complaint·December 3, 2024

and all indicated that facility staff provides adequate supervision to residents and monitor all visitation throughout the facility. Second allegation: Staff do not prevent resident from sexually harassing other resident(s) in care. Regarding the above allegation LPA conducted interviews with residents pertaining to the allegation stated above five out of six residents denied being sexually harassed by Resident #1. In addition, six residents denied witnessing Resident #2 being sexually harassed by Resident #1. LPA conducted interviews with staff which four staff denied allowing such behavior to take place at the facility. Four staff also denied witnessing resident sexually abusing other residents. Third allegation: Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided a safe and healthy living environment while in care. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interview with residents where five out of five residents informed LPA of feeling safe at the facility. In addition, five out of five residents informed LPA that the environment at the facility is okay, and they have no health concerns. Fourth allegation: Staff did not provide the necessary assistance to resident to ensure that resident received Assisted Living Waiver Services. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interview with Facility Administrator during the interview Facility Administrator informed LPA that Facility became aware that Resident #2 was not enrolled to Assisted Living Waiver. Administrator informed LPA that facility residents responsible party of the situation. Furthermore, Administrator provided documentation to LPA that revealed that facility was cooperating with resident and provided resident with a 60-day notice of new rate that resident will be paying while resident gets enrolled to Assisted Living Waiver. Due to corroborating evidence the department has determined that the alleged allegation is Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara at the end of the visit.