Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CARLTON PLAZA OF SAN JOSELicense 435200727
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Suspicious death: On 9/8/2022, LPA interviewed family member of R1 (FM). FM stated R1 was on hospice care since April 2020, and did not have any concern about R1's death. On 9/13/2022, LPA interviewed ED, staff S1 and S2, S1 and S2 stated R1 was on hospice care, and R1 did not respond to stimuli, and R1 had poor food and liquid intake, and was very weak. On 9/21/2022, LPA interviewed FM. FM stated R1 was severely disabled, bedridden, unable to reposition in bed, and required 24 hours care to assist with ADLs since 2020. FM stated R1 had dementia. FM stated during the past 2 years, R1's doctor was not certain how long R1 would live. The Department obtained R1's medical records to review, which included LIC624a (Death Report), medical appointment visit notes dates 12/16/2020, and physician letter dated 1/19/2021 and 6/20/2022. Based on the R1's physician's certification for hospice benefit dated on 12/14/2020, R1 has life expectancy of around six months if the terminal illness runs its normal course. Based on R1's certificate of death dated on 07/01/2022, R1's death is due to heart and neurocognitive disorder. On 7/5/2022, the Department received a LIC624a (Death Report) from the facility reporting that R1 died on 7/1/2022 at the facility while under Hospice care. On 1/19/2021, R1's VA medical doctor certified that R1 is no longer capable of making decisions and DPOA will need to be appointed. On 6/20/2022, R1 was seen by geriatric doctor to certify R1 to be placed in facility closer to DPOA/son. The physician discussed R1 being placed under Hospice care. There was no evidence of neglect or lack of supervision of R1. Based on the documents reviewed and interviews conducted, R1's cause of death is not suspicious rather R1's death is due to heart and neurocognitive disorder per death report. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on the investigation, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview was conducted with Executive Director (ED). A copy of this report was provided to ED.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 8, 2022 inspection of CARLTON PLAZA OF SAN JOSE?

This was a complaint inspection of CARLTON PLAZA OF SAN JOSE on November 8, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CARLTON PLAZA OF SAN JOSE on November 8, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.