Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

MAYFLOWER CARE HOMELicense 435200608
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On December 20, 2024, LPA Tarin interviewed witness (W1) stated that the ADM is using R1’s hospitalization to refuse R1 to return to the facility. W1 stated that R1 was hospitalized on December 15, 2024, R1 is at their baseline, ADM must take R1 back to the facility, and there is no change in level of care. On December 20, 2024, LPA Tarin interviewed Kaiser Social Service Manager (SSM) stated that R1 has anticipated discharge of December 20, 2024. SSM spoke with the Doctor and R1 will be staying overnight. Also, SSM stated that he/she spoke to ADM who stated he/she feels that R1 requires a higher level of care and R1 exceeds the level of care the facility can provide. On December 21, 2024, LPM Manzano communicated with ADM. ADM stated that Kaiser nurses were initially not able to provide a medical assessment for R1 at the hospital. ADM stated she wanted more medical information regarding R1’s condition. ADM stated on December 21, 2024, she was informed about R1’s conditions. ADM stated R1 will be discharged to the care home and requested an updated Physician’s Assessment by R1's Primary Care Physician. On December 26, 2024, LPA Rai conducted an initial complaint investigation. The Department received, obtained, and reviewed the following documents for resident 1 (R1): Physician’s Report and Appraisal Needs & Services Plan (ANS). LPA Rai interviewed ADM. ADM stated R1 went to the hospital on December 15, 2024, after R1 expressed numbness on the right side of his/her body. ADM stated she assessed R1 on December 17 and 19, 2024, at the hospital. ADM stated that she was waiting to receive an update from the nurses before accepting the resident back to the facility. ADM stated on December 20, 2024, the hospital called to inform R1’s discharge and ADM stated that she wanted to conduct her assessment, but Patient Care Coordinator did not tell ADM R1’s updated diagnosis. ADM stated that she did not refuse R1 and wanted additional assessment regarding his/her conditions. On December 21, 2024, ADM conducted her assessment and nurses informed ADM about R1’s condition. ADM stated that R1 returned to the facility on December 21, 2024. Page 2 of 3. Therefore, based on interviews conducted, on-site observations, and facility records review, the above allegations are false, could not have happened, and/or are without a reasonable basis, therefore the allegations are UNFOUNDED . During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited from CCR, Title 22, Division 6. An exit interview was conducted with ADM, Isabel Eslava and a copy of this report was provided to her. End of Report. Page 3 of 3.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 7, 2025 inspection of MAYFLOWER CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of MAYFLOWER CARE HOME on March 7, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MAYFLOWER CARE HOME on March 7, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.