Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Avir at Tierra EsteCMS #7450381 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

745038 02/20/2025 Avir at Tierra Este 14300 Pebble Hills Blvd El Paso, TX 79938
F 0686 Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent infections for 1 of 2 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for quality of care. Residents Affected - Few The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's wound vac setting was set at 115mmhg as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive wound care treatments by placing them at risk for receiving inadequate treatments resulting in the worsening of the wounds. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 12/21/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of sepsis (life-threatening emergency that happens when your body's response to an infection damages vital organs and, often, causes death), pressure ulcer to sacrum, and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 4, indicating his cognition was severely impaired and had pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident #2's physician order dated 2/11/25 revealed wound care to sacrum stage 4 pressure cleanse with Dakin's with normal saline pat dry apply wound vac with granulated foam secure with Tegaderm and set negative pressure continuously at 115mmhg every Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. Record review of Resident #2's care plan dated 2/19/25 revealed a focus area for pressure ulcer stage 4 to sacrum with interventions that included administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. During an observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 11:23 am, Resident #2 was in bed facing the door with wedges under his right torso, he was alert and oriented to person and event. Resident #2 denied any concerns with his wound care and denied any discomfort. Resident #2's wound vac was set at 125mmhg . Resident #2 stated he did get wound care treatment and stated it was almost every day. During an observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 3:35 pm, Resident #2 was in bed facing the window with pillows under his left torso and denied any discomfort to wound. The DON stated Resident's wound vac was set at 125mmhg. The DON stated local supply store delivered the wound vac on 2/11/25 and Page 1 of 2 745038 745038 02/20/2025 Avir at Tierra Este 14300 Pebble Hills Blvd El Paso, TX 79938
F 0686 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm set the rate settings. The DON stated it was expected for the nurses to check the wound vac during wound care to ensure the settings were as ordered. The DON stated she was the nurse who had provided wound care to Resident #2 in the morning (2/19/25) and did not check the wound vac settings. The DON stated the wound vac was supposed to be set at 115mmhg. The DON stated the risk included increased bleeding from suction . Residents Affected - Few During an observation and interview on 2/20/25 at 9:30 am, Resident #2 denied and pain/discomfort to his wound. The ADON assisted him in repositioning to his right side to face the window. The wound vac dressing was slightly lifting on one edge and was dated 2/19/25. ADON noted less necrotic tissue, granulation present, minimal drainage, some slough around the area, and no signs of infection. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 3:16 pm, The Doctor stated that there were no concerns regarding Resident #2's sacral wound at that time. T The Doctor stated there had been no indication of increased drainage or infection. The Doctor stated that the nursing staff was expected to follow the treatment orders as written. The Doctor stated that for not setting the wound vac settings as ordered were increased drainage, discomfort, and pain. During interview on 2/20/25 at 4:46 pm, the Administrator stated she would refer the wound care treatment to the DON. Record review of the facility's policy Wound Treatment Management dated 07/2022 read in part wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physicians orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change . The facility did not have a policy specifically for the wound vac management. 745038 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0686GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F686 - Skin Integrity

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 20, 2025 survey of Avir at Tierra Este?

This was a inspection survey of Avir at Tierra Este on February 20, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Avir at Tierra Este on February 20, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.