Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA conducted an interview with R1’s POA agent who reported they were informed by R1's family that R1 was observed more confused than usual and required medication. R1's POA agent reported R1 has a private caregiver who reported to them that R1's level of confusion was at their baseline. R1's POA agent reported they never instructed facility staff to not administer the medication and were simply waiting on additional information from medical professionals before agreeing to the medication in question due to receiving conflicting information from R1’s family and private caregiver. Assistant Healthcare Director (AHD), Veronica Chavez was interviewed, corroborated the information provided by R1’s POA agent, and reported the facility did not have a signed doctor’s order to administer the medication on 8/6/2024. AHD reported they assessed R1 on 8/6/2024 and 8/7/2024 and R1 was not observed with any symptoms of acute distress. AHD reported the facility received the signed doctor’s order for the medication in question on 8/8/2024 and immediately began administering the medication as prescribed. LPA reviewed R1’s hospice care plan dated 2/2/2024 and conducted an interview with R1’s case manager who corroborated the facility did not receive a signed doctor’s order to administer the medication until 8/8/2024. LPA reviewed hospice’s “Written Confirmation of Telephone Orders” dated 8/7/24 for the medication in question, which noted the physician’s signature was obtained on 8/8/2024. LPA reviewed the Physician’s Order as of 8/16/2024 where the facility documented receiving the medication on 8/8/2024. LPA reviewed R1’s medication administration record for August 2024 and the facility documented administering the medication in question from 8/8/2024 to 8/16/2024. LPA also made contact with the reporting party who reported they do not have any concerns with the care or supervision R1 receives at the facility including medication management. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Staff are not administering medication(s) to resident according to physicians instructions”. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Gomez.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 16, 2024 inspection of HIGHGATE SENIOR LIVING-TEMECULA?

This was a complaint inspection of HIGHGATE SENIOR LIVING-TEMECULA on December 16, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to HIGHGATE SENIOR LIVING-TEMECULA on December 16, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.