Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 342700835
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

According to the kitchen cleaning schedule, daily cleaning is conducted, and staff are required to initial the log upon completion. A review of facility records confirmed an active pest control contract with Official Pest Prevention. The facility receives bi-monthly interior and exterior treatments. Invoices reviewed from 01/04/24 to the present detail the services provided, including target pests and treatment dates. Interviews were conducted with 9 out of 9 residents. All residents reported that the dining area is clean and that they have no concerns regarding kitchen or dining room sanitation. All nine residents also confirmed that kitchen staff consistently wear gloves and hairnets when serving food, both in the dining room and during in-room meal deliveries. Seven of the nine residents reported not seeing any roaches, although a few mentioned seeing spiders in their rooms. However, 7 out of 9 residents expressed dissatisfaction with the food quality and felt that their dietary preferences were not being met. Interviews with 5 facility staff members were conducted, and all denied the allegations. It was alleged that staff were not meeting residents’ dietary needs. This investigation consists of observations, interviews with staff and residents and a review of facility records. LPA Lee visited the facility on 03/18/25, 04/01/25, and 05/02/25. During these visits, LPA observed kitchen staff placing dietary slips on meal trays to ensure that residents with special dietary requirements received appropriate meals when being deliver to residents in their room. Additionally, residents with special diets were observed being served first in the dining room. LPA Lee interviewed 7 out of 9 residents, all of whom expressed no concerns regarding the staff’s not meeting dietary needs and stated that they don’t like the food being served to them. Furthermore, all 5 staff members interviewed denied the allegations. Records review revealed that when Med Techs receive diet orders signed by the residents’ physicians, the Med Techs then will complete a dietary communication form and provide it to the kitchen supervisor, who then updates the dietary information on the kitchen board. This board lists all residents with specific dietary needs to ensure that all kitchen staff are aware of the residents’ dietary needs. Moreover, a copy of the diet type report and signed order is also placed in the Health Services Director’s (HSD) box for updating the Point Click Care (PCC) portal. The HSD is responsible for updating the PCC portal with any changes to dietary orders. As an additional measure, kitchen staff follow up with the HSD monthly to confirm the accuracy of dietary order lists and ensure compliance with residents’ dietary requirements. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(d)Type A

    Amend Report to Type A and change the reaseon for the citation.87464 (d) Basic ServicesA facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal specified in Section 87457, Pre-admission Appraisal and providing the other basic services specified below, either directly or through outside resources.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record reviews when R1 missed 3 dialysis treatment the facility did not seek medical treatment in a timely manner for R1, which posed an immedicate risk to R1 in care.

  • 87466Type B

    The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs…This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on interviews and records review, facility staff admitted that R1’s change in condition was not communicated to R1’s responsible party and documented, this poses a potential risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 6, 2025 inspection of CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING on May 6, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CITY CREEK ASSISTED LIVING on May 6, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.