Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

St. Juanita Retirement and RehabCMS #7450601 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

745060 01/29/2026 St. Juanita Retirement and Rehab 3215 Ymca Drive San Angelo, TX 76904
F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, before a resident was transferred or discharged , the resident and the resident's representative was notified of the transfer or discharge and the reason for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfer and discharge rights.The facility failed to notify Resident #1's representative of the transfer with the reasons for the move in writing in a language and manner they understand. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving an advocate who could inform them of their options, rights, and the added protection from being inappropriately transferred or discharged . Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/29/26, revealed a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Cerebral infarction (a type of ischemic stroke caused by a blockage in blood vessels supplying the brain, leading to tissue death (necrosis) due to oxygen deprivation), Alzheimer's disease, and hypertensive heart/chronic kidney disease. discharge date revealed 1/24/26, length of stay 1 day, discharge to Facility B with hospice services. Record review of Resident #1's Progress Notes revealed, effective date of discharge 1/24/26, discharge transportation method to Facility B: ambulance picked up Resident #1 from the facility and transported to Facility B. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 10:15 AM, Family Member #2 stated she did not sign any documents or agree to have Resident #1 moved to another facility. She stated the hospice company called her on 1/24/26 and stated Resident #1 was to be moved to another facility. She stated Facility #2 never called her or let her know. She stated she worked with the hospice company regarding the transfer. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 12:55 PM, the Administrator stated Resident #1 was due to come into the facility as dually certified and he would be on the skilled side. He stated once Resident #1 got to the facility an assessment was completed, and they found that Resident #1 did not meet qualifications for receiving hospice and physical therapy services, which changed their services provided to Resident #1. He stated on the evening of 1/23/26, he spoke with the hospice company and Resident #1 could not stay at the facility. He stated he did not have any documentation from a physician order for the transfer. He stated he did not have any family approval documentation for the transfer. He stated he did not have the documentation because he believed HL should have handled everything including the documentation. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 1:25 PM, the HL stated she went to the facility the day Resident #1 was admitted . She stated everything was set up and everything was ready for Resident #1 to stay at the facility receiving end of life services through the hospice company. She stated on 1/24/26 she received multiple calls from the administrator stating that due to Resident #1 not meeting for qualifications for both hospice and physical therapy services the hospice company must get Resident #1 out of his facility. She stated she told the administrator it was not that simple and there was a process to moving Resident #1 to another facility. She stated the administrator did not care and it was Page 1 of 2 745060 745060 01/29/2026 St. Juanita Retirement and Rehab 3215 Ymca Drive San Angelo, TX 76904
F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few their responsibility to get Resident #1 out. She stated the only reason the hospice company set up to get Resident #1 out of the building was because the administrator began to yell and cuss at not only herself but her nurse. She stated the process was not followed, but Resident #1 was moved for the safety of Resident #1 and his family. Record review of the, undated, Facility policy, Your Rights and Protections as a nursing home resident revealed: the nursing home has to safely and orderly transfer or discharge you and give you proper notice of bed-hold and/or readmission requirements. 745060 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0628GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F628 - Documentation

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 29, 2026 survey of St. Juanita Retirement and Rehab?

This was a inspection survey of St. Juanita Retirement and Rehab on January 29, 2026. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at St. Juanita Retirement and Rehab on January 29, 2026?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.