Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

GARDEN CREEKLicense 4058004671 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 4/15/2022 at 12:00 pm, LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1) who stated that they were aware of an incident where Staff #2 (S2) had given a PRN to Resident #1 (R1), and R1 did not request it. On 4/19/22 at 2:05 pm, LPA reviewed a document title “Employee Warning Notice” dated 9/09/2020. In the Notice, there were two infractions on medication errors. S2 was noted to “have signed for a medication that was never given” and “Med Error for Carbidopa Levodopa from bubble pack.” Both infractions were in August 2020, and S1 was demoted from Med-Tech to Personal Care Assistant. Based on evidence obtained, the allegation “Facility staff did not give medication as prescribed,” is deemed Substantiated at this time. S1 was found to have performed medication errors which could have caused injury to residents in care. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited, and report and appeal rights emailed to the administrator and VP of Operations. On 4/15/2022 from 11:48 am to 2:35 pm, LPA interviewed five staff. All five staff stated that when a resident has dementia-like behaviors, staff inform their supervisor, and the resident is tested for a UTI. If the resident does not have a UTI, the resident is assessed by their physician. If physician diagnoses a resident with dementia, management meets with the resident’s family and discusses steps for moving the resident to a facility with a higher level of care. Based on evidence obtained, the allegation “Facility retains residents who require more care and supervision than is provided by the facility” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Documentation shows the facility is not retaining residents with dementia and staff interviews corroborate the process for ensuring residents with onset dementia are assessed and given the care needed. Exit interview conducted and report emailed to the administrator and VP of Operations.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(6)Type B

    1569.269(a)(6) Enumerated rights; severability. (a)Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (6) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as residents were not administered their medications as prescribed which poses a potential health and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 19, 2022 inspection of GARDEN CREEK?

This was a complaint inspection of GARDEN CREEK on April 19, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to GARDEN CREEK on April 19, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.269(a)(6) Enumerated rights; severability. (a)Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.