Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

VALLEY SILVERTOWNLicense 1976104665 citations on this visit
5 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

At 12:45 p.m. on Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. During the course of investigation of complaint #31-AS-20251203164348 today and complaint #31-AS-20251117123125 on 12/02/25, LPA discovered deficiencies in the facility. At approximately 9:40 a.m. on 12/02/25 during a facility tour, LPA observed the northern exit gate was locked with a padlock. Review of the facility sketch revealed that was an emergency exit leading to a designated assembly point. A deficiency is issued on the corresponding LIC 9099-D page for locking an emergency exit path. At approximately 9:50 a.m., LPA observed the roof entrance above the dining room to be unlocked with no auditory alarm installed. The roof was therefore accessible to residents. No staff were supervising the area, although it was the Assisted Living portion of the facility. LPA conducted a record review at approximately 11:00 a.m. and interviewed the administrator at the same time. Record review and interview revealed at least one (01) resident in the Assisted Living side has dementia, and therefore the roof should not be accessible to residents with dementia. Deficiency is cited on the corresponding LIC 9099-D page. Record review of the medical assessment of Resident #1 (R1) around 11:30 a.m. on 12/02/25 revealed they were bedridden. An incident report submitted on 11/30/25 confirmed R1 was “bedbound”. Review of the facility’s fire clearance revealed the facility can admit eight (08) bedridden residents in Rooms 103-108, 129, 130, 189 or 190. R1 did not reside in a room designated for bedridden residents. A deficiency is cited on the corresponding LIC 9099-D page for violating the facility’s fire clearance. The administrator sent an eviction notice on 11/30/25 for Resident #2 (R2). The notice did not contain certain required elements such as contact information of the Licensing Department, the ability to investigate the eviction, or the statement about the need to file an unlawful detainer. A deficiency is issued on the corresponding LIC 9099-D page for an unlawful eviction. At approximately 2:00 p.m. today, LPA reviewed a notice issued to residents from management. The notice stated “you will be responsible for managing your own medications, including medication storing, administration, and refills” if residents did not provide an updated medical assessment. Interview with licensee Nick today at approximately 2:30 p.m. revealed it was written incorrectly. A resident’s ability to manage and store medications is determined by a medical professional and not based on facility policies. A deficiency is issued on the corresponding LIC 9099-D page for a lack of understanding of Title 22 regulations. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.683(a)Type B

    §1569.683 Eviction notices... (a) In addition... (4) The following statement: "In order to evict a resident ...the... facility... must file an unlawful detainer action in superior court and receive a written judgment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in the eviction notice of Resident #2 (R2) which posed a potential risk to the Health, Safety, or Personal Rights to persons in care.

  • 1569.72(c)Type A

    §1569.72 Bedridden residents - (c) ... bedridden persons may be admitted to, and remain in, residential care facilities for the elderly that secure and maintain an appropriate fire clearance. This requirement was not as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the above section in allowing Resident #1 (R1) to reside in a room not designated for bedridden residents which posed an immediate risk to the Health, Safety, or Personal Rights to persons in care.

  • 87405(d)(2)Type B

    87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (d) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7)... (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in issuing a misleading notice to residents which posed a potential risk to the Health, Safety, or Personal Rights to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(6)Type A

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents... shall have... the following personal rights: (6) To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building, or on facility premises by day or night. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in locking the northern emergency exit to the assembly point which posed an immediate risk to the Health, Safety, or Personal Rights to persons in care.

  • 87705(d)Type A

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia -(d) The licensee shall ensure that the facility has an auditory device... to monitor exits on exterior doors... accessible to those residents who may be at risk for elopement This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in leaving the roof accesible and unlocked which posed an immediate risk to the Health, Safety, or Personal Rights to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 4, 2025 inspection of VALLEY SILVERTOWN?

This was a other inspection of VALLEY SILVERTOWN on December 4, 2025. 5 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious) and 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VALLEY SILVERTOWN on December 4, 2025?

Yes, 5 citations were issued (3 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "§1569.683 Eviction notices... (a) In addition... (4) The following statement: "In order to evict a resident ...the... f..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.