Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THELicense 1976082672 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Staff #5 (S5) at 1:25pm, LPAs observed all three (3) staff members were not wearing their COVID masks appropriately. LPAs informed staff to put the mask up and use it properly. All three (3) staff members immediately complied and pulled their masks over the nose. Based on LPAs observation, during the visit made on 11/23/21, this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Allegation: Residents rooms are not in good condition During the initial visit, LPAs Panushkina and Stamp conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and observed a broken closet door at 11:25am. In addition, at 11:56am LPAs observed the bathroom vanity in one of the resident rooms was in a bad condition and dirty. At 12:58pm, LPAs observed a cut out in the wall behind the residents’ entrance door. During todays visit LPA Panushkina observed and confirmed that all previously mentioned issues have been resolved/fixed. Based on LPAs observation, during the visit made on 11/23/21, this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Deficiency cited on LIC9099-D Exit interview conducted, appeal rights explained and copy of this report signed and delivered. on 11/17/21, during the morning rounds in a Memory Care Unit, staff discovered R1 sitting on the bathroom floor. LPA was informed that although, R1 had an unwitnessed fall and sustained a minor injury, an immediate care was provided by the facility MedTech. Thus, there was no evidence of neglect/lack of supervision. Based on the information gathered, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not allow resident representative to document an injury It was alleged that on 11/18/21, facility staff refused the Reporting Party (RP) to take pictures of R1 due to the incident that occurred on 11/17/21. To investigate this allegation, during the initial visit (made on 11/23/21) LPAs conducted an interview with the Resident Care Director (RCD) at 10:25am. Interview with RCD confirmed that on 11/18/21 RP visited the facility and was not allowed (by the facility staff) to take pictures of R1 without getting the consent from R1’s primary responsible party. Based on the information gathered, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not provide incident report of unexplained injury It was alleged that on 11/18/21, facility staff would not provide Reporting Party with the incident report for R1. To investigate this allegation, on 11/23/21 LPA Panushkina reviewed all LIC624’s (Unusual Incident/Injury Report) submitted to the Regional Office (RO) from 11/16/2021 to 11/23/2021. Review of documents revealed that a total of nine (9) Incident Reports have been submitted to RO, regarding random residents, and LPA did not observe R1’s incident that occurred on or about 11/16/21 or 11/17/21. However, the facility provided R1’s Incident Report to LPA indicating that the form was filed and submitted to the Regional Office. Based on LPA record review and observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs It was alleged that R1 always smells of urine and his/her clothing is always soaked in urine. To investigate the allegation, during the initial visit conducted on 11/23/21 at 11:30am, LPAs Panushkina and Stamps made observations during a physical plant tour. LPAs did not experience any malodor and all observed residents were clean and well groomed. In addition, during the attempted interview with Resident #1 (R1) at 12:05pm, Continue on LIC9099-C LPAs observed R1’s clothes dried, clean and R1 appeared to be well groomed and looked and smelled fresh/clean. Finally, interviews with staff also revealed that residents are changed regularly and that they are not left soiled for an extended period. Based on observations and interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation, therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Residents toilets not in good condition To investigate this allegation, LPAs Panushkina and Stamp, during the initial visit conducted on 11/23/21, inspected three (3) resident rooms and observed all toilets were in good condition and were properly operating. In addition, during today’s visit (03/18/23), LPA Panushkina inspected an additional three (3) resident rooms between 1:25pm and 1:30pm and observed all bathroom toilets are in good and working condition. Based on LPA record review and observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, record review and observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the closet doors, bathroom vanity and the wall in three (3) rantom residnet rooms were left in disrepair while the rooms were occupied by a residents which poses/posed a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87470(c)(1)(F)Type B

    87470(c) Infection Control Requirements shall be developed by the licensee... (1) The Infection Control Plan shall include: (F) Staff shall demonstrate knowledge... appropriate to the job assigned and...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs observation during a previous visit conducted on 11/23/21, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having three (3) staff members at the facility not wearing COVID masks appropriately, which poses/posed a potential Health and Safety and Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 18, 2023 inspection of CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE on March 18, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE on March 18, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Mainte..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.