Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THELicense 1976082673 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation #1, that “resident developed a UTI while in care,” has been substantiated based on the records reviewed and interviews conducted. On 9/21/21 LPA reviewed the Valley Presbyterian Hospital intake records for R1 and observed that R1 was admitted for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 4/3/21. At the time of LPA’s visit on 6/1/21, the most recent assessment done of R1 was from 1/11/19, and it indicates that R1 was incontinent and required full assistance with toileting, dressing and grooming. Allegation #2, that “resident wandered from the facility due to lack of supervision” has been substantiated based on the records reviewed and interviews conducted. On 5/11/17 the facility submitted an incident report for R1, indicating that R1 was "on monitoring throughout the day and was caught waiting at the bus stop...wanted to visit friends..does not know where they live.” A review of facility records shows that the most recent assessments conducted prior to this incident were on 1/3/17, when his level of care was assessed to have increased from “lvl 2” to “lvl 3” and he was recommended for memory care, and 12/8/16 when a Mental Status Questionnaire indicated that R1 was experiencing “severe brain dysfunction.” Allegation #3, that “Facility failed to report incidences,” has been substantiated based on the interviews conducted and records reviewed. On 6/1/21 LPA asked the Wellness Director and Resident Care Director if there were any other recent reportable incidents for R1 that came to mind, aside from the 5/21/21 choking incident, and both failed to mention or provide any documentation for the fact that R1 was taken to the hospital on 4/3/21 for a fall and UTI. On 9/21/21 LPA reviewed the 4/3/21 hospital records for R1 as well as the Woodland Hills South Regional Office’s log of incident reports from the facility, and did not observe any record of this incident being reported to Community Care Licensing. Report reviewed, signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited on 9099D page.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(f)(2)Type B

    (2) Safe and healthful living accommodations and services, as specified in Section 87307, Personal Accommodations and ServiceThis requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, the faciity did not ensure that it was kept free from rodents which poses a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility did not report that R1 was hospitalized on 4/3/21 for a Fall and UTI which poses a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87464(f)(4)Type B

    (4) Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing and assistance with taking prescribed medications, as specified in Section 87608, Postural Supports. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that adequate personal assistance and care was provided to prevent the development of a UTI which poses a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include:(1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Codesection 1569.2(cThis requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the records reviewed, the facility did not ensure that R1 was provided with adequate care and suprvision to prevent R1 from leaving the facility without any supervision which poses an immediate risk to the residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 10, 2022 inspection of CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE on February 10, 2022. 3 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE on February 10, 2022?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (1 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "(2) Safe and healthful living accommodations and services, as specified in Section 87307, Personal Accommodations and Se..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.