F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance
with accepted professional standards and practices, which were complete and accurately documented for 1
of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for documentation.
Resident #'1's electronic medical record did not contain complete and accurate documentation that CNA A
recorded the resident's toileting activity numerous days in the month of March 2024.
This failure could result in residents' records not accurately documenting interventions, monitoring, and
information provided to nursing staff and the RP and could lead to the assumption that residents do not
receive incontinent care and could develop skin issues and infections.
The findings were:
Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/28/24, revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE]
with diagnoses that included dementia, CVA (stroke), and major depressive disorder. Resident was a
female; age [AGE]. RP was listed as a family member.
Record review of Resident#1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed:
o
BIMS Score was 12 (6-12 indicated a moderate impairment).
o
ADLs : bowel and bladder incontinent of both. Transfer was listed as dependent and bed mobility was listed
dependent. ROM was documented as impairment to upper left arm (contracture).
o
Record review of Resident# 1's Care Plan, undated, revealed the goals and interventions for incontinent
care included: Check resident every two hours and assist with toileting as needed.
Record review of Resident #1's POC sheet for the month of March 2024 reflected no incontinent care
documented on the following days and shifts [6 A-2P, 2P-10P, and 10P-6A]:
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
676406
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676406
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Trucare Living Centers - Selma
16550 Retama Parkway
Selma, TX 78154
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
3/8/24-changed 3 times on the evening shift. No documentation for day or night shift.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
3/20/24 2P-10P
3/21/24 2P-10P
Residents Affected - Few
3/23/24 10P-6A
3/14/24 2P-10P
3/25/24 2P-10P
3/26/24 2P-10P
3/27/24 6A-2P
Record review of Resident #1's ADL sheet for the month of March 2024 revealed: incontinent care was not
documented by CNA A on the following days: 3/2 (6A-2P), 3/12 (2P-10P), 3/17 (2P-10P), 3/18 (2P-10P),
3/20 (2P-10P), 3/21 (2P-10P), 3/24 (2P-10P), 3/25 (2P-10P), and 3/27 (6A-2P).
Observation and interview on 3/28/23 at 2:15 PM, Resident #1 was in bed watching TV. There was no
incontinent odor in the room. The resident was cleaned and groomed and alert and oriented to person,
place, and time. There was a camera in the room and a W/C. The resident had a contracture to the left arm.
There were no injuries, skin tears, or bruises present. The call light was within reach, room was cleaned,
there were no fall hazards, and the room was homelike. The resident stated, .I am not wet or soiled .the
staff changes me every two hours . Resident #1 stated that there was usually a delay in staff answering the
call light to perform incontinent care.
Observation and interview on 4/3/24 at 2:40 PM, Resident #1 was in bed watching TV. The resident stated
that she was dry and had no issues with incontinent care on 4/3/24.
During an interview on 4/4/24 at 9 AM, the Administrator stated that CNA B was terminated on 4/3/24 for
failure to document the ADL sheet for March 2024 when providing incontinent care to Resident #1.
During a telephone interview on 4/4/24 at 9:45 AM, CNA B stated, she provided incontinent care to
Resident #1 and forgot to document it in the ADL sheet in March 2024 because she did not have a POC log
in. CNA B stated that she mentioned to LVN A the log-in issue but did not follow up. CNA B stated that she
was terminated for not showing up to work on time and not calling in to nurse management; and not
documenting ADLs which could give the impression that Resident #1 did not receive incontinent care
services.
During an interview on 4/3/24 at 4:45 PM, LVN A stated, there was documentation missing for the date
range 3/20/24 to 3/27/24 for Resident #1's toileting care. LVN A stated that best care practice was to check
every 2 hours to see whether incontinent care was required. LVN A stated there was no requirement to
change Resident #1's brief as long as it was dry. LVN A stated that there was no documentation in the POC
sheet and on certain days and she could not provide an explanation. LVN A stated that the responsibility to
check on incontinent care every shift was the responsibility of the charge nurse; and not checking could
lead to a false allegation that incontinent care was not done for
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676406
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676406
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Trucare Living Centers - Selma
16550 Retama Parkway
Selma, TX 78154
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Resident #1.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on 4/03/24 at 4:50 PM, the Corporate RN stated, documentation was lacking as
evidenced by blanks in the ADL sheet for March 2024 for Resident# 1. The Corporate Nurse stated the
responsibility to check on documentation lied with the charge nurses and the DON. The Corporate RN
stated the X marked on the ADL sheet meant the event did not occur and it was not known whether the
resident refused incontinent care, or the resident was dry; and lack of documentation could lead to a false
allegation that Resident #1 was not changed
Residents Affected - Few
During a telephone interview on 4/4/24 at 10:00 AM, the Medical Director stated, Resident #1 was resistant
to care and at times would refuse incontinent care which could lead to a UTI. The Medical Director stated
that he had no information that the resident was ever denied incontinent care or left in a soiled brief.
During a telephone interview on 4/4/24 at 10:24 AM, CNA C stated: she provided incontinent care to
Resident #1 and the resident triggered her call light every 10 minutes wanting to be changed. CNA C stated
the resident sometimes purposely soils the cleaned brief after being changed so as to be changed again
CNA C stated the resident has never been left in a soiled brief or denied water. CNA C stated there had
been no skin breakdown and the resident sometimes refused barrier cream. CNA C stated she
documented episodes of incontinent care or refusal in the ADL POC sheet. CNA C stated not documenting
could lead to a false allegation that Resident #1 was not receiving incontinent care.
Record review of facility's in-service conducted by LVN A on the topic of POC documentation revealed
(4/1-4/2/24) 16 CNAs signed the attendance sheet.
Record review of facility's in-service conducted by LVN A on the topic of POC documentation given to the
nursing staff other than CNAs revealed: 6 LVNs signatures (4/1-4/2/24) signed the attendance sheet.
Record review of facility's Charting and Documentation policy dated 3-1-2022 read: All services provided to
the resident .shall be documented in the resident's medical record .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676406
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3