Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 3427008352 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on the facility shower log for the month of April it was learned that four residents were not receiving showers by the facility. It was also learned that some residents did not receive shower a week after the previous shower. LPA Lee also reviewed End of Shift Report and it was learned that on 04/19/2024 resident 1 (R1) was upset because the shower schedule is inconsistent and that (R1) wanted a shower. Based on observations on 07/29/2024 at 9:14 AM, LPA Lee observed (R1) and (R2) call lights turned. It was learned that (R1) was waiting to get assistance with toileting and (R2) was waiting to get assistance with changing (R2) incontinence brief. At 9:26 AM, LPA Lee observed two Resident Aid (RA) walked by both (R1) and (R2)’s room without acknowledging and checking on both resident even though their call lights were turned on. At 9:46 AM, Administrator Assistance, Katelyn Becker approached LPA Lee and LPA Lee informed Katelyn about what LPA Lee have observed and that two residents needed assistance with their ADLs. At 9:54 AM (R1) stopped a (RA) who walked by her to get assistance. It took 37 minutes before a (RA) assisted (R1) with toileting. At 9:54 AM, LPA Lee observed a (RA) going into (R2)’s room to assist (R2) with changing (R2)’s incontinence brief. It took 40 minutes before (R2) received the assistance with changing (R2)’s incontinence brief. Per (R1)'s LIC 602 Physician Report (R1) needs assistance with set for toileting. Per (R2) LIC 602 Physician Report it was learned that (R2) wears brief and needs one person assistance for toileting needs. Moreover, LPA Lee and administrator Caleb toured the facility for an annual inspection on 07/29/2024 and observed resident room 213 and room 110 to have a very strong urine odor. LPA Lee pointed out to administrator regarding the strong urine odor in both rooms and LPA Lee asked administrator what does it mean if a resident's room has a strong urine odor and administrator Caleb stated, "it means the resident are not getting changed or cleaned." As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Nurse Mel and a copy of this LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D page and appeal rights provided to facility.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(i)(1)(B)Type B

    87303(i)(1)(B) Maintenance and Operation(i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria:(1) All facilities licensed for 16 or more and all residential facilities having separate floors or buildings shall have a signal system which shall:(B) Transmit a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location or produce an auditory signal at the living unit loud enough to summon staff. This requirement was not met as evidence by:Based on 6 out 9 interviews with residents’ facility staff are not responding to residents ‘call light in a timely manner. Based on observations on 07/29/2024, two residents waited over 30 minutes to received assistance with their ADLs needs.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type A

    87468.1(a)(2) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and observation, the facility did not attend to two residents ADLs needs in a timely manner. (R1) waited for 37 minutes before a staff assisted (R1) with toileting needs and (R2) waited 40 minutes to get (R2)’s incontinence brief change. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 5, 2024 inspection of CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING on August 5, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING on August 5, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303(i)(1)(B) Maintenance and Operation(i) Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.