Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BONNE VIECMS #6764441 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

676444 12/18/2024 Bonne Vie 8595 Medical Center Boulevard Port Arthur, TX 77640
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 3 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents #28, #42, & #87) The facility did not include interventions and goals for Resident #28's hospice care plan. The facility did not have a care plan to address Resident #42's use of Trazadone. The facility did not have a care plan to address that Resident #87 was PASRR positive and refusing services. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met and not receiving needed services. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 12/18/24 indicated Resident #28 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarct (stroke). Record review of the most recent quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 had a BIMS score of 14 indicating cognitively intact and indicated she received hospice care. Record review of physician''s orders dated 12/18/24 indicated Resident #28 was admitted to hospice services as of 08/23/24 for diagnoses of cerebral infarct. Record review of Resident #28''s care plans printed 12/18/24 indicated Resident #28 required hospice services but did not include any goals or interventions related to the hospice services. During an observation on 12/16/24 at 09:30 a.m., Resident #28 was lying in bed, she said she was treated well but was unsure if she received hospice services. 2. Record review of a face sheet dated 12/16/24 indicated Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included depression (a mental health condition that can affect how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). Record review of the most recent admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #42 had a Page 1 of 3 676444 676444 12/18/2024 Bonne Vie 8595 Medical Center Boulevard Port Arthur, TX 77640
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm BIMS score of 10 indicating moderately impaired of cognition with no mood symptoms in the last 14 days and no behavior symptoms in the last 7 days. Record review of physician''s orders dated 12/18/24 indicated Resident #42 was prescribed trazadone 50 mg at bedtime for depression with a start date of 11/19/24. Residents Affected - Some Record review of Resident #42''s December 2024 MAR indicated she received trazadone 50 mg daily at bedtime for depression with a start date of 11/19/24. Record review of Resident #42's care plans printed 12/17/24 did not indicate Resident #5 received the antidepressant medication trazadone. During an observation 12/17/24 at 09:54 a.m., Resident #42 was lying in bed, he said he was unsure of what medications he received. 3. Record review of a face sheet indicated Resident #87 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnosis included bipolar disorder (episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs) and major depressive disorder (a serious mental illness that affects how people feel, think, and act). Record review of a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level 1 Screening dated 3/5/24 indicated Resident #87 was PASRR positive due to a mental illness. Record review of an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #87 had a BIMS score of 13 indicating her cognition with intact and she was currently by state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness. Record review of a quarterly PASRR Comprehensive Service Plan (PCSP) dated 09/05/24 indicated Resident #87 was refusing PASRR services. Record review of a care plan last updated 09/20/24 indicated Resident #87 had no care plan identifying she was PASRR positive and was refusing PASRR services. During an interview on 12/17/24 at 9:57 a.m., Resident #87 said she felt well balanced and good at the facility. She said she was receiving psychiatric services. She said she didn't need other services and had refused services offered in the PASRR meetings. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:48 a.m., LVN C said she was providing care for Resident #28 and #42 on 12/18/24. She said Resident #28 received hospice services and should have been care planned for the hospice services with goals and interventions and was not. She said Resident #42 received trazadone daily and should have been care planned for trazadone and was not. LVN C said the Unit Managers were responsible for care plans. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:50 a.m., Unit Manager A said she was responsible for care planning Resident #28's hospice goals and interventions. She said the goals and interventions should have been care planned but were not. Unit Manager A said she was responsible for care planning Resident #42's trazadone. She said it should have been care planned but was not. She said they were overlooked. Unit Manager A said she was educated on care plans and was aware to care plan the hospice goals and interventions and the antidepressant medication. She said the resident risk of Resident #28 not 676444 Page 2 of 3 676444 12/18/2024 Bonne Vie 8595 Medical Center Boulevard Port Arthur, TX 77640
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some care planned for her goals and interventions for hospice and Resident #42's antidepressant medication was the nurses could be unaware of the care and services the resident's received. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 11:08 a.m., MDS Nurse D said she was responsible for writing PASRR care plans. She said Resident #87 qualified for PASRR services but was refusing the services. She said the resident should have a care plan to address that she was PASRR positive, refused PASRR services, and quarterly meetings were being held to offer services and document Resident #87's refusal. She said she just overlooked writing a PASRR care plan because the resident was not receiving PASRR services. She said she had received PASRR training through HHSC, her corporate office, and webinars. She said a possible negative outcome of not having a PASRR care plan was staff would not be aware Resident #87 was PASRR positive, refused services, and the quarterly meetings held. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 11:18 a.m., the DON said she and other nursing administration were responsible for overseeing care plans and nursing administration met quarterly to review care plans for accuracy. She said the nursing staff were educated on accuracy and completeness of care plans. She said the missed care plans were overlooked. The DON said the resident risk of missed care plans was the potential risk of the nurses being unaware of the resident plan of care. She said she expected all care plans to be updated and completed timely. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 11:22 a.m., the Administrator said nursing was responsible for completed care plans. He said the staff were educated on care planning. The Administrator said the resident risk of services or medication not care- planned was potentially the nurses may not know the plan of care. He said he expected all care plans to be completed timely and accurately. Record review of a facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022 indicated . The comprehensive person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and time frames; B. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain and maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being including: (1) services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment; (2) any specialized services to be provided as a result of PASRR recommendations; and (3) which professional services are responsible for each element of care; c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice and problem areas and conditions. 676444 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 18, 2024 survey of BONNE VIE?

This was a inspection survey of BONNE VIE on December 18, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BONNE VIE on December 18, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.