Complaint·October 20, 2021

LPA also observed the Visitor Sign-In and Sign-Out Sheet for the dates of 4/26/21 – 9/30/21 where R1 was receiving visitors. In addition, LPA observed the Resident Off Campus Register from 2/22/21 – 10/1/21. It revealed that R1 left the facility several times with those outings equating to 3 hours or more . LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1-S2) as well as the Executive Director, all of which corroborate that R1 would leave the facility with visitors on outings. Due to the issue of seeking conservatorship/Power of Attorney/and/or Guardianship the Department has no jurisdiction in those areas. However, the Department does have jurisdiction regarding Title 22 regulations. Based on interviews and observation of documentation of signatures, times, and dates, R1 left the facility on outings and/or appointments during an 8-month time span. The preponderance of evidence standards has not been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be UNFOUNDED. “This agency has investigated the complaint alleging, the above-mentioned allegation. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint.” Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no violations were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.