Complaint·January 28, 2026

On 1/26/2026, LPA received a statement from the facility administrator (S1) reporting an incident in which (R1) eloped from the facility on 1/24/2026. LPA was unable to interview facility staff (S2) as staff (S3) stated that (S2) is no longer employed at the facility. During a tour of the facility, LPA observed the auditory alarms were present on the front door and on the resident bedroom (Room 4) sliding door leading to the backyard. However, despite these additional safety measures, R1 was able to leave the facility without staff supervision or awareness. The allegation was observed not in compliance with Title 22 regulation 87464(f)(1) Basic Services. As the facility did not ensure that a resident in care was kept under continuous supervision which resulted in elopement. As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED . A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Aisake and a copy of the LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D pages, and Civil penalties were issued in the amount of $500 per the LIC 421IM and appeal rights were provided to facility.