Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MONTE VISTA VILLAGE SENIOR LIVINGLicense 3746044413 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continued from LIC9099) Regarding the allegation that Licensee did not ensure R1 had clean bedding. More specifically, a stained blanket was observed by the Reporting Party on 09/09/2024. Department interviews with Staff #1 and Staff #2 revealed acknowledgment that the facility’s linen inventory included worn or stained items. Department resident interviews revealed that multiple residents reported bedding and towels that were stained, worn, or frayed. Department LPA observations revealed worn linens in circulation during the visit. Photo evidence presented by reporting party showed visibly stained bedding. Regarding the allegation that Licensee’s staff did not treat resident with dignity. More specifically, a caregiver allegedly removed a spoon from a resident and stated, “You’re done now,” abruptly ending the resident’s meal. Department resident interviews revealed a credible eyewitness account confirming that the incident occurred and describing additional instances of abrupt or cold interactions by the same caregiver. Regarding the allegation that licensee did not keep the facility free of insects. More specifically, residents and photographs showed food left out after meal service, and multiple residents reported mosquitos, ants, and spiders inside Building 17 as well as main dinning area. Photo evidence supported that food remained out long after meals in November 2024. Department interviews with Staff #4 revealed awareness of mosquitos and use of a UV insect device in at least one room. Department resident interviews revealed repeated observations of mosquitos, ants, spiders and flies over time. Department LPA observations confirmed exterior doors to Building 17 were propped open and food remnants were left out, contributing to pest presence. LPA observation on 4/10/2026 Blue light pest control traps on the walls of the main dining area. Observation also revealed large sliding glass doors that lead into the common/dinning building and may contribute to insects entering the building. Based on relevant interviews, LPA observations, records review, and photo evidence, the preponderance of evidence has been met that the above violations occurred and are therefore SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (see attached LIC 9099D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Adrian Guillen, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided. (Continued from LIC9099) Regarding the allegation that licensee did not meet R1’s incontinence care needs, Department interviews with staff revealed no double padding practices, and residents did not report issues with their own care. Department records review revealed documentation did not indicate inadequate incontinence care. Photo evidence showed saturated items but lacked context linking the condition to facility practice. Regarding the allegation that dressing/bathing needs were unmet, Department interviews with staff and residents revealed consistent showering practices, and records review revealed shower logs indicating missed care. Interviews with Residents did not indicate concerns with dressing or bathing. Regarding the allegations related to dietary preferences, activities, medication administration, centrally stored medications, pharmacy selection, staff health, and staff communication ability, Department interviews with staff revealed no confirmed violations; Department resident interviews revealed no consistent concerns; Department records review revealed no documentation supporting the allegations; Department LPA observations revealed no concerns. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations, and records review, the preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred; therefore these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Adrian Guillen, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times.... for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. .This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not ensure the facility was clean, safe, and sanitary for multiple residents in Building 17, as LPA observed stained and torn linens, insects inside the building, food left out, and exterior doors propped open, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87464(f)(2)Type B

    Basic Services. Basic services shall at a minimum include: Safe and healthful living accommodations and services, as specified in Section 87307, Personal Accommodations and Services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interviews the licensee did not provide safe and healthful living accommodations for 9 out of 9 residents (R1-R9), which poses a health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type B

    87468.1(a)(1) Residents shall be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. Based on interviews, the licensee did not ensure dignity was accorded to 1 out of 1 resident in care (R1) when staff ended the resident’s meal by removing the spoon while the resident was still eating, which poses a personal rights risk.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 10, 2026 inspection of MONTE VISTA VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MONTE VISTA VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING on April 10, 2026. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MONTE VISTA VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING on April 10, 2026?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (0 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times.... for the safety and well-being o..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.