Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CARLSBAD VILLAGE SENIOR LIVINGLicense 3746040652 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

R1 tried to scream, and the man placed his hands on R1’s mouth and told them not to scream or he would hurt R1. The man moved R1’s wheelchair and stood beside R1’s bed pleasuring himself and asked R1 to perform a sexual act. Interview with staff revealed that on February 4, 2020, at about 6:10am a caregiver was alerted that R1 pushed their pendant button and needed assistance. As the caregiver attempted to open R1’s door the unknown man was pushing against it to prevent her from entering. When she entered the room, she asked the man what he was doing there and struck him several times in the head. The suspect then ran out of the building. R1 advised the caregiver that the suspect tried to rape them, and the caregiver noticed R1’s pajamas and underwear were on the floor at the end of their bed. Interview with the Executive Director (ED) revealed the incident occurred in the middle of shift change. ED stated that the facility doors open at 6am and close at 7pm. ED also stated that there was no one at the front desk at 6am since the front desk worker starts at 7am. ED agreed that anyone could walk in the facility and no one would see them. After review of interviews from R1, staff and outside agency, it is evident that the lack of supervision and safety protocols resulted in the attempted rape of R1 and therefore the above allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22. On February 6, 2020, the facility reported to Community Care Licensing an unwitnessed fall which resulted in serious bodily injury of Resident 1 (R1). Subsequently it was alleged that R1 suffered a fall that resulted in subdural hematoma on February 4, 2020. Interview with staff revealed at around 1pm, R1 called out verbally for assistance after falling. Three caregivers went to R1's room and found them on the bathroom floor. R1 advised staff that they fell while brushing their teeth. Staff stated R1 can pull themselves up out of the wheelchair and R1 prefers to do things on their own. Interview with R1 revealed they were in their wheelchair and wheeled themselves to the bathroom, to brush their teeth. When asked why they didn't call anyone for help, R1 stated they wanted to do it on their own. R1 stated the brakes were not engaged on the wheelchair and their hand slipped causing them to fall backwards and hit their head. (Continued on LIC9099-C) A review of facility records revealed R1 had a stroke on February 19, 2011, which resulted in a weak left leg. It was also documented that their primary diagnosis was gait instability. R1 had over six unwitnessed falls from August 13, 2019 through February 4, 2020. On February 4, 2020, R1 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of subdural hematoma. Outside agency notes dated February 8, 2020, show that R1 advised hospital staff they had also fallen two other times in the previous week; and both times they fell in the bathroom and hit their head in the same place. Despite the facility documenting all R1’s previous falls and reassessments, no measures were put in place to mitigate future falls or increase supervision. A review of the plan of care dated February 2, 2020, revealed a history of falls but there were no documented objectives to mitigate falls other than reminding resident to call for assistance when transferring. Based upon interviews conducted and records review, the above allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Due to the serious nature of the allegations, the Department will review this case for a Civil Penalty per Health and Safety Code section 1569.49(f). An exit interview was conducted with Wesley Lavender and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to Wesley Lavender whose signature below confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87463(a)Type A

    The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition. Significant changes shall include but not be limited to: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not update the appraisal to note significant changes and did not keep the appraisal accurate in 1 of 100 persons in care (R1) which posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type A

    Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not accord safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations for 1 out of 100 persons in care (R1) which posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 28, 2022 inspection of CARLSBAD VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of CARLSBAD VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING on June 28, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CARLSBAD VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING on June 28, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to k..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.