complaint·August 21, 2025

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings . It is being alleged that someone is going into the residents and stealing their belongings. On 08/21/25, between 11:00 AM and 12:30 PM, LPA conducted interviews with S1-S6. Of those interviewed, 6 out of 6 staff denied the allegation. 4 out of 6 staff said that they were not aware of any resident reporting any missing items, and 2 out of 6 staff said they were aware of a resident reporting a stolen item. S1-S2 stated that when a resident reports a missing or stolen item, they will do a sweep and look for the item, they will talk with staff and other residents to see if they know anything about the missing item, and that they will involve the police if they feel the need to. On 08/21/25, between 1:30 PM and 3:00 PM, LPA conducted interviews with R1-R7. Of those interviewed, 7 out of 7 residents denied the allegation. 6 out of 7 residents said they haven’t had an issue with their personal belongings missing or stolen. 7 out of 7 residents said they believe they are responsible for keeping their valuables safe and secure. A review of Unusual Incident/Injury Report dated 07/09/25 revealed that on 07/08/25 a resident informed staff that their debit card was stolen and used at a local 7-11. Staff spoke with that residents Power of Attorney (POA), and they provided the exact timing and amounts of the transactions. Staff went to the 7-11 and confirmed that it was the residents roommate who had used the debit card. Staff called Culver City Police Department, and an investigation was conducted. Staff offered the to relocated the resident (victim) to a private room. Although it did happen, the facility took the proper steps and called law enforcement, reported it to Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD), and other applicable agencies. Based on observation, interviews conducted, and a review of records, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report