Complaint·August 11, 2023

Regarding the allegation, Licensee is not providing activities for the residents, the information obtained from interviews and the record review demonstrated the Licensee is providing activities for the residents. The Information obtained from interviews stated the residents have the right to refused to participate in an activity, and/or to participate in the activities of their choice. Regarding the allegation, the facility is not clean, the information received from interviews, and observations disclose the facility was clean at the time of the investigation. The interviews and the observations do not validate the listed allegation. Regarding the allegation, the facility oven is broken, the evidence obtained from interviews, and observations, does not support the allegation. Regarding the allegation, staff are not following prescription orders, the evidence received from interviews and the record review does not verify the listed allegation. Review of the resident’s medical administration report (MARs) does not validate the allegation. The record review shows the staff are following the prescription orders. Regarding the allegation, Staff not showering residents according to admission agreements, the information gathered from interviews and the record review do not support the listed allegation. The evidence shows the residents are being showered according to the resident's admission agreements, and the resident has the right to refuse any service. The interview with S2 stated that R1 was showered once or twice a week and if R1 refused the shower R1 was given a sponge bath. Regrading the allegation, Staff neglected resident who fell, the information obtained through interviews and the record review proved there was not sufficient evidence to determine if staff neglected a resident who fell. Regarding the allegation, Licensee not reporting incidents to Licensing, the information obtained from interviews and the records reviewed do not support this allegation. CONTINUED ON 9099-C Based on interviews and record reviews the information obtained did not corroborate the listed allegations. There was not sufficient evidence to support the listed allegations, therefore these allegations have been deemed "UNSUBSTANTIATED." An allegation finding of unsubstantiated means "although the allegation may have happened, or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence strand to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, Daryl Lee. This page was produced due to a technical error . No further information has been obtained at this time.