documentation (undated) revealed: The resident's
clinical record is a concise account of treatment care, response to care, signs, and symptoms and progress
of the resident's condition. The policy did not address how a staff were to sign the medical records.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676331
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 16