Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(continued from LIC 9099) LPA interview with staff at 1:25 PM however, revealed that R1 was administered O2 sometime during R1's isolation due to Covid but it was only for about two (2) hours because R1's O2 level get back to normal and the Hospice Nurse removed it. Regarding the allegation that Residents were forced into receiving hospice services, LPA interview with the Responsible Party (RP) of R1 on 05/21/21 at 10:04 AM, revealed that it was the hospice agency staff who called the RP and suggested for R1 to be put on hospice services and not a facility staff. LPA interview with the Executive Director on 05/21/21 at 3:34 PM, also revealed that no facility staff forced any resident or family member, RP or Power of Attorney (POA) of any resident to sign up for hospice services. She added that the facility nurse could only evaluate the resident and would suggest only that hospice services may benefit the resident and it is up to the resident and their family member/RP/POA to acquire the services of a Hospice agency of their choosing with the guidance of the resident's primary care physician (PCP), as only a physician could determine whether or not a resident requires the services of a hospice agency. Moreover, LPA record review also revealed that R1, Resident #2 (R2) and Resident #3 (R3)'s Hospice agreements were all signed by their corresponding family member/RP/POA. Regarding the allegation that facility gave false information to resident's family member, LPA record review revealed that the facility reported their first case of Covid 19 on 04/23/2020 immediately after they had learned that a resident was tested positive. Further, the facility had been in close coordination with Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) and the Department since the first reported case all throughout the subsequent outbreaks at the facility for guidance and technical assistance. LPA made a reasonable effort and attempted to obtain information from the Reporting Party (RP) as to who gave the false information but did not get any response from the RP. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 26, 2021 inspection of AVANTGARDE SENIOR LIVING OF TARZANA?

This was a complaint inspection of AVANTGARDE SENIOR LIVING OF TARZANA on June 26, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to AVANTGARDE SENIOR LIVING OF TARZANA on June 26, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.