Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THELicense 435202775
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 of 4. Facility staff gave resident expired medication. It was alleged the medication carts which stored the resident’s medication had expired medication. On 1/31/2023, the LPA observed the medications in the medication cart and did not observe expired medications. On 12/16/2024, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff (S1-S3) who were working at the facility during the time of the complaint was received on 1/26/2023. Three of three staff stated they have not seen or heard of residents being administered expired medication. S3 stated the Medication Technicians administer the medications and S3 has seen the Medication Technicians follow the facility’s police on administering medications to the residents. On 12/16/2024, LPA Rai interviewed at random 3 residents residing in Memory Care unit when this complaint was initially received by the Department. Two out of three residents refused to be interviewed. One out of three residents were not able to answer LPA’s questions related to this complaint investigation. Facility staff are not properly dispensing medication to residents. It was alleged Medication Technicians (Med-Tech) would leave the resident’s medication on the tables, assessable to residents. On 1/31/2023, the Department interviewed S3 who was designated to administer medication to residents. S3 stated Assisted Living residents came to Medication Room to administer medications and MedTech would deliver to Memory Care residents. On 1/31/2023, the LPA observed the resident rooms and dining rooms. LPA did not observe medications left on the table. On 12/16/2024, LPA Rai interviewed at random 3 residents residing in Memory Care unit when this complaint was initially received by the Department. Two out of three residents refused to be interviewed. One out of three residents were not able to answer LPA’s questions related to this complaint investigation. Page 3 of 4. On 12/16/2024, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff (S1-S3) who were working at the facility during the time of the complaint was received on 1/26/2023. Three of three staff stated they have not seen or heard of staff not properly dispensing medication to residents. All three staff stated they have not seen resident’s medication on table or counters accessible to residents. S3 stated the Medication Technicians administer the medications to the resident directly and they observe the resident taking the medication. S3 stated the Medication Technicians note residents that refuse medication as well. S3 has seen the Medication Technicians follow the facility’s police on administering medications to the residents. Facility staff are not properly managing resident’s medications. It was alleged the Medication Administered Record (MAR) was incorrect, the medication was logged as administered, but the medication was refused or left in the medication cart. On 1/31/2023, the Department interviewed 3 staff members (S1-S3). Two staff did not answer questions related to this allegation. S3 stated everything was documents correctly in the MAR. S3 stated staff would try three times if resident refused to take medications. S3 stated when resident refused to take medication, it was reported to the Director and resident’s physician. On 1/31/2023, the LPA observed the medications in the medication cart and did not note any issues wherein the MAR was incorrect. Facility staff are not ensuring that residents are adequately fed. It was alleged resident R1 and R2 did not receive the assistance feeding lunch due to be short staffed, so the residents were not fed lunch. On 1/31/2023, the Department interviewed 3 staff members. One out of three staff stated all residents received and were fed meals. S1 stated there are dedication caregivers to help residents for the meals and there is no shortage of facility staff at the time. Page 4 of 4. On 1/31/2023, the Department interviewed 3 residents (R1-R3). R1 stated he/she always had meals in the dining room. LPA observed a designated caregiver with R1. R2 was not able to speak with LPA due to language barrier. R3 stated all the residents eat meals in the dining room and receive their full meals. On 1/31/2023, the LPA observed the resident rooms and dining rooms. LPA did not observe meals left on the table unconsumed. Based on the interviews conducted with clients and staff and based on observation and records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Executive Director, Corey Miller and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 16, 2024 inspection of WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THE on December 16, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to WATERMARK AT ALMADEN, THE on December 16, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.