Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

STUDIO ROYALELicense 198601566
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Facility staff failed to provide proper supervision to the resident It was alleged that a resident of Studio Royale wandered from the facility unnoticed and was later found by the Culver City Fire Department near dumpsters, dirty, barefoot, cold, and nonverbal, raising concerns about staff supervision. On 08/08/2025, between 12:50pm - 1:04pm, LPA interviewed Administrator (A1). A1 stated it was difficult to determine when staff first became aware that Resident 10 (R10) was missing. A1 reported that R10 made her way down the hall of the south building and exited the door adjacent to the dumpster enclosure. A1 also stated that it appeared R10 exited at approximately 1:20am and there's no record of when she returned to the building. A1 also stated R10 does not have dementia and has no previous history of elopement and wandering. On 09/03/2025 at 10:05am, A1 informed LPA, effective as of 08/06/2025, R10 has one on one private care upon R10 returning to the facility from the hospital after the incident that occurred on 08/02/2025. On 08/08/2025, between 8:28am - 11:42 am, LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1) through Staff 10 (S10). LPA also interviewed Staff 11 (S11) on 08/14/2025 at 3:04pm, Staff 12 (S12) on 08/15/2025 at 6:12pm, and Staff 13 (S13) on 08/27/2025 at 11:12am regarding the allegation. Of the 13 staff interviewed, 3 out of 10 staff confirmed the allegation. 5 out of 10 staff denied the allegation. 5 out of 10 staff were unaware of the situation. Of the 3 staff who confirmed the allegation, S4 stated the facility become aware of R10 being outside of the community upon the paramedics coming to the facility to have staff identify R10 who was unable to identify themselves. Of the 10 staff who denied the allegation and were unaware of the allegation, the staff stated that they were not schedule to work nor present at the time of the incident occurring. On 08/08/2025, between 8:39am - 1:40pm, LPA interviewed Resident 1 (R1) through Resident 10 (R10). 9 out of 10 residents denied the allegation. 1 out of 10 residents were unsure about the allegation. Of the 10 residents, the 9 residents who denied the allegation stated not having any knowledge of the allegation occurring while the 1 resident who was unsure of the allegation could not recall the allegation occurring. Report continues on LIC 9099-C. On 09/02/2025, between 3:10pm - 4:00pm, LPA conducted a records review and observed the following: The Department received the LIC 624 Unusual Incident/Injury Report (dated 08/06/2025) for the incident that occurred on 08/02/2025 at around 6:00am. The report stated R10 was found by the Community Medication Technician lying on the ground near the dumpster across the street from the community. R10 was transported to SoCal Hospital Culver City Emergency Room. The LIC 624 also stated R10 is assessed by the Community Nurse twice a year and as needed for changes in condition, with care plans updated and implemented accordingly. R10’s current plan has been updated as of 08/06/2025 with additional care to meet her needs. The LIC 602A: Medical Assessment for RCFE (for R10 – dated 08/06/2025) on page 5 of 9 under Section 2: Capacity for Self-Care – H. Able to leave facility unsupervised (considering physical or cognitive abilities) is checked “No,” as R10 has a history of multiple falls. However, before the incident that occurred on 08/02/2025, R10’s previous LIC 602A: Medical Assessments (dated 01/08/2024 and 04/25/2023) on page 4 of 6 under Section 14: Mental Condition – Letter K. Able to leave the facility unsupervised was checked “Yes.” Based on interviews and record reviews conducted, there is not enough evidence to support that facility staff failed to provide proper supervision to the resident. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with William "Bill" Boles (Executive Director) and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 3, 2025 inspection of STUDIO ROYALE?

This was a complaint inspection of STUDIO ROYALE on September 3, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to STUDIO ROYALE on September 3, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.