Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

HILLS OF SHAY DEL, THELicense 3060061181 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff did not provide authorized representative with a refund after resident passed away. It is alleged the staff would refund part of the money, but the Resident #1 (R1) responsible party never received the refund. R1 moved into the facility on October 1, 2025 and passed away on October 5, 2025. The resident’s belongings were removed out of the facility in October. Based on interviews conducted, five out of five staff and one out of one witness corroborated the allegation. One out of one resident could not confirm or deny the allegation. All staff stated that R1 lived in Room 1 and passed away on October 5, 2025. All staff stated R1’s personal belongings were removed on October 6, 2025. All staff stated they heard that the facility did not provide a refund to R1 in a timely manner. S2 stated that the monthly amount for R1 was $7220. S2 stated the admission agreement stated the monthly amount for $7200 and they did not update the admission agreement for the $20 additional charge for DVR. S2 stated that the facility received and deposited a $3500 but did not deposit a check for the amount of $3720 and voided it. One witness also stated that the facility received an amount of $3500 and the facility did not deposit a check for the amount of $3720. Based on record review, the Admission Agreement dated October 1, 2025, stated R1 was admitted to the facility on October 1, 2025. The additional $20 charge for DVR was not updated on the admission agreement. A text message dated October 4, 2025, stated the DVR will be additional $20 per month. On page 5 of the Admission Agreement, stated on page 5 that the admission agreement is terminated on the date of the resident’s death and refund schedule will be prorated The admission agreement stated the responsible party will not be responsible for any charges after the resident’s date of death. A text message dated on October 6, 2025, at 12:39 PM stated that R1’s belongings were picked up and any remaining items will be removed that same day. A text message dated on October 13, 2025, at 2:39 PM, shows a check dated October 2, 2025, for the amount of $3720 marked “Void.” Based on observation, LPA verified that R1 no longer resides at the facility via the Resident Roster dated December 10, 2025. R1 passed away on October 5, 2025, and all of their belongings were removed from Room 1. Continued on LIC9099C Therefore, based on LPA's observations, interviews, and the records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: Staff did not provide authorized representative with a refund after resident passed away is deemed SUBSTANTIATED as per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. A deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. A civil penalty was assessed for a repeated deficiency. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report, LIC9099D, LIC811s, a civil penalty, and the appeal rights were provided to Caregiver Hannah Jose and a copy of the report will be mailed to the corporate address.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.652(c)Type B

    1569.652(c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the individual... within 15 days.This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on record review, interview, and observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. A refund was not issued to R1’s responsible party who paid for the month of October. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 15, 2026 inspection of HILLS OF SHAY DEL, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of HILLS OF SHAY DEL, THE on January 15, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to HILLS OF SHAY DEL, THE on January 15, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.652(c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been remov..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.