F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or
bed-hold policies.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative(s) of the
discharge, reasons for the move, and right to appeal in writing and in a language and manner they
understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care
Ombudsman for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for discharge planning.
1. The facility failed to notify Resident #1 and Resident #1's RP of Resident #1's discharge, reasons for the
move, and right to appeal in writing, in a language and manner they understand, and at least 30 days
before Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 06/11/25.
2. The facility failed to send a copy of the notice to the facility's Ombudsman before Resident #1 was
discharged from the facility on 06/11/25.
This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without alternative placement, discharge
options, their rights to appeal and access to advocacy services.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's Profile, dated 06/23/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year old female who was
admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 06/11/25.
Review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnoses Report, dated 06/23/25, reflected she had diagnoses of
hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the
body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left dominant side, dysphagia following cerebral
infarction (difficulty swallowing), age-related physical debility (a state of weakness and reduced physical
strength), generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, other lack of coordination, anxiety disorder,
anorexia (an eating disorder causing people to obsess about weight and what they eat) and depression.
Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she had a BIMS score of 6 out of 15,
which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 also always needed help with health literacy
(assistance with reading written material related to health) and was dependent on assistance with her
functional cognition (assistance with planning regular tasks).
Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, initiated on 03/03/25, reflected she wanted to establish goals for herself
and be involved in her discharge planning process. Staff were also required to communicate with Resident
#1 and/or her family related to progress, goals and plans, contact appropriate
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
676487
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676487
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Center at Parmer
13800 N Fm 620 Rd Sb
Austin, TX 78717
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
community agencies as needed when Resident #1 was ready to discharge, continue to encourage
Resident #1 to make an effort toward achieving their goals, and Resident #1 wanted to go home when she
discharged .
Review of Resident #1's Progress Notes, from 03/03/25 through 06/23/25, reflected there were no notes
related to a written notice of discharge and reasons for the move given to Resident #1, Resident #1's RP,
and the facility's Ombudsman.
Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Records on 06/23/25 reflected there was no written notice of
discharge and reasons for the move given to Resident #1, Resident #1's RP, and the facility's Ombudsman.
Review of Resident #1's IDT Discharge Summary, created by CM on 06/10/25 at 1:07 p.m., reflected she
was discharged on 06/11/25 at 12:00 p.m. with hospice, a wheelchair and a mechanical lift, would continue
physical therapy and medication management, and transported in a private vehicle to her home. The
section of the summary in which the discharge instructions were to be reviewed with Resident #1 or
Resident #1's RP in a language they understand was not signed and not dated by Resident #1, Resident
#1's RP, and CM or discharging nurse.
An attempt to contact the facility's Ombudsman was made on 06/23/25 at 9:50 a.m. The facility's
Ombudsman did not return the surveyor's attempted contact before exit.
During an interview on 06/23/25 at 9:54 a.m., Resident #1's RP stated the facility did not provide her and
Resident #1 with a written 30-day notice that they were discharging Resident #1 on 06/11/25. Resident #1's
RP stated she learned that Resident #1 was discharging from the facility by a medical equipment provider
who called her on 06/06/25. Resident #1's RP stated she called the CM on 06/06/25 and the CM told her
that Resident #1 was being discharged from the facility on 06/11/25 because she was coming up to her 100
days of covered stay at the facility. Resident #1's RP stated she informed the CM and ADM about her
concerns of not being notified of Resident #1's discharge in advance on unknown date . Resident #1's RP
also stated the facility did not inform her and Resident #1 of Resident #1's right to appeal the discharge and
the appeal process.
During an interview on 06/23/25 at 1:23 p.m., the ADON stated the CM was responsible for notifying
residents, residents' RPs and the Ombudsman in writing of residents' discharge from the facility. The ADON
stated she spoke with the facility's Corporate team and learned that the facility was required to send a
written discharge notice to residents, residents' RPs and the Ombudsman within 30 days of discharge per
the facility's policy. The ADON stated she did not know the facility was required to send a written 30-day
notice of discharge to residents, RPs and Ombudsman because the facility's policy was vague. The ADON
stated the facility did not comply with the regulation for providing a written 30-day notice of discharge to
residents, residents' RPs, and the Ombudsman.
During an interview on 06/23/25 at 1:56 p.m., Resident #1's RP stated Resident #1 was unable to answer
the surveyor's questions due to her severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1's RP also stated the
Administrator told her that she did not have to be informed of Resident #1's discharge three days before
Resident #1's discharge.
During an interview on 06/23/25 at 2:28 p.m., the CM said she was responsible for issuing a formal written
notice of discharge to residents, residents' RPs, and the Ombudsman. The CM stated she did not provide
Resident #1, Resident #1's RP, and the Ombudsman with a written notice of discharge
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676487
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676487
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Center at Parmer
13800 N Fm 620 Rd Sb
Austin, TX 78717
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
because she did not know she had to provide a formal written notice of discharge to the resident, residents'
RP, and Ombudsman within 30 days of a resident's discharge from the facility. The CM also stated she did
not inform Resident #1 and Resident #1's RP of Resident #1's right to appeal the discharge and the appeal
process for unknown reasons. The CM stated she knew it was important to provide a notice of discharge in
writing to the resident, representative and Ombudsman at least 30 days before a resident is discharged and
said, So residents' families knew when, where, why and how the resident was discharging from the facility.
So the Ombudsman was aware of the resident's discharge. The CM stated she knew it was important to
inform the resident and residents' RPs of residents' right to appeal their discharge and the appeal process
and said, Because residents must know their right to appeal. The CM stated the ADM was responsible for
overseeing and ensuring the discharge process was correctly completed. The CM stated the ADM was out
of the country at the time of the interview.
During an interview on 06/23/25 at 2:59 p.m., the DON stated Resident #1 had a low BIMS and could not
make decisions for herself. The DON stated the CM was responsible for initiating the notice of discharge to
the resident, resident's RP, and Ombudsman. The DON stated the CM did not provide a written notice of
discharge to Resident #1, Resident #1's RP, and the Ombudsman. The DON stated she knew it was
important to provide a written notice of discharge to residents, residents' RPs, and the Ombudsman within
30 days of a resident's discharge from the facility and said, You have to notify the appropriate parties to
ensure the resident discharge safely and to be able to follow-up with necessary agencies and make sure
resident was safe and provided continued care from the facility when transitioning back to home and so
family was equipped when receiving the resident. And so the Ombudsman could ensure and had a role in
resident being well taken care of and it was important for continuity of care for the resident and to make
sure to communicate all discharge plans and interventions the resident needed for the resident's welfare.
The DON stated the ADM was responsible for overseeing and ensuring the CM correctly completed the
discharge process.
Review of the facility's Transfers and Discharges policy, undated, reflected,
.Any transfer or discharge not meeting regulatory standards or that places the resident at risk is considered
inappropriate and is strictly prohibited .Discharges are inappropriate and unlawful if they occur under any of
the following conditions: .2. Failure to provide written notice: Not giving the required 30-day written notice to
the resident and their representative .Procedure for Transfer or discharge: .Notice Requirements: The facility
must provide 30 days written notice of discharge to the resident and their legal representative .Notice must
include: Reason for discharge, effective date, location to which the resident is being transferred, contact
information for: state long-term care ombudsman, state survey agency, appeal rights and process,
resources for assistance .5. Residents and their representatives must be informed of their right to appeal a
discharge .6. Involuntary Discharges: .The Ombudsman program must be notified before the discharge is
initiated .Staff Responsibilities: Admissions and Social Services: Ensure that transfers and discharges are
carried out in accordance with this policy, providing support and proper documentation .Administrator:
.inform the Ombudsman .
Review of the facility's Resident Rights policy, undated, reflected,
.Social Services: The Center must provide you with any needed medically-related social services, including
.discharge planning .You can't be sent to another nursing home or be made to leave The Center .You (and
your representative) have a right to be notified before you are transferred or discharged from The Center
.Your rights include: .The right to remain in the facility: The right to not be transferred or discharged .and to
be given 30 days advance notice .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676487
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3