Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ARBOR AT BERKELEYLicense 019201143
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

...continued from LIC9099. Allegations: UNSUBSTANTIATED Staff did not provide resident's medication as prescribed Staff did not monitor resident's blood pressure to ensure it was safe for resident to take medication Staff are not adequately trained to meet resident needs LPA interviewed R1, and R1 stated that he/she was concerned that S1 hadn't been fired. S1 never apologized for doing anything wrong and is still passing medications. On 09/09/24, R1 received a doctor's order to administer his/her own medication, and S2 performed a Medication Self Administration evaluation on 10/02/24 after R1 presented S2 with the physician's note. The license was cited on complaint 15-AS-20240830161136 received 08/30/24 and provided proof of corrections for the above allegations . Allegation: UNSUBSTANTIATED Staff are billing resident for services not being rendered. ED stated that he/she was unaware of a billing issue or dispute related to R1. ED had not received any written or oral communications from R1 regarding billing. ED provided LPA with proof of R1's transaction history for 10/2024 that shows a credit for services, and explained it was effective 10/02/2024 when S2 performed a Medication Self Administration evaluation for R1. ED will provide an explanation and notification to R1 on or before 11/04/2024. Based on information obtained, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that the allegations are not valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. No deficiency cited, exit interview conducted, a copy of this report and appeal rights provided to Douglas Blake, ED.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87705(c)(5)Type A

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia(c) Licensees who...retain residents with dementia shall be...ensuring the following:(5) ...annual medical assessment...reappraisal done at least annually, both of which shall include a reassessment of the resident’s dementia care needs. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on observation, interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by R1 not having reappraisal by the POC which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 24, 2024 inspection of ARBOR AT BERKELEY?

This was a complaint inspection of ARBOR AT BERKELEY on October 24, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ARBOR AT BERKELEY on October 24, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.