Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ARBOR AT BERKELEYLicense 0192011432 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

...continued from LIC9099. Allegation: Substantiated Staff did not ensure residents thermostat was working properly Interviews with staff indicated the following: On 04/22/25, S2 stated. “One of the units on the roof didn't have Freon. It affected about 3 apartments; it was the AC and the heater, and this was to regulate the temperature. On the third floor there were maybe 2 apartments affected.” S4 stated “I will admit that the temperature has been an ongoing issue and that's been about two months. S3 stated that he/she performed periodic checks in R1’s room, and that the centralized system that regulates the temperature did not indicate any fault in R1’s apartment. LPA and S4 attempted to adjust the temperature on R1’s thermostat below 77 degrees F. and thermostat continually defaulted to 77 degrees F. LPA immediately placed a service request with the concierge. On 04/30/25 S1 stated. “The HVAC system has been fixed for well over a week, we have the tech coming out tomorrow for an unrelated project and I will have him stop by the unit once again.” LPA, S3 and S2 attempted to adjust the thermostat to 80 degrees F. LPA returned after an hour and the thermostat increased 1 degree from 78 to 79, but not 80. In addition, R1’s filter needs to be cleaned. Allegation: Substantiated Staff did not do a proper reassessment of residents care needs A Functional Evaluation was conduct for R1 on 10/17/25 by S2, and on 04/08/25 by S3. The 04/08/25 evaluation was initiated by S1 and R1 disagrees. The records reviewed by LPA and R1 revealed that S1, S2 and S3 did not include written record from the facility informing R1’s regular physician of the results of either functional evaluation for R1’s care needs. Based on LPA’s interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED . Deficiency is cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report provided to Tsedey Mekonnen, Concierge.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.80(b)Type B

    1569.80 Care and services decision making; meeting; written record (b) Once prepared, the written record...to determine the care and services provided to the resident written record shall be sent by the facility to that physician. Licensee/ED did not provide written record to R1's physician for the decision making for care and services.

  • 87303(b)(3)Type B

    87303 Maintenance and Operation (b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained at all times. (3) Nothing in this section shall prohibit residents from adjusting individual thermostatic controls. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee/ED did not ensure the facility maintained a comfortable temperature for all residents at all times.

  • 87468.2(a)(2)Type B

    87468.2...Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities(a) ...Residents in All Facilities...shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To have their records and personal information remain confidential...-This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee/ED did not ensure that R1's and RP's records be presented and maintained with confidentiality.

  • 87203Type A

    87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic.-This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee to review the regulation, provide training to staff and submit proof to CCLD by POC. Locks removed from two gates during the visit to allow emergency exiting on both sides.

  • 87224(f)Type B

    87224 Eviction Procedures (f) A written report of any eviction shall be sent to the licensing agency within five (5) days.-This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not provide the notice of eviction in a timely matter to CCLD. The notice provided to R1's RP was unlawful.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 2, 2025 inspection of ARBOR AT BERKELEY?

This was a complaint inspection of ARBOR AT BERKELEY on May 2, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ARBOR AT BERKELEY on May 2, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.80 Care and services decision making; meeting; written record (b) Once prepared, the written record...to determine ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.