Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

STUDIO ROYALELicense 198601566
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition It was reported that staff is not addressing a residents change in medical condition. LPA Shirley spoke with S-1 and was told that R-1’s care services were updated 9/22/24. Resident was being assisted with showers and dressing. LPA Shirley reviewed progress notes for R-1 which are updated periodically and as needed. LPA Shirley observed that on 11/18/24, hospice came for an evaluation for signs of decline. Hospice stated that they didn’t see any signs of further decline. On 12/13/24, R-1 was discharged from hospice services as resident was doing fine. Per S-1, R-1 has a personal companion to assist her 4 hours per day with day-to-day activities of daily living. Per interview with S-1, resident began refusing to eat, showed signs of becoming weaker and requested to stay in bed. On 12/21/24, per progress notes resident was feeling pain in her leg. Per S-1, R-1 had several falls going to and from the bathroom and transferring in and out of the bed. Per S-1, additional services were placed on the care services for R-1. Per interview with S-1 hospice nurse came for evaluation on 1/4/25 and R-1 was placed back on Kaiser hospice. LPA Shirley observed several communications between staff and a family member requesting to meet. On 1/9/25, during interview S-1 had to leave conference room as R-1’s family member requested a meeting regarding the resident’s care. LPA interviewed staff-1 thru staff-8 (S-1 thru S-8). LPA ask, does staff address a residents change in medical condition? Of those interviewed, 8 out of 8 answered yes. LPA interviewed resident -1 thru resident - 5 (R-1 thru R-5). LPA ask, does staff address residents change in medical condition. Of those interviewed, 4 out of 5 answered yes and 1 answered, sometimes. Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient Con'd on 9099-C evidence to support the allegation “Staff did not address a residents change in medical condition,” therefore this allegation is unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies observed during this visit. LPA Shirley conducted an exit interview, and a copy of this report was signed by the Health and Wellness Director, Tamera Gant.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 9, 2025 inspection of STUDIO ROYALE?

This was a complaint inspection of STUDIO ROYALE on January 9, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to STUDIO ROYALE on January 9, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.