complaint·November 5, 2024

(Continued from 9099) LPA interviewed four (4) staff and all four (4) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed five residents and all five (5) residents were not able to corroborated the allegations. R1 was admitted on 07/20/2024 and moved out on 08/18/2024. According to S3, R1 was prescribed an anti-psychotic for aggression and being combative. S3 stated S3 never personally administered the anti-psychotic due to her schedule. S1 stated that family is always consulted first and make the final decision for any new medication(s). Record reviewed showed that R1 physician ordered the anti-psychotic for agitation with start date of 08/16/2024 and was administered according to doctor's orders. There is no evidence that family was pressured into authorizing anti-psychotic for R1. Allegation: Facility staff do not intervene when resident's engage in physical altercations. It is alleged that resident had an altercation with another residents and staff did not intervene. LPA interviewed four (4) staff and all four staff denied the allegation. S1 stated R1 was found on floor by staff on duty and SIR submitted to the department. LPA interviewed five (5) residents and five (5) of five (5) residents could not corroborate the allegation. All five (5) residents stated they have never witness resident on resident violence at facility. There is not evidence that staff allowed aggressive behavior between residents. Allegation Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal items. It is alleged that facility failed to safeguard resident's phone charger and is lost. LPA interviewed four (4) staff and all four (4) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed five (5) residents and five (5) of five (5) residents could not corroborate any lost or stolen items. S2 stated S2 completes an inventory list when residents move in, Reviewed of R1 personal property showed no phone charger on the list. S2 stated the facility does everything they can to safeguard residents personal property but things do get separated from residents from time to time. There is not enough evidence to substantiate this allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Arrienne Ghammange. A copy of this report along with the appeal rights were provided.