Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Palomino PlaceCMS #6764221 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

676422 02/01/2025 Palomino Place 3160 Gus Thomasson Road Mesquite, TX 75150
F 0755 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure employees with access to controlled medication properly counted the inventory of the controlled medications. LVN A and LVN B did not adequately count the inventory on their medication cart, and it was later discovered that 120 tablets of Oxycodone (a controlled narcotic drug), belonging to Resident #1, was missing from the medication cart. The medications were never located. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 10/09/24 and ended on 10/11/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure placed residents at risk for unrelieved pain due to their medication not being readily available. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 10/09/24, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fats in the blood), muscle spasm of back (a sudden, involuntary contraction of the muscles in your back, causing a sharp, painful tightness or twinge, often triggered by overuse, injury, poor posture, or lifting heavy objects, and can feel like a sudden locking up of the back muscles, limiting movement), and pain (an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that signals potential or actual tissue damage). Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders, dated 02/01/25, reflected he was prescribed Oxycodone 15mg tablet orally every four hours as needed (for pain). The start date of this medication was 09/26/24. Review of the facility's Provider Investigation Report, dated 10/14/24, reflected on 10/09/24, Resident #1's prescription medication of Oxycodone 15mg was noted to be missing (120 tablets were identified as missing). Resident #1's medication was delivered on 10/03/24 (126 tablets), and he was given the medication on 10/05/24 (2 tablets), 10/06/24 (2 tablets), 10/07/24 (1 tablet), and 10/08/24 (1 tablet). The medications were counted on 10/08/24 at 10:00PM (at shift change), but neither nurse Page 1 of 3 676422 676422 02/01/2025 Palomino Place 3160 Gus Thomasson Road Mesquite, TX 75150
F 0755 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few who completed the medication count (LVN A and LVN B) could confirm if the blister packs (a form of tamper-evident packaging where an individual pushes individually sealed tablets through the foil in order to take the medication) of medication were there at the time of the count, nor could they remember the last time the medication was seen. It was noted that Resident #1 had not missed a dose of medication, as there was still a blister pack of Oxycodone (prescribed to him) on the medication cart that was being used. All appropriate parties, including the police department, were notified of the missing medication. LVN A and LVN B, who both denied diverting the medications, were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Staff statements revealed all individuals who had access to the medication denied taking the medication and/or knowing how the medication went missing. Drug testing revealed all individuals who had access to the medication tested negative for any substances, including Oxycodone. The facility was unable to determine who diverted the medication or how the medication went missing. To prevent further occurrences, the facility implemented a new form for shift count where nurses were required to count the blister packs as well as the individual sheets. There was also a new policy implemented in which the nurses were required to make a copy of all paperwork upon delivery of new narcotics and provide it to nurse management. The facility ordered new medication for Resident #1, at the cost of the facility. Facility staff were in-serviced on procedures for receiving narcotics, narcotic count protocol, the implementation of new narcotic count sheets with card counts, and controlled substance accountability. LVN A and LVN B both received a final warning/action plan due to their failure to ensure narcotics were accounted for during shift change. All staff were in-serviced on the facility's new policies and procedures. Review of the facility's in-service logs, dated from 10/09/24 to 10/11/24, reflected facility staff were in-serviced on procedures for receiving narcotics, narcotic count protocol, the implementation of new narcotic count sheets with card counts, and controlled substance accountability. Review of personnel files for LVN A and LVN B reflected they both received a written final warning/action plan, dated 10/09/24, for failing to count narcotics according to facility policy. Observations of five separate medication carts on 02/01/25 from 11:00AM to 12:00PM, including a review of narcotic logs and count sheets, reflected no evidence of a current drug diversion. It appeared as though facility staff were following the facility's policies and procedures to prevent a drug diversion. These observations were completed with CMA C, LVN D, LVN E, and LVN F. During interviews with multiple staff members (with CMA C, LVN D, LVN E, LVN F, and LVN G) on 02/01/25 from 11:00AM to 12:00PM, they each stated they had been in-serviced on pharmacy services. They were knowledgeable of the facility's policies and procedures related to acquiring, receiving, dispensing, labeling, storing, and administering medications. They were able to verbalize the facility's policies and procedures related to the prevention of drug diversion, including the new policies and procedures implemented as a result of the incident involving Resident #1's prescription medication of Oxycodone (such as what procedures to take when narcotics were received from the pharmacy as well as the procedure for counting medications). During interviews with the Administrator on 02/01/25 at 12:48PM and 3:20PM, he stated a drug diversion occurred with Resident #1's prescription medication of Oxycodone 15mg. The Administrator stated 120 tablets of this medication went missing from the medication cart. He stated a search of the facility, including all medication carts and the drug destruction area, revealed the medication was unable to be located. A review of the facility's staffing schedule, as well as Resident #1's MAR/TAR and narcotic logs, revealed the medication had to have gone missing on either 10/08/24 or 10/09/24. Potential perpetrators included LVN A and LVN B, as they were the last individuals to have access to 676422 Page 2 of 3 676422 02/01/2025 Palomino Place 3160 Gus Thomasson Road Mesquite, TX 75150
F 0755 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few and complete the narcotic count prior to the medication being identified as missing. However, both LVN A and LVN B were unable to recall if the blister packs of medication were on the cart during their narcotic count. The Administrator stated Resident #1 still had Oxycodone on the cart that was being given as prescribed, so he did not miss any scheduled doses or have any adverse effects. The police department was notified of the drug diversion. LVN A and LVN B were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Staff statements revealed all individuals who had access to the medication denied taking the medication and/or knowing how the medication went missing. Drug testing revealed all individuals who had access to the medication tested negative for any substances, including Oxycodone. The facility was unable to determine who diverted the medication. To prevent further occurrences, the facility implemented a new form for shift count where nurses were required to count the blister packs as well as the individual sheets. There was also a new policy implemented in which the nurses were required to make a copy of all paperwork upon delivery of new narcotics and provide it to nurse management. The facility ordered new medication for Resident #1, at the cost of the facility. Facility staff were in-serviced on procedures for receiving narcotics, narcotic count protocol, the implementation of new narcotic count sheets with card counts, and controlled substance accountability. LVN A and LVN B both received a final warning/action plan due to their failure to ensure narcotics were accounted for during shift change. The Administrator stated a potential risk of drug diversion was that the resident may not receive his or her prescribed dose of medication. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 02/01/25 at 1:17PM, she stated a confirmed drug diversion occurred with Resident #1's prescription medication of Oxycodone 15mg. The Director of Nursing stated as a result of the facility's investigation, new policies were implemented to include: a new form for shift count where nurses were required to count the blister packs as well as the individual sheets and a new policy implemented in which the nurses were required to make a copy of all paperwork upon delivery of new narcotics and provide it to nurse management. The Director of Nursing was monitoring this for timely and proper completion by staff to ensure the prevention of another drug diversion. The Director of Nursing stated a potential risk of drug diversion was that the resident may not receive his or her prescribed dose of medication. On 02/01/25 at 3:47PM, the surveyor attempted to contact LVN B via telephone. The surveyor left a voice message requesting a return telephone call. On 02/01/25 at 3:50PM, the surveyor attempted to contact LVN A via telephone. The surveyor left a voice message requesting a return telephone call. Review of the facility's Narcotic Receipt Procedures and Narcotic Count Protocol Policy, undated, reflected, .The new procedure for receiving Narcotic has become more defined. From this point forward, ALL narcotics forms (there are 3 in total) MUST be signed by 2 Nurses. Those 3 forms include: the delivery manifest, the Class II-V Delivery Record, and the Narcotic Count Sheet (maybe pink or white). Once you have made a copy of these three forms, they are to be stapled together and placed under the ADON's/DON's office door immediately. When counting the narcotics on the oncoming shift, you MUST give the name of the patient, the name of the medication, the strength of the medication, and the quantity of medication on hand. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROCESS. YOU WILL FOLLOW THIS PROTOCOL TO HELP PREVENT ANY MEDICATION FROM BEING MISPLACED OR TAKEN . 676422 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0755GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F755 - Pharmacy Services

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 1, 2025 survey of Palomino Place?

This was a inspection survey of Palomino Place on February 1, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Palomino Place on February 1, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharm..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.