Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection

FOREMOST RETIREMENT RESORT INCLicense 36553021010 citations on this visit
10 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with maintenance staff, Juan Castro and introduce self and stated the purpose of the visit. Juan phone called Administrator, Jennifer Uriza and informed her about the visit. Administrator stated that she would arrive shortly after. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) licensed capacity for 96, (76 nonambulatory and 20 bedridden) and hospice waiver approved for 48. The facility has 4 wings that consist of 12 resident bedrooms, 12 bathrooms, common rooms with tvs and a private patio in each wing, along with a reception area, laundry room, offices, dining room, and kitchen. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 72, 76, 77, 77, 73. 73, 75, 75 and 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Water temperature measured at 120, 112, 105, 105, 105, 106, 112, 107, 110 and 105 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed that the facility had a broken tile on a resident's sink wall, broken window screen, broken patio gate door, and a smoke and sprinkler annual inspection clearance report missing. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the facility did not have slip-resistant mats in all of the residents showers. Deficiency issued. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed that the facility did not have toilet paper and hand soap in many of the residents bathrooms. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the facility did not have the quantity sufficient of linens to permit changing at least once per week for all residents. Deficiency issued. The facility is equipped with operating fire extinguishers and carbon monoxide alarms. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for residents/staff files. Medications were kept in Med-Room inaccessible to residents. LPA observed that the signal systems were not working in each wing. Deficiency issued. Food Service: LPA observed 2 days of perishables and 7 days non-perishables food, pantry stocked and up to date. Facility has a variety of food available. Dishes, cups, and utensils were stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. LPA observed upon arrival that there was no administrator present during normal working hours. Deficiency issued. Record Review: LPA reviewed resident files for admission agreements, physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed that the personnel files were incomplete and missing CPR training, TB testing, and personnel record. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that the facility did not have the personal rights and complaint information accessible to all residents and visitors. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that residents in the facility were not aware of the menu options, activities schedule and phone usage since the notices were not posted in the common area of each wing. Deficiency issued. LPA observed during medication audit that the resident's MARS were not completed with the required information per the medication label; MARS did not have the staff's initials after administering medication; and PRN medication inventory did not match the MARS and physician's orders. Deficiency issued. LPA reviewed the infection control plan, liability insurance, disaster drills and emergency disaster plan. LPA observed that the facility did not have emergency drills conducted quarterly for each shift. Technical violation issued. LPA observed that the Emergency Disaster Plan did not have a date of revision. Technical violation issued. Deficiencies and technical violations were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D, LIC9102TV and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Administrator, Jennifer Uriza.

Citations

10 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.618(a)Type B

    Based on observation and interview, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not being present during normal working hours which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    Based on observation, record review, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not addressing the broken tile on a resident's wall next to the sink, broken window screen, broken patio gate door, and not having the smoke and sprinkler annual inspection clearance report which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(e)(5)Type B

    Based on observation, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having slip resistant mats in the residents showers which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(i)(2)Type B

    Based on observation and interview, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having working signal systems in each wing which poses potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87307(a)(3)(C)Type B

    Based on observation and interview, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having the quantity sufficient of linens to permit changing at least once per week for all residents which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87307(a)(3)(D)Type B

    Based on observation, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having toilet paper and hand soap in many of the residents bathrooms which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(a)Type B

    Based on observation and record review, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having personnel files complete with CPR training, TB testing, and personnel record which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not having the resident's MARS completed with the required information per the medication label; MARS hainge the staff's initials after administering medication; and PRN medication inventory matching the MARS and physician's order which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not making sure that residents were aware of the menu options, activities schedule and phone usage with notices posted in the common area of each wing which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468(c)Type B

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not posting the personal rights and complaint information accessible to all residents and visitors which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 29, 2026 inspection of FOREMOST RETIREMENT RESORT INC?

This was a inspection inspection of FOREMOST RETIREMENT RESORT INC on January 29, 2026. 10 citations were issued: 10 Type B.

Were any citations issued to FOREMOST RETIREMENT RESORT INC on January 29, 2026?

Yes, 10 citations were issued (0 Type A, 10 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on observation and interview, the administrator did not comply with the section cited above by not being present d..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a inspection inspection. inspection inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.