Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CAMBRIDGE COURTLicense 3060047611 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099 Submitted records were reviewed and additional interviews conducted. During the March 17, 2023 follow up visit, LPA conducted a follow-up interview with administrator. Regarding the allegation that Facility staff failed to meet resident's needs , the following has been concluded: Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on December 10, 2022. Initially upon admission, the resident's health condition was noted to be good and she would attend meals in the dining room. However, based on interviews conducted the resident's condition was stated to decline rapidly. Shift notes for the month of January however only make one mention of the resident and do not include her transfer to the hospital on January 15, 2023. Upon admission at St. Jude Emergency Department, resident was observed to be severely dehydrated and had sustained Acute Kidney Injury caused by the prolonged diarrhea suffered. Based on interviews conducted, the resident's family had requested to be notified of any continued or worsening condition. Interviews also determined that facility procedure is for caregiving staff to notify Med Tech or Med Tech supervisor for them to get in touch with the family, which does not appear to have been conducted until January 15, 2023. Facility did not take the initiative to get resident assessed by paramedics until requested by family to do so on that day Therefore, based on interviews conducted and a review of records provided the allegation that Facility staff failed to meet resident's needs is deemed to be Substantiated, meaning that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. One deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided and left at facility.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(f)Type A

    87464(f): "Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code [meaning] the facility assumes responsibility for (...) ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health (...) would be endangered. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, facility failed to provide adequate supervision. This posed an immediate risk to the health and safety of individuals in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 16, 2023 inspection of CAMBRIDGE COURT?

This was a complaint inspection of CAMBRIDGE COURT on March 16, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CAMBRIDGE COURT on March 16, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87464(f): "Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.