Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PARK REGENCY RETIREMENT CENTERLicense 3060000591 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was alleged that facility staff are not dispensing medications as prescribed. LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on residents, and observed no health and safety issues. LPA interviewed PA and three staff and one staff admitted that Resident #1’s (R1) Fosfomycin, which is to be administered every three days to prevent urinary tract infections, was not given as prescribed, as there are still medications from the April 2025 shipment that remain, and the facility did not order a May 2025 supply. LPA inspected R1’s Fosfomycin and confirmed that five doses from the April 21, 2025, shipment, which should have been given to R1, are still present at the facility. LPA reviewed R1’s Medication Administration Records and noted that this medication is document as having been properly given to R1, which is incorrect. Facility staff were unable to provide an explanation as to why R1’s Fosfomycin was not given as prescribed or why it was documented as having been properly given, but stated the situation is being investigated. LPA inspected the Medication Administration Records for five additional residents and noted that Resident #2 (R2) did not receive any of their medications on May 1, 2025 due to lack of supply. Facility staff were unable to provide documentation of their attempts to follow up with R2’s doctor and pharmacy to ensure R2’s medications were delivered timely. The information obtained corroborated the allegation. During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation mentioned above. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (a) … (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on documents and interviews, the licensee did not ensure R1 received one medication for multiple days and R2 received all of their medications for one day, which poses an immediate health risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 18, 2025 inspection of PARK REGENCY RETIREMENT CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of PARK REGENCY RETIREMENT CENTER on June 18, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to PARK REGENCY RETIREMENT CENTER on June 18, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (a) … (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medicati..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.