Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THELicense 197608267
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

At the time of this visit, LPA reviewed and collected LACDPH covid-19 outbreak notifications and clearance letters to corroborate the Administrator’s statement. Due to this information, the allegation mentioned above is Unsubstantiated. Facility staff sexually abused resident Staff inappropriately kissed resident On 1/26/2022, Investigator Garcia conducted interviews with one resident (R1), two facility staff, and R1’s family member. An interview with R1 revealed that R1 denied being sexually abused by staff or being kissed by staff. R1 did state that they prefer female staff assisting them with hygiene needs, due to them being “very conservative”. An interview with R1’s family member revealed that they do not believe that R1 has been sexually molested or abused, and stated that due to R1’s condition, R1 misinterprets a lot of things. Interviews with two (2) staff members revealed that both denied ever witnessing or hearing about sexually abuse allegations. Due to interviews conducted, the allegations listed above are Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff handle resident roughly Staff speak inappropriately to a resident On 1/26/2022, Investigator Garcia conducted interviews with one resident (R1), two facility staff, and R1’s family member. One staff member (S1) stated that there were times where two staff members would assist and change R1, but that R1 did not like either of those staff members due to their sexual orientation or physical appearance. An interview conducted with R1 revealed that R1 only wants female staff to change them and prefers one specific staff member. Interviews with two facility staff members revealed that there are always two staff present when changing resident’s diapers or hygiene needs. An interview with R1’s family member revealed that R1 tends to “hold onto grudges” and always brought stuff up from other board and care homes, and other staff members alleging similar accusations of being treated roughly or disrespectfully. During today’s visit, LPAs interviewed one staff member (S3) related to this allegation, who provided care for R1. S3 denied treating R1 in a rough manner or speaking inappropriately to R1. On 7/25/23 LPA interviewed out of 13 residents from 12:00 – 1:20 p.m. and 13 out of 13 residents stated that they have not had staff handle them in a rough manner. 13 out of 13 residents stated that no staff have spoken inappropriately to residents in care and are happy with the staff. Due to interviews conducted, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the allegation mentioned above may or may not have happened, therefore it is deemed Unsubstantiated. Facility does not keep residents’ room free from mold. During different visits conducted by LPA Martinez ranging from March – October 2022, LPA Martinez conducted physical plant tour and LPA specifically toured R1’s bedroom. During various visits, LPA Martinez did not observe any wall or window to have mold. LPAs interviewed the Administrator, and Administrator stated that there were never any reports of mold on the walls or windows made by R1 or staff. The only issue in R1’s room was a leak which was already being fixed. On 7/25/23 LPA interviewed 13 out of 13 residents from 12:00 – 1:20 p.m. and 13 out of 13 residents stated that they do not have issues with mold in the room. Additionally, during a physical plant tour today, LPA did not observe any mold in resident rooms. Due to interviews conducted, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Staff do not safeguard resident's property. It is alleged that R1 had personal items such as clothing, and valuables go missing. LPA collected R1’s Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables (LIC 621). R1 did not have any property listed on the LIC 621 and the form had R1’s signature stating they did not want to log any property. An interview was conducted with the Administrator, and the Administrator stated that to their knowledge, no staff have lost, stolen or misplaced any of R1’s items. Administrator stated that staff would assist R1 with storing their beverages, and R1 would often state that their beverages would go missing. However, Administrator does not believe any staff have stolen any of R1’s items. On 7/25/23 LPA interviewed 13 out of 13 residents from 12:00 – 1:20 p.m. and 13 out of 13 residents stated that they have not had any issues with their personal belongings or issues with staff safeguarding their property. Based on interviews and document review this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Resident was not given breakfast On 1/26/2022, Investigator Garcia conducted interviews with one resident (R1), two facility staff, and R1’s family member. In an interview conducted with R1, R1 stated that their only issue is that they do not like the food the facility provides, because it is not to their standards. R1 stated they have their own fridge and R1’s friends bring them food sometimes. R1 did not mention anything regarding not receiving breakfast meals but expressed their dislike of the food service. An interview with one staff member (S1) revealed that there is a food menu and an alternate menu provided to all residents. Additionally, residents have the choice to ask family or friends to bring them their own food. On 7/25/23 LPA interviewed 13 out of 13 residents from 12:00 – 1:20 p.m. and 13 out of 13 residents stated that they are always given the option to have breakfast. Due to interviews conducted, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the allegation mentioned above may or may not have happened, therefore it is deemed Unsubstantiated. Resident does not have access to call button. LPAs interviewed the Administrator and asked if there was ever an instance where R1 did not have access to their call button. Administrator stated R1 always had access to their call button. During different visits conducted by LPA Martinez ranging from March – October 2022, LPA Martinez conducted physical plant tours. LPA specifically toured R1’s bedroom and always observed the pull cord to be over R1’s bed and accessible to R1. On 7/25/23 LPA conducted a physical plant tour at approximately 12:00 p.m. and observed resident rooms to have their call light button directly above their bed. LPA interviewed 13 out of 13 residents from 12:00 – 1:20 p.m. and 13 out of 13 residents stated that they have access to their call light and string. Due to the interview with the Administrator and observation, the allegation mentioned above is Unsubstantiated at this time. Report was signed and delivered. Exit interview conducted. No deficiencies issued.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 25, 2023 inspection of CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE on July 25, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CEDARS ASSISTED LIVING, THE on July 25, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.