Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Silver SpringCMS #6763762 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0583 Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for privacy. Residents Affected - Few The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's BIMS score and medical diagnosis was not given to non-family or non-medical persons in the building. These failures could allow residents' protected HIPAA information to be shared with individuals who do not have a need or right to know which could place residents at a risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 7/30/24, with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a neurological disorder that occurs when a chemical imbalance in the blood affects the brain), arthritis, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 8/21/24 reflected a BIMS score of 10 (moderate impairment). During a phone interview on 8/19/24 at 2:35 p.m., the ombudsman stated that she had a call from Resident #1's Family Member A who stated that someone at the building on 8/5/24 gave out Resident #1's BIMS and diagnosis to someone they should not have. She stated that there is an ongoing court case involving Resident #1 and Family Member B. She stated that a notary came to the facility and attempted to get Resident #1 to sign documentation to not evict Family Member B off the property back home. She stated that there was an argument, and some medical information was given out to the notary. She stated she followed up on the incident on 8/7/24 and went to the facility and asked who in the building gave away this information. She stated that the administrator stated, she was the one who gave out this information to the notary. She stated the administrator stated, she gave out the information to calm everyone down. During a phone interview on 8/19/24 at 2:55 p.m., Family Member A stated that on august 5th 2024 around 5:30 p.m., a notary came to the facility. She stated that the notary was trying to get Resident #1 to sign documentation which she should not sign. She stated that the next day august 6th 2024 there was a court case in which the notary at the facility shared Resident #1's diagnosis and BIMS score. She stated she has no idea who gave this information to the notary, and this should never have happened. She stated that was when she decided to reach out to the ombudsman to figure out who gave (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 676376 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676376 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/22/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Silver Spring 1690 N. Treadway Blvd. Abilene, TX 79601 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0583 this information away. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During an interview on 8/19/24 at 3:15 p.m., the Administrator stated that there was an incident on August 5th, 2024, in which a notary from the court was at the facility. She stated that Resident #1's Family Member A came and banged on her door and stated that the notary in the building should not be there and is not sure why he was there. She stated that there had been an ongoing court case, and this was roughly the 4th time the case was trying to be determined. She stated that in open conversation she stated to both the notary and Family Member A that they needed to know the residents BIMS score to determine if she had the ability to make the decision on her own. She stated that once she found out Resident #1's BIMS score she stated out loud to a group of employees and the notary. She stated she was trying to help the situation. Residents Affected - Few Record review of Facility Policy dated December 2006; titled Confidentiality of Information indicated: Policy statement-our facility shall treat all resident information confidentially. Policy interpretation and implementation: 1. The facility will safeguard all resident records, weather medical, financial, or social in nature, to protect the confidentiality of the information. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676376 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676376 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/22/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Silver Spring 1690 N. Treadway Blvd. Abilene, TX 79601 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 2 newly admitted residents (Residents #2) reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #2. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for decreased quality of life, improper care, and injury. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 8/20/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Record review of Resident #2's baseline care plan reviewed 8/20/24 revealed no data available. During an interview on 8/19/24 at 4:45 p.m., MDS C stated that Resident #2 came in on a Friday 6/28/24 and left AMA early Monday 7/1/24 morning. She stated that the nurses interim plan of care was completed upon admission for Resident #2. She stated but no baseline care plan was completed for the resident. She stated that the resident was not here long enough to get the care plan completed because it was through a weekend, and she left before they started on 7/1/24. She stated a baseline care plan should be completed on every resident within 48 hours. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 11:45 a.m., the administrator stated a baseline care plan should be completed within 48 hours of being admitted into the facility. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 12:25 p.m., the DON stated that a baseline care plan should be done within 48 hours of the resident being admitted . She stated that sometimes they use the interim plan of care to get an initial care plan done for a resident. She stated however, the interim plan of care documentation is incomplete and there is no baseline care plan completed Resident #2. She stated this was a miss by the staff, even if it was a weekend, it should have been completed and it was not. Record review of Facility Policy dated December 2016; titled Care Plans-Baseline indicated: Policy statement-A baseline pan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676376 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0583GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F583 - Privacy and Confidentiality

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • 0655GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F655 - Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 22, 2024 survey of Silver Spring?

This was a inspection survey of Silver Spring on August 22, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Silver Spring on August 22, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.