Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 342700835
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Furthermore, none of the 9 residents interviewed reported experiencing or hearing of any incidents involving staff stealing residents' money. Resident #1 (R1) stated they do not keep any money at the facility and didn’t have any money. According to R1's Individual Service Plan (ISP), R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and has expressed concerns about people stealing R1’s cigarettes and money and setting R1 on fire. LPA Lee also interviewed all 5 staff members on duty. All denied the allegations and affirmed that they are trained to intervene in conflicts between residents and to assist with resolving disputes. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(d)Type A

    Amend Report to Type A and change the reaseon for the citation.87464 (d) Basic ServicesA facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal specified in Section 87457, Pre-admission Appraisal and providing the other basic services specified below, either directly or through outside resources.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record reviews when R1 missed 3 dialysis treatment the facility did not seek medical treatment in a timely manner for R1, which posed an immedicate risk to R1 in care.

  • 87466Type B

    The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs…This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on interviews and records review, facility staff admitted that R1’s change in condition was not communicated to R1’s responsible party and documented, this poses a potential risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 6, 2025 inspection of CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING on May 6, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING on May 6, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.