complaint·February 16, 2023

...continued from LIC 9099 While conducting interviews on 02/13/23, S1, S2, and W1 stated that S3 was in the Philippines. S1 stated that he/she is the Administrator of Valley View Care Home II and that S2 and W1 were overseeing the residents while S3 was out of the country; S3 is the Co-Administrator at Valley View Care Home III. Although S1 and S3 are both Administrators and Licensees, S1 states that S3 oversees this facility. W1 confirmed working or volunteering 2 -3 hours a day as needed at the facility helping with groceries and prescriptions to help S3 while out of the country. Guardian records revealed that W1 is not associated with the facility. S2 stated that he/she has been providing 24 hours of care since 12/25/22 with the companionship of W1. Although S1 is also the Co-Administrator and Licensee for this facility, S1 said that she is the Administrator and only oversees Valley View Care Home II. Per RP, this facility is vendored by RCEB and sufficient staff was not on the premises since 12/25/2022. S3 did not inform CCL of his/her absence, there is not an LIC 500 or LIC 308 on file. The most current Direct Care Staff Schedule is dated 10/31/2022 to 11/06/2022 with S2 and S3 as the care staff. Based on LPA’s interviews conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D and civil penalty assessments on LIC 421. Failure to correct the deficiencies and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.