Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

EVERLASTING HOME CARELicense 1986032474 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(5) Medication Administration Records (January 2022). Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros reviewed pertinent documents: Admissions Agreement (dated 08/31/21), Emergency Identification & Information form (dated 08/29/21), Physician’s Report (dated 07/14/21), Wound Care Plan from Memorial Care Palliative Services (dated 01/03/22) with Visit Sign-in Sheet (between 10/07/21 – 01/17/22), Appraisal/Needs & Services Plan (dated 08/29/21), Medication Administration Record (January 2022), staff medication training (various dates), facility staff and residents’ rosters (January 2022). This complaint investigation was referred to the California Department of Social Services Investigations Bureau (IB) and was assigned to Investigator Dennis Seng which included a review of medical records (dated 01/17/22) from Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit; Memorial Care Palliative Care Progress Notes (dated 01/03/22); interviews conducted of hospital staff (Witness #1), hospice staff (Witness #2), Responsible Party for Resident #1 (Witness #3), former facility staff #2 (S2), current facility staff Administrator (A1), Staff #1 (S1), Staff #3 (S3), Resident #2 (R2), Resident #4 (R4). An attempt was made to interview Resident #3 (R3) but was unavailable. Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6) could not be interviewed due to their cognitive impairment. Resident #1 passed away on 01/29/22 due to pneumonia. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding Allegation #1 : Staff neglect resulting in resident developing pressure injuries. This investigation revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on 08/31/21. A review of the resident’s “Physician’s Report” documented under “ Physical Health Status : No history of skin breakdown.” A review of Resident #1’s medical records (dated 01/17/22) from Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit documented Resident #1 was diagnosed with a Stage III (1.5cm x 1.5cm) pressure injury to the right heel on 01/05/22 and (again) on 01/10/22; Stage III (2cm x 2cm) pressure injury to back of right heel on 01/03/22; Stage III (2cm x 3cm) pressure injury to the right foot, back of heel on 12/31/22. Resident #1 had a wound care plan on file from Memorial Care Palliative Services (dated 01/03/22) and was receiving wound care for palliative services (effective 10/07/21) from Memorial Care Palliative Care based on their Progress Notes (dated 10/12/21, 10/21/21, 12/29/21, 12/31/21, 01/03/22, 01/05/22, 01/10/22, 01/17/22). Interview conducted of Witness #1 corroborated that Resident #1 suffered from respiratory failure, septic shock, and deep-pressure injuries; and Resident #1 was not admitted to Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit until 01/17/22 due to multiple Stage III deep-pressure injuries. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Resident #1 passed away on 01/29/22 due to pneumonia. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF SUPERVISION: Staff neglect resulting in resident developing pressure injuries is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency has been observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D). Civil penalties assessed. At this time, an enhanced civil penalty determination is pending in reference to Health & Safety Code 1569.49(e)(1)(A) entitled “Serious Bodily Injury” as defined in Section 243 of the Penal Code that states: “a serious physical condition; including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss of impairment of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement”. An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to the Staff #1 (Maria Miclat). (5) Medication Administration Records (January 2022). Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros reviewed pertinent documents: Admissions Agreement (dated 08/31/21), Emergency Identification & Information form (dated 08/29/21), Physician’s Report (dated 07/14/21), Wound Care Plan from Memorial Care Palliative Services (dated 01/03/22) with Visit Sign-in Sheet (between 10/07/21 – 01/17/22), Appraisal/Needs & Services Plan (dated 08/29/21), Medication Administration Record (January 2022), staff medication training (various dates), facility staff and residents’ rosters (January 2022). This complaint investigation was referred to the California Department of Social Services Investigations Bureau (IB) and was assigned to Investigator Dennis Seng which included a review of medical records (dated 01/17/22) from Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit; Memorial Care Palliative Care Progress Notes (dated 01/03/22); interviews conducted of hospital staff (Witness #1), hospice staff (Witness #2), Responsible Party for Resident #1 (Witness #3), former facility staff #2 (S2), current facility staff Administrator (A1), Staff #1 (S1), Staff #3 (S3), Resident #2 (R2), Resident #4 (R4). An attempt was made an attempt to interview Resident #3 (R3) but was unavailable. Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6) could not be interviewed due to their cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was not interviewed due to hospitalization on 01/17/22 and later passed away on 01/29/22 due to pneumonia. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding Allegation #2 : this investigation revealed following a review of Resident #1’s “ Physician’s Report ” (dated 07/14/21) documented under “Capacity for Self-Care” the resident is “able to feed self”. A review of Resident #1’s “ Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan ” (dated 08/29/21) documented under “Needs – Method of Evaluating Progress: resident will be monitored daily of any decline.” Interviews conducted of staff (S1, S2, S3) corroborated that facility staff were properly caring (encouraging water intake) for Resident #1. Resident #1 had an 8 oz water cup that was provided during mealtimes including juice. An attempt was made to interview Resident #3 (R3) but was unavailable. Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6) could not be interviewed due to their cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was not interviewed due to hospitalization on 01/17/22 and later passed away on 01/29/22 due to pneumonia. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of PERSONAL RIGHTS: Staff not properly caring for resident resulting in resident becoming dehydrated is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding Allegation #3 : this investigation revealed based on interviews conducted of staff (S1, S2, S3) corroborated that facility staff were properly caring (food intake) for Resident #1. Facility staff had to spoon feed the resident and observe the resident consume their food due to the resident’s diagnosis. An attempt was made to interview Resident #3 (R3) but was unavailable. Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6) could not be interviewed due to their cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was not interviewed due to hospitalization on 01/17/22 and later passed away on 01/29/22 due to pneumonia. A review of Resident #1’s “ Physician’s Report ” (dated 07/14/21) documented under “Capacity for Self-Care” the resident is “able to feed self”. A review of Resident #1’s “ Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan ” (dated 08/29/21) documented under “Needs – Method of Evaluating Progress: resident will be monitored daily of any decline.” Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of PERSONAL RIGHTS: Staff did not ensure resident is consuming food is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding Allegation #4 : this investigation revealed based on interviews conducted of staff (S1, S2, S3) corroborated that facility staff did not encourage Resident #1 to stay in bed; as the resident would be sitting in a recliner with their leg on top of a chair with their feet up so as not to place pressure on their wounds. A review of the resident’s Memorial Care Palliative Services Care Plan (dated 01/03/22) with Visit Sign-in Sheet (between 10/07/21 – 01/17/22) documented Witness #2 was observed “awake and sitting in a chair (recliner) or wheelchair”. Resident #1 was not interviewed due to their hospitalization on 01/17/22. An attempt was made to interview Resident #3 (R3) but was unavailable. Resident #5 (R5) and Resident #6 (R6) could not be interviewed due to their cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #1’s “ Physician’s Report ” (dated 07/14/21) documented under “ Physical Health Status : Fair. No history of skin breakdown, ambulatory, and does not require bed care.” Under “ Ambulatory Status : This person can independently transfer to and from bed. This person is considered ambulatory.” (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of PERSONAL RIGHTS: Staff encourages resident to stay in bed is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding Allegation #5 : this investigation revealed based on interviews conducted of staff (S1, S2, S3) corroborated that facility staff administered Resident #1’s medications per physician’s order(s) and not administered with medications to sedate the resident. A review of Resident #1’s “ Physician’s Report ” (dated 07/14/21) documented under “ Medication Management ” that resident cannot administer own medications. A review of the Resident 1’s Medication Administration Record (dated January 2022) documented physician’s medication orders under “Treatment/Medication (type and dosage)” were administered by facility staff who had signed their initials following the administering of resident’s medications. Resident #1’s medications were audited with the MAR and no documentation of medication for sedation was observed to have been administered between the month of December 2022 thru January 16, 2022. Resident #1 was hospitalized on 01/17/22. Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of MEDICATIONS: Staff administering medications to resident without consent is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Staff #1 (Maria Miclat).

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87405(d)(1)Type B

    Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (d) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements for an administrator shall apply. (1) Knowledge of the requirements for providing care and supervision appropriate to the residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Facility retained Resident #1 knowing the resident suffered from multiple deep pressure injuries that were diagnosed a Stage III upon hospitalization at Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit on 01/17/22. This violation which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87466Type A

    Observation of the Resident: The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 was diagnosed with a Stage III (2cm x 3cm) pressure injury to the right foot, back of heel on 12/31/22; Stage III (2cm x 2cm) pressure injury to back of right heel on 01/03/22; Stage III (1.5cm x 1.5cm) pressure injury to the right heel on 01/05/22 and (again) on 01/10/22; and, the resident was not taken to the hospital until 01/17/22. This violation which posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87615(a)(1)Type A

    Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services or have a health condition including but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure sores (dermal ulcers). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: A review of medical records (dated 01/17/22) from Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit documented Resident and was diagnosed with a Stage III (2cm x 3cm) pressure injury to the right foot, back of heel on 12/31/22; Stage III (2cm x 2cm) pressure injury to back of right heel on 01/03/22; and Stage III (1.5cm x 1.5cm) pressure injury to the right heel on 01/05/22 and (again) on 01/10/22; and, facility staff failed to take the resident to the hospital until 01/17/22. This violation which posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87705(c)(4)Type A

    Care of Persons with Dementia (c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: (4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety, and health care needs as identified in their current appraisal. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Resident #1 sustained multiple deep pressure injuries while living at the facility (between 01/03/22 and 01/17/22) until facility staff had the resident transported to Memorial Care Hospital Palliative Care Unit. This violation which posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 16, 2024 inspection of EVERLASTING HOME CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of EVERLASTING HOME CARE on March 16, 2024. 4 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to EVERLASTING HOME CARE on March 16, 2024?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (3 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (d) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 8740..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.