F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and accurately document medical
records on 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents housed in the secure unit of the facility.
The facility obtained a physician's order but failed to put the order in Resident #1's chart.
This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care that is substandard, unable to meet their needs,
and inaccurate medical records.
Findings Included:
Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/26/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was
admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included but are not limited to unspecified
dementia, major depressive disorder, blindness in left eye, and polyneuropathy (damage or disease
affecting peripheral nerves).
Record review of Resident #1's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS score of 05 indicating severe
cognitive impairment. Resident #1 MDS, section E-Behavior revealed no prior behaviors.
Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 9/13/23 with a revision on 10/23/23, revealed a focus of
resident resides in the Secure Care Unit, related to diagnosis of dementia and risk for elopement.
Interventions/Tasks indicated: Admit to Secure Care unit per MD orders.
Record review of Resident #1's physician orders, dated 10/11/23, revealed no physician order for admit into
the secure unit.
Record review of Resident #1's progress notes, dated 10/21/23, unknown author, that Resident #1 was
attempting to leave the facility. Per DON, the resident was to be moved to room [ROOM NUMBER].
Observation and interview on 10/26/23 at 10:56 AM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] was in the locked
unit on hall 2. Observed Resident #1 lying in bed with strong urine odor. Resident was unable to recall
incident. When asked if someone pinched another resident, Resident #1 stated, I would more than likely hit
them or slap them. I don't pinch. Observed Resident is oriented to person. Resident #1 did have an
instance of asking for surveyor's name again.
An interview on 10/26/23 at 2:39 PM with DON revealed the resident was an elopement risk and she had
attempted to elope two times. DON stated when the on-call provider was notified, the provider
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
676341
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676341
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/26/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Caprock Nursing & Rehabilitation
900 College Ave
Borger, TX 79007
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
indicated to put the resident on the locked unit and provided an order.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
An interview on 10/26/23 at 3:10 PM with ADON A revealed the procedure for being placed on the locked
unit was they must have an order by a physician. ADON A and ADON B attempted to locate order and an
order was not present in the resident's records.
Residents Affected - Few
An interview on 10/26/23 at 3:35 PM with ADM revealed residents must have a physician's order to be
admitted to the locked unit.
An interview on 10/26/23 at 4:01 PM with ADON B revealed a negative outcome for a resident not having
an orders would be the employee would need coaching for not placing the order in the resident's chart and
it does not provide the care they need.
Record review of policy SecureCare Environment admission Criteria and Process, revised February 1,
2007, states under Policy, Line 2- The need for admission to the SecureCare Environment must have a
physician's order.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676341
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2