complaint·February 18, 2026

(Continued from LIC9099) Outside source 1 (OS1) revealed that the facility did not follow proper procedures when giving R1 the eviction notice. OS1 reported that the facility did not provide documentation explaining the reason for eviction, or the resident’s right to appeal. OS1 expressed concern that the lack of written notice made it difficult to arrange alternative placement and understand the process. They confirmed that no discharge plan or assistance was offered by the facility and stated that they expected proper notice in compliance with regulations. During the investigation, the LPA reviewed facility records, including eviction notices, communication logs, and resident files. The review revealed that R1 was asked to leave the facility without receiving the required 30-day written notice. Notices lacked clear reasons for eviction and did not include information about appeal rights, as required by Title 22. Additionally, there was no evidence of discharge planning or coordination to ensure safe relocation for affected residents. Based on relevant interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence has been met that alleged violation occurred and are therefore substantiated.  Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D).  A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Adrian Guillen , to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.