F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive
person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights and describes the services
that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and
psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #39), reviewed for care plans.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's care plan was revised to reflect an order for an alarm guard.
This failure could place residents at risk of current needs not being met.
Findings include:
Record review of Resident #31's admission record, dated 05/31/2024, reflected the resident was an [AGE]
year-old female with an admission date of 04/11/23. Resident #31had diagnoses which included dementia
(general decline in cognitive activities), diabetes (sustained high blood sugar levels), cognitive
communication deficit (problems with communication), and anxiety disorder (mental disorder associated
with stress.)
Record review of Resident #31's significant change status MDS assessment, dated 05/24/24, reflected a
BIMS score of 3, which indicated Resident #31's cognition was severely impaired and had no behaviors of
wandering. Resident #31 used a wander/elopement alarm daily. Resident #31 used a wheelchair as a
mobility device. Resident #31 was transferred from the secured unit to the general population on 05/07/24.
Record review of Resident #31's physician orders reflected an order for an alarm guard, to the left arm,
start date 05/07/24. An order, dated 05/29/24, reflected an order for the alarm guard to the left ankle.
Record review of Resident #31's care plans reflected the resident required a wander guard (alarm guard)
bracelet and was at risk for injury from wandering in an unsafe environment, as evidenced by dementia and
Alzheimer's, date initiated on 05/29/24.
Observation on 05/29/24 at 11:00 AM revealed Resident #31 in bed, wearing an alarm guard on her left
ankle.
Interview on 05/31/24 at 2:42 PM with the DON revealed Resident #31 was in the secured unit and was
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
676493
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676493
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/31/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Sun Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
2902 S 77 Sunshine Strip
Harlingen, TX 78550
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
transferred into the general population because she became dependent on Hoyer lift transfers and could no
longer be in the secured unit. Resident #31 had an order for an alarm guard on 05/07/24 when she was
transferred out of the secured unit. As part of an IDT decision, the order for an alarm guard was requested.
Interview on 05/31/24 at 10:55 AM with MDS Coordinator E, revealed Resident #31's care plan was not
immediately updated to reflect the use of an alarm guard on 05/07/24 until a significant change status MDS
was completed on 05/29/24. MDS Coordinator E said she did not remember she was informed about the
order until she completed the significant change status MDS that involved an assessment of the resident's
care plans. MDS Coordinator E said she developed a care plan to address Resident #31's use of alarm
guard until 05/29/24.
Interview on 05/31/24 at 1:34 PM with LVN F revealed a care plan was used to gather information on focus
areas, goals and interventions. This information was then communicated to the CNAs
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676493
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2